康奈尔儿童谵妄评估（CAPD）
用途适用： serial bedside observation in critically ill children.
分层Positive screen → search reversible causes; not a stand-alone DSM diagnosis.
局限不适用： without considering developmental baseline. · 易错点： scoring deeply sedated patients without context. · Pair with CAPD developmental anchor chart when available.
出处Traube C, et al. Crit Care Med 2014 (CAPD)
本班次下一步
评完分数后：进场景连算、看相邻评分、打开对应路径。本地参考，不写入 HIS。
方法学 · 公式代入、指南要点与完整说明
适用场景
适用： serial bedside observation in critically ill children.
需要填写的项目
- Makes eye contact with caregiver · 选项
- Actions purposeful · 选项
- Aware of surroundings · 选项
- Communicates needs and wants · 选项
- Restless · 选项
- Inconsolable · 选项
- Underactive — little movement while awake · 选项
- Takes long time to respond to interactions · 选项
计算方法与公式
Eight items scored 0–4 (developmental-positive items reverse-weighted). Total 0–32; ≥9 usually positive if typically developing.
Observe over the nursing shift; adapt cutoffs for developmental delay per local validation.
公式代入演示
下列数值取自本工具各输入项的示例值，用本页公式在服务端实际算出，供快速核对计算过程。仅演示代入方法，不构成临床建议，也不代表任何真实病例。
| Makes eye contact with caregiver | Sometimes (2) |
|---|---|
| Actions purposeful | Sometimes (2) |
| Aware of surroundings | Sometimes (2) |
| Communicates needs and wants | Sometimes (2) |
| Restless | Sometimes (2) |
| Inconsolable | Sometimes (2) |
| Underactive — little movement while awake | Sometimes (2) |
| Takes long time to respond to interactions | Sometimes (2) |
→CAPD16/32
- Screen：≥9 — positive delirium screen (typical development)
- Developmental delay：Some cohorts use higher cutoffs (e.g. ≥17) — follow local validation
结果判读与分层
Positive screen → search reversible causes; not a stand-alone DSM diagnosis.
指南要点（原创整理）
- Cutoff often ≥9.
- Reassess causes (hypoxia, drugs, infection).
- 下一步： pCAM-ICU / analgesia-sedation review.
以上为依据相应指南的关键推荐、由本站用自己的语言归纳整理（非指南原文）；完整内容请见下方官方来源。
注意事项与局限
- 不适用： without considering developmental baseline.
- 易错点： scoring deeply sedated patients without context.
- Pair with CAPD developmental anchor chart when available.
核对与出处 · 可验证治理
参考指南与出处
- Traube C, et al. Crit Care Med 2014 (CAPD) · 来源 ↗
指南全文版权归相应学会/期刊所有；本工具仅实现其决策算法并注明出处，全文请经上方官方来源获取。
依据文献年份见参考 · 数据集整理日 2026-10-08
常见问题
常见问题
- 康奈尔儿童谵妄评估（CAPD）的计算是否上传患者数据？在哪里计算？
- 计算在浏览器本地完成，输入与结果不上传服务器；结果仅供执业医师参考，须结合病史、检查与本机构方案判断，不构成诊断或处方依据。
- 康奈尔儿童谵妄评估（CAPD）怎么代入计算？能举个例子吗？
- 代入: Makes eye contact with caregiver Sometimes (2)、Actions purposeful Sometimes (2)、Aware of surroundings Sometimes (2)、Communicates needs and wants Sometimes (2)、Restless Sometimes (2)、Inconsolable Sometimes (2)、Underactive — little movement while awake Sometimes (2)、Takes long time to respond to interactions Sometimes (2) → 结果: CAPD 16 /32（Screen: ≥9 — positive delirium screen (typical development)、Developmental delay: Some cohorts use higher cutoffs (e.g. ≥17) — follow local validation）
核对流程与方法学
核对与依据
本工具的公式与计算方法已在本页明示、公开可逐一核查。其公式、系数与阈值依据上方「参考指南与出处」列出的权威来源核对。想了解本站对全部临床工具的核对流程与出处覆盖情况，见 临床工具核对表与方法学 →