文献速递乳腺MRPET

定量乳腺影像的未来:从整合性生物标志物到整体性生物标志物用于精准癌症诊疗

The Future of Quantitative Breast Imaging: Integrated to Integral Imaging Biomarkers for Precision Cancer Care, From the AJR Special Series on Quantitative Imaging.
PubMed 文献 · AJR Am J Roentgenol · 2026-05-06

本综述探讨定量影像生物标志物(QIBs)通过预后分层和疗效评估指导乳腺癌个体化治疗的潜力。来自前瞻性临床试验的数据表明,QIBs对治疗结局的预测能力优于传统基于大小的指标。尽管QIBs在试验环境中显示效用,临床采用仍有限。文章介绍了来自DCE-MRI、DWI、[18F]FDG PET和[18F]FES PET的生物标志物,并强调实施挑战包括采集方案可变、缺乏标准化以及治疗期间最佳成像时机的不确定性。作者区分了整合性生物标志物(用于试验内相关性或探索性目的)和整体性生物标志物(对试验设计至关重要并直接指导患者分层或治疗决策)。国家和国际组织的标准化工作正在进行以确保影像标志物的可靠性,支持临床转化的商业工具已可用。仍需要专用的端到端解决方案将QIBs整合到临床工作流程和标准诊疗路径中。

要点

  • QIBs对治疗结局的预测优于传统肿瘤直径变化。
  • DCE-MRI、DWI、FDG PET和FES PET可提供预后和疗效生物标志物。
  • 临床采用受限于采集协议可变和缺乏标准化。

关键影像表现/征象

  • DCE-MRI衍生生物标志物可用于预后分层和疗效评估。
  • DWI衍生生物标志物可用于预后分层和疗效评估。
  • [18F]FDG PET衍生生物标志物可用于预后分层和疗效评估。
  • [18F]FES PET衍生生物标志物可用于预后分层和疗效评估。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • QIBs在预测治疗结局方面优于传统基于大小的指标(如肿瘤直径变化)。
  • 整合性生物标志物用于试验内相关性或探索性目的。
  • 整体性生物标志物对试验设计至关重要并直接指导患者分层或治疗决策。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 关注DCE-MRI、DWI、FDG PET和FES PET衍生的定量指标。
  • 注意采集协议可变和缺乏标准化对QIBs可靠性的影响。
  • 考虑治疗期间最佳成像时机的不确定性。

局限性

  • QIBs临床采用有限。
  • 采集协议可变。
  • 缺乏标准化。
  • 治疗期间最佳成像时机不确定。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

This review explores the potential of quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) for guiding personalized breast cancer treatment through prognostic stratification and measurement of treatment response. Accumulating data from prospective clinical trials show that QIBs are more predictive of treatment outcome than conventional sizebased measures (e.g., change in tumor diameter), highlighting these markers' potential clinical impact. Although QIBs have shown utility in the trial setting, clinical adoption has remained limited. In this article, we present biomarkers derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, DWI, [18F]FDG PET, and [18F]FES PET, and highlight implementation challenges including variable acquisition protocols, lack of standardization, and uncertainty around optimal timing of imaging during treatment. We distinguish between integrated biomarkers-those used for correlative or exploratory purposes within a trial-and integral biomarkers-those that are essential to trial design and directly inform patient stratification or therapeutic decisions. Standardization efforts by national and international organizations are underway to ensure imaging marker reliability, and commercial tools supporting clinical translation have become available. Dedicated end-to-end solutions remain needed to integrate QIBs into clinical workflows and ultimately into standard care pathways, to promote these markers' role in patient stratification and adaptive treatment decisions.

来源:AJR Am J Roentgenol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. McDonald ES, Kazerouni AS, Metanet P, et al. The Future of Quantitative Breast Imaging: Integrated to Integral Imaging Biomarkers for Precision Cancer Care, From the AJR Special Series on Quantitative Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2026. PMID: 42089524. doi:10.2214/AJR.25.32958

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。