文献速递介入DSA

意大利介入心脏病学诊断参考水平全国调查更新

National survey to update the Italian diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology.
PubMed 文献 · Eur J Radiol · 2026-06-01

意大利国家卫生研究院联合科学学会在14个大区40家中心开展多中心回顾性调查,纳入6363例成人介入心脏病操作,更新六类操作的诊断参考水平(DRL)。DRL取各中心中位值的第75百分位数,并针对CA+PCI、PM/ICD及RFA建立了按复杂度分层的参考水平。

要点

  • CA的诊断参考水平更新为PKA 38 Gy·cm²,CA+PCI为89 Gy·cm²。
  • TAVI的PKA诊断参考水平为184 Gy·cm²,显著高于其他介入操作。
  • CA+PCI、PM/ICD及RFA按操作复杂度设有分层DRL,报告时可参照对应层级。

核心结论

  • 更新了意大利六类介入心脏病操作的诊断参考水平,CA+PCI、PM/ICD和RFA另建立了复杂度分层DRL。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性观察性多中心研究,来自意大利14个大区40家代表性中心,共分析6363例介入操作。
  • 调查覆盖成人CA、CA+PCI、TAVI、PM/ICD、RFA和EPS六类介入心脏病操作。
  • 收集PKA、累积空气比释动能、透视时间等辐射剂量指标以及患者年龄、体重、BMI和操作复杂度等参数。
  • 采用既定方法论,DRL取各中心中位值的第75百分位数,并与国际基准进行比较。
  • 对PKA进行了多变量分析以识别影响辐射暴露的临床和操作因素。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • CA的PKA诊断参考水平为38 Gy·cm²。
  • CA+PCI的PKA诊断参考水平为89 Gy·cm²。
  • TAVI的PKA诊断参考水平为184 Gy·cm²。
  • PM/ICD的PKA诊断参考水平为11 Gy·cm²,RFA为18 Gy·cm²,EPS为12 Gy·cm²。
  • CA+PCI、PM/ICD和RFA建立了按复杂度分层的DRL。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 介入心脏病操作辐射剂量报告应参照更新后的PKA诊断参考水平评估是否符合本地水平。
  • CA+PCI、PM/ICD和RFA需结合操作复杂度选择对应分层的DRL进行剂量比较。

局限性

  • 回顾性观察性研究设计本身存在信息偏倚与混杂控制局限。
  • 数据仅来源于意大利境内中心,推广至其他国家或地区需谨慎。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

INTRODUCTION: The Italian National Institute of Health, in collaboration with national scientific societies, coordinated a multicenter survey to update Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for interventional cardiology across Italy. Regular revision of DRLs is essential to reflect technological advances and procedural optimization. Using an established methodology, anonymized patient, procedural, and equipment data were collected from 40 representative centers across 14 Italian regions.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a restrospective observational study. The survey focused on six major interventional cardiology procedures in adult patients: coronary angiography (CA), CA with percutaneous coronary intervention (CA + PCI), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), pacemaker implantation and cardiac implantable device (PM/ICD), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and electrophysiological studies (EPS). For each procedure, radiation dose metrics-including Kerma Area Product (PKA), cumulative Air Kerma, and fluoroscopy time-were collected. Patient-related factors (age range, weight, BMI, etc.), clinical and technical parameters were also recorded and procedures were classified according to type and complexity.

RESULTS: A total of 6363 procedures were analyzed. National DRLs were derived as the 75th percentile of the median values from individual centers and compared with international benchmarks. A multivariable analysis of PKA was performed to identify clinical and procedural factors significantly influencing patient radiation exposure and to establish complexity-stratified DRLs.

CONCLUSION: Updated DRL values were defined for all six procedures: 38 Gy·cm2 for CA, 89 Gy·cm2 for CA + PCI, 184 Gy·cm2 for TAVI, 11 Gy·cm2 for PM, 18 Gy·cm2 for RFA, and 12 Gy·cm2 for EPS. Complexity-specific DRLs were also established for CA + PCI, PM, and RFA, providing guidance for optimizing patient radiation exposure in interventional cardiology practice.

来源:Eur J Radiol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. D'Ercole, Palma, Cavallari, et al. National survey to update the Italian diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur J Radiol. 2026. PMID: 42287901. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112976

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。