机器学习融合临床与超声信息优化CKD肾纤维化评估
该前瞻性研究纳入2019年4月至2022年6月在本机构接受肾脏超声和活检的CKD患者,比较特征级和决策级融合策略鉴别轻度与中重度肾纤维化的效能。结果显示多模态融合优于单模态模型,测试队列中决策级融合模型AUC达0.92(95%CI: 0.84-0.99),敏感度0.80、特异度0.90、准确率0.84。
要点
- 决策级融合模型鉴别轻度与中重度肾纤维化效能最佳,AUC 0.92。
- 特征级融合、临床模型和超声模型的AUC分别为0.86、0.82和0.80。
- 融合策略有助于CKD风险分层和个体化管理。
核心结论
- 信息融合策略可提升鉴别CKD患者轻度与中重度肾纤维化的诊断效能,其中决策级融合方法最有效。
研究设计与样本
- 前瞻性研究,纳入2019年4月至2022年6月在本机构接受肾脏超声和活检的CKD患者。
- 收集临床实验室指标和超声参数,构建特征级融合(整合临床与超声特征)和决策级融合(整合各模态模型输出决策)两种机器学习策略。
- 以活检为参考标准,采用ROC曲线、AUC、敏感度、特异度和准确率评估诊断性能。
诊断标准与关键数值
- 测试队列中决策级融合模型AUC 0.92(95%CI: 0.84-0.99),敏感度0.80,特异度0.90,准确率0.84。
- 特征级融合模型AUC 0.86(95%CI: 0.76-0.95)。
- 临床模型AUC 0.82(95%CI: 0.71-0.92)。
- 超声模型AUC 0.80(95%CI: 0.68-0.93)。
临床应用与阅片要点
- 日常阅片中可关注超声参数与临床实验室指标的联合应用,辅助鉴别轻度与中重度肾纤维化。
- 决策级融合模型表现出较高特异度(0.90),有助于减少中重度纤维化的误判。
局限性
- 单中心前瞻性研究,样本量未在原文中报告。
- 原文未报告外部验证队列的结果。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开
PURPOSE: Machine learning has been extensively applied in nephrology. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various information fusion strategies for differentiating mild from moderate-to-severe renal fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled CKD patients who underwent renal ultrasound and biopsy at our institution from April 2019 to June 2022. Clinical laboratory indicators and ultrasound parameters were collected and analyzed. Two fusion strategies using machine learning techniques were developed: one at the feature level, which combines clinical and ultrasound features, and the other at the decision level, which integrates decisions from individual modality model outputs. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), along with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics.
RESULTS: The multimodality fusion strategy demonstrated enhanced diagnostic performance compared to the single modality models. In the test cohort, the decision-level fusion model yielded optimal diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.99), sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.90, and accuracy of 0.84. This was followed by the feature-level fusion model (AUC: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.95), the clinical model (AUC: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.92), and the ultrasound model (AUC: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.93).
CONCLUSION: Information fusion strategies enhance diagnostic performance in differentiating mild from moderate-to-severe renal fibrosis in CKD patients. The decision-level fusion approach, which integrates outputs from individual models, proved most effective. These advancements support personalized CKD management by facilitating risk stratification and targeted treatment approaches.
引用
- Chen Z, Wang Y, Liang Y, et al. Optimizing Renal Fibrosis Assessment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Feature and Decision-Level Fusion in Machine Learning Using Clinical and Ultrasound Information. J Ultrasound Med. 2026. PMID: 42184128. doi:10.1002/jum.70305
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。