文献速递乳腺技术与安全US

深度学习模型无创预测乳腺癌Ki-67表达及预后分层:多中心回顾性研究

Deep learning model for noninvasive prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognostic stratification in breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
PubMed 文献 · Eur Radiol · 2026-05-07

本研究基于四个中心的超声与临床信息构建深度学习模型,采用ResNet-50提取超声特征并经逻辑回归整合临床信息,用于无创预测乳腺癌Ki-67状态。外部测试集AUC为0.828(95%CI 0.761-0.890),高Ki-67组淋巴结转移率更高(67.7% vs 16.2%,p<0.001)且无复发生存更差(p=0.041),模型对术后前6个月复发预测AUC为0.820。

要点

  • 超声联合临床信息的深度学习模型可无创预测乳腺癌Ki-67状态,外部测试AUC=0.828。
  • 高Ki-67组淋巴结转移率显著高于低Ki-67组(67.7% vs 16.2%)。
  • 模型对术后前6个月复发预测AUC达0.820,有助术后随访策略制定。

核心结论

  • 基于超声和临床信息的无创模型可预测Ki-67状态、分层淋巴结转移风险并提供预后信息。

研究设计与样本

  • 超声特征经ResNet-50提取,与临床信息通过逻辑回归整合;采用类激活映射和列线图可视化预测过程。
  • 以AUC、混淆矩阵、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评估模型对Ki-67的预测性能,并以淋巴结转移和无复发生存评估预后相关性。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • 外部测试集中联合模型预测Ki-67的AUC为0.828(95%CI 0.761-0.890)。
  • 联合模型预测淋巴结转移的准确率为0.765。
  • 联合模型预测术后前6个月复发的AUC为0.820。
  • 高Ki-67组淋巴结转移率为67.7%,低Ki-67组为16.2%(p<0.001)。
  • 高Ki-67组无复发生存较低Ki-67组更差(p=0.041)。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 可在术前利用超声图像和临床信息无创评估Ki-67状态,辅助手术规划和个体化治疗决策。
  • 模型预测的高Ki-67状态提示淋巴结转移风险较高,阅片时可关注腋窝淋巴结评估。
  • 模型对术后早期复发有预测价值,可辅助制定个性化随访策略。

局限性

  • 本研究为回顾性设计,可能存在选择偏倚。
  • 外部测试集仅来自一个独立中心,泛化性需更多中心验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

OBJECTIVE: Ki-67 correlates with prognosis for patients with breast cancer. However, the evaluation of Ki-67expression relies on pathological analysis and invasive biopsy, which hinders its wide adoption. This work sought to develop a noninvasive Ki-67 prediction model for breast cancer patients through ultrasound and clinical information and evaluate model performance in risk stratification of lymph metastasis and prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, ultrasound, pathological, and prognostic information were collected from four centers to develop a deep learning (DL) model. Ultrasound features were extracted by ResNet-50 and integrated with clinical information through logistic regression. Class activation mapping and nomograms were used to visualize the prediction process. Area under curve (AUC), confusion matrices, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate model performance on Ki-67. Prognostic relevance was evaluated with lymph node metastasis and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS: From January 2021 to December 2024, 456 patients from three centers were collected as training (n = 264), validation (n = 96), and internal test (n = 96) sets, 204 patients from an independent center were collected as an external test set. In the external set, the combined model achieved satisfactory performance on Ki-67 (AUC = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.761-0.890). High Ki-67 group showed higher lymph metastasis rates (67.7% vs 16.2%, p < 0.001) and worse RFS (p = 0.041) than the low Ki-67 group. The combined model achieved the best predictive ability on recurrence in the first 6 months after operation (AUC = 0.820).

CONCLUSION: This noninvasive model could predict Ki-67 status, classify the risk of lymph metastasis, and provide prognostic insights. Its wide application would contribute to the formulation of individualized treatment plans and follow-up strategies.

KEY POINTS: Question Ki-67 is an important pathological information in breast cancer and is meaningful for lymph metastasis and prognosis. However, it can currently only be evaluated through invasive testing. Findings We developed a non-invasive model based on ultrasound and clinical information, which can predict Ki-67 status (accuracy = 0.828), classify lymph metastasis (accuracy = 0.765), and provide prognostic insights (p = 0.041). Clinical relevance This model enabled preoperative prediction of Ki-67 status and lymph metastasis for patients with breast cancer, thereby informing surgical planning. Furthermore, it demonstrated prognostic utility, facilitating the development of personalized patient follow-up strategies.

来源:Eur Radiol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Yu W, Chen P, Chai S, et al. Deep learning model for noninvasive prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognostic stratification in breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2026. PMID: 42095876. doi:10.1007/s00330-025-12203-x

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。