超声辅助与传统体表标志法腰椎穿刺在新生儿及婴儿中的随机对照试验
该单中心前瞻性随机对照试验纳入≤6月龄需腰穿的NICU婴儿,比较静态超声辅助与传统体表标志法腰穿。超声辅助可能提高经验较少操作者2次内成功率,效果受腰穿和超声经验影响。
要点
- 超声辅助未提高首次尝试无创伤性腰穿成功率,两组均为50%。
- 超声辅助可能提高经验较少操作者2次内成功率,效果受操作经验影响。
核心结论
- 在NICU婴儿中,超声辅助未改善首次尝试无创伤性腰穿成功率。
- 超声辅助可能提高经验较少操作者2次内成功率,效果受腰穿和超声经验影响。
研究设计与样本
- 单中心前瞻性随机对照试验,2016年8月至2020年1月在一家三级NICU进行。
- 纳入≤6月龄需腰穿的婴儿,1:1随机分为超声辅助组或传统体表标志组。
- 因COVID-19疫情提前终止招募,最终分析91名婴儿的95次腰穿,由16名操作者完成。
主要发现
- 首次尝试无创伤性成功在两组均为50%(OR 1.00;95%CI 0.41-2.43;P=1.00)。
- 其他操作成功结局两组无差异。
- 超声辅助提高了经验较少操作者2次内成功率,随腰穿经验增加获益减弱;操作者超声经验也修饰效果。
临床怎么用
- 在NICU婴儿腰穿中,不应常规期望超声辅助提高首次尝试无创伤性成功率。
- 对于经验较少的操作者,可考虑使用超声辅助以提高2次内成功率。
- 使用超声辅助时需注意操作时间可能延长。
局限性
- 因COVID-19疫情提前终止招募。
- 单中心研究,样本量有限(91名婴儿,95次腰穿)。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether static ultrasound improves first-attempt, nontraumatic lumbar puncture (LP) success compared with the traditional landmark technique in infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial at a single tertiary-care NICU between August 2016 and January 2020. Infants ≤6 months of age requiring LP were randomized 1:1 to ultrasound-assisted or traditional landmark LP. The primary outcome was first-attempt, nontraumatic LP success. Secondary outcomes included success within 2 attempts, procedure duration, and antibiotic exposure. Recruitment was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: We analyzed 95 LPs performed in 91 infants by 16 proceduralists. First-attempt nontraumatic success occurred in 50% of LPs in both groups (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.41-2.43; P = 1.00). Other procedural success outcomes did not differ between groups. Procedure time was longer in the ultrasound group (mean 25.9 vs 17.9 minutes; P = .002). Median antibiotic duration was similar (8 days in both groups; P = .74). Ultrasound assistance improved success within 2 attempts among less experienced proceduralists, with diminishing benefit as LP experience increased. Operator ultrasound experience also modified effectiveness, with improved success observed among proceduralists with prior ultrasound exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound assistance did not improve first-attempt nontraumatic LP success compared with the traditional landmark technique in NICU infants. Ultrasound assistance may improve success within 2 attempts among less experienced proceduralists, with effectiveness influenced by both LP and ultrasound experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02918149https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT02918149.
引用
- Ekhaguere OA, Kesman R, Reiter J, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Assisted versus Traditional Landmark Lumbar Puncture in the Neonatal and Infant Population. J Pediatr. 2026. PMID: 42103066. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2026.115139
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。