神经保护集束化管理与胎龄<29周新生儿脑室内出血率
该多中心回顾性队列研究纳入加拿大17个NICU中胎龄<29周的6522例新生儿,比较IVH神经保护集束化管理实施前后的结局。实施后部分临床实践改善,但严重IVH或早期死亡复合结局、严重IVH及出血后脑室扩张的发生率均无变化。
要点
- IVH-NB实施后延迟脐带结扎、预防性吲哚美辛和正常体温比例增加,出生时心肺复苏和气管插管减少。
- 实施后严重IVH或生后7天内死亡复合结局的aOR为1.07(95%CI 0.84–1.35),无显著改善。
- 仅早期动脉导管未闭治疗(2个站点采用)与结局改善相关(aOR 0.30,95%CI 0.17–0.55)。
核心结论
- 在大型多中心队列中,IVH神经保护集束化管理的实施与临床实践改善相关,但未改善严重IVH或早期死亡等结局。
研究设计与样本
- 多中心回顾性前后对照队列研究,纳入加拿大新生儿网络17个实施IVH-NB的NICU中胎龄<29周新生儿,共6522例(实施前3216例,实施后3306例)。
主要发现
- 实施后延迟脐带结扎(56% vs 62%,P<.0001)、预防性吲哚美辛(15% vs 19%,P<.0001)和正常体温(50% vs 56%,P<.0001)增加。
- 实施后出生时心肺复苏(29% vs 25%,P<.0001)和气管插管(46% vs 41%,P<.0001)减少。
- 实施后复合结局aOR 1.07(95%CI 0.84–1.35)、严重IVH aOR 1.02(95%CI 0.80–1.31)、出血后脑室扩张aOR 1.18(95%CI 0.78–1.79)均无变化。
- 仅早期动脉导管未闭治疗(2个站点采用)与结局改善相关(aOR 0.30,95%CI 0.17–0.55)。
- 未发现结局的时间趋势。
临床怎么用
- 实施IVH-NB可促进延迟脐带结扎、预防性吲哚美辛和正常体温等实践,但本研究中未转化为严重IVH或死亡结局的改善。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of intraventricular hemorrhage-neuroprotection bundle (IVH-NB) implementation on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rates in infants born at <29 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, retrospective, preimplantation and postimplementation cohort study included neonates of <29 weeks' gestation admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network. Sites which implemented IVH-NB were identified via a survey. Data were collected for 36 months each for preimplantation and postimplementation periods per NICU, with 1-month washout. Infants with major anomalies or admitted >2 days after birth were excluded. Primary outcome was a composite of severe IVH (grade III/IV) or death ≤ first 7 days. Secondary outcomes included severe IVH, posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation, and severe neurological injury (severe IVH or periventricular leukomalacia). RESULTS: Seventeen NICUs that implemented IVH-NB were included, contributing a total of 6522 infants (3216 preimplementation and 3306 postimplementation). Postimplementation, deferred cord clamping (56% vs 62%, P < .0001), prophylactic indomethacin (15% vs 19%, P < .0001), and normothermia (50% vs 56%, P < .0001) increased, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (29% vs 25%, P < .0001) and endotracheal intubation at birth decreased (46% vs 41%, P < .0001). After implementation, aOR for the composite outcome (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84, 1.35), severe IVH (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.80, 1.31), and posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (aOR 1.18 95% CI 0.78, 1.79) were unchanged. The only bundle component associated with improved outcomes was early patent ductus arteriosus treatment adopted by 2 sites (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17, 0.55). No temporal trend in outcomes was identified. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort, IVH-NB implementation was associated with improved practices but not with improved outcomes.
引用
- Deshpande P, Goswami I, Mohammad K, et al. Neuroprotection Bundles and Intraventricular Hemorrhage Rates in Neonates <29 Weeks' Gestation. J Pediatr. 2026. PMID: 42208756. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2026.115162
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。