文献速递神经MR

多尺度脑指纹影像组学与图论网络指标整合用于阿尔茨海默病的特征刻画与分类

Multiscale characterization and classification of Alzheimer's disease via integration of brain fingerprint radiomics and graph‑theoretical network metrics.
PubMed 文献 · Neuroradiology · 2026-06-04

本研究基于结构MRI提取多个AD相关脑区的影像组学特征构建个体脑指纹,并利用脑区间相关矩阵建立图结构、计算节点度、聚类系数和介数中心性等网络指标,采用SVM和集成分类器对AD、MCI和正常对照进行分类。AD vs NC训练集AUC达0.995(95%CI: 0.983-1.000),测试集AUC为0.935;海马、内嗅皮层和后扣带回显示显著结构异常,高阶认知网络出现整合效率下降和代偿性中心性升高。

要点

  • 海马、内嗅皮层和后扣带回的结构异常是AD相关影像组学特征的关键脑区。
  • 图论指标提示高阶认知网络整合效率下降伴代偿性中心性升高。
  • AD vs NC分类测试集AUC为0.935,AD vs MCI和MCI vs NC测试集AUC分别为0.895和0.920。

核心结论

  • 脑指纹影像组学与图论网络指标整合框架可实现AD相关结构重组的多层次量化,并提供可解释且可靠的分类性能。

研究设计与样本

  • 本研究从结构MRI多个AD相关脑区提取高维影像组学特征构建个体脑指纹,并基于脑区间相关矩阵建立图结构。
  • 研究采用支持向量机和集成分类器进行AD、MCI与正常对照的组间分类,并识别关键影像生物标志物。

关键影像表现/征象

  • 特征映射显示海马、内嗅皮层和后扣带回存在显著结构异常。
  • 图论指标显示高阶认知网络整合效率下降,并伴有代偿性中心性升高。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • AD vs NC分类训练集准确率0.9563、敏感度0.950、特异度0.9625、AUC 0.995(95%CI: 0.983-1.000),测试集准确率0.825、AUC 0.935。
  • AD vs MCI训练集AUC为0.972,测试集AUC为0.895。
  • MCI vs NC训练集AUC为0.952,测试集AUC为0.920。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 阅片时可关注海马、内嗅皮层和后扣带回的结构改变,并结合影像组学特征辅助AD与MCI的鉴别。
  • 图论网络指标(节点度、聚类系数、介数中心性)可提示高阶认知网络的拓扑改变,作为结构影像的补充信息。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) associated with global population aging has become a critical health concern. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for timely clinical intervention. Structural MRI-based radiomics and graph-theoretical modeling have recently provided new perspectives for identifying neurodegenerative changes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a unified framework integrating morphological brain fingerprinting and graph-theoretical network analysis to classify AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal controls (NC), and to characterize the structural alterations across these distinct disease stages.

METHODS: High‑dimensional radiomic features were extracted from multiple AD‑related regions in structural MRI to construct individualized brain fingerprints. A graph structure was established using the inter‑regional correlation matrix, from which network metrics were derived to quantify topological connectivity, including node degree, clustering coefficient, and betweenness centrality. Support vector machine (SVM) and ensemble‑based classifiers were then employed to perform group classification and identify key imaging biomarkers.

RESULTS: In the AD vs NC classification, the model achieved the highest training accuracy (ACC = 0.9563), sensitivity (0.950), specificity (0.9625), and AUC = 0.995 (95% CI: 0.983-1.000); testing performance remained robust (ACC = 0.825, AUC = 0.935). For AD vs MCI and MCI vs NC, the training AUC were 0.972 and 0.952, while the testing AUC were 0.895 and 0.920, respectively. Feature mapping revealed a pattern of structural alteration, with the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and posterior cingulate showing significant abnormalities. Graph metrics indicated decreased integration efficiency and compensatory centrality increases within high-order cognitive networks.

CONCLUSION: The proposed fingerprint-graph integration framework enables multilevel quantification of AD‑related structural reorganization, offering interpretable and reliable classification performance. It provides a promising foundation for early diagnosis, individualized assessment, and precision‑oriented neurodegenerative research.

来源:Neuroradiology,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Xu S, et al. Multiscale characterization and classification of Alzheimer's disease via integration of brain fingerprint radiomics and graph‑theoretical network metrics. Neuroradiology. 2026. PMID: 42236609. doi:10.1007/s00234-026-04049-x

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。