文献速递腹部介入技术与安全CTMR

肝细胞癌系统治疗综述及临床实践中疗效评估方法

Review of systemic therapy in HCC with an approach to response assessment in clinical practice.
PubMed 文献 · Abdom Radiol (NY) · 2026-05-28

本文综述了肝细胞癌系统治疗的快速演变,免疫检查点抑制剂联合方案已重塑一线治疗。影像学评估需整合RECIST 1.1与mRECIST,关注整体疾病负荷、混合缓解及非典型反应。推荐采用「森林与树木」的分区评估策略,结合LI-RADS治疗反应算法,支持多学科决策。

要点

  • 系统治疗疗效评估需关注整体疾病负荷,报告应描述混合缓解、癌栓及肝外病变。
  • mRECIST评估存活强化肿瘤,可能更好反映治疗效应,但高缓解率未一致转化为总生存获益。
  • 系统与局部治疗重叠时,推荐按分区整合RECIST/mRECIST与LI-RADS治疗反应算法。

核心结论

  • 系统治疗时代HCC疗效评估需整合影像、生物标志物与临床参数,放射科医生应报告整体疾病负荷及混合缓解。
  • RECIST 1.1仍是临床试验主要标准,mRECIST可能更好反映特定情境下的治疗效应,但高缓解率未一致转化为总生存改善。
  • 系统与局部治疗重叠时,推荐采用分区方法整合RECIST或mRECIST与LI-RADS治疗反应算法以支持多学科决策。

研究设计与样本

  • 综述性文章,总结HCC系统治疗进展及临床实践中疗效评估方法,未报告系统检索范围与纳入文献数量。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • RECIST 1.1基于肿瘤大小标准,可能无法充分反映HCC治疗诱导的坏死或血供减少而无明显缩小的生物学缓解。
  • mRECIST评估存活强化肿瘤,在某些情境下可能更好反映治疗效应,但更高缓解率未一致转化为总生存改善。
  • 系统与局部治疗时间重叠时,推荐分区整合RECIST或mRECIST原则与LI-RADS治疗反应算法评估近期治疗病灶。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 常规报告应强调整体疾病负荷评估(「森林而非树木」),清晰描述混合缓解、癌栓及肝外病变。
  • 系统与局部治疗重叠时,采用分区方法(「森林与树木」)整合RECIST或mRECIST与LI-RADS治疗反应算法。
  • 免疫治疗时代需注意假性进展和超进展等非典型反应模式,但在HCC中仍不常见。

局限性

  • 为综述性文章,未报告系统检索策略与纳入文献数量,证据整合方法不明确。
  • 灌注成像、影像组学和人工智能建模等高级技术仍主要处于研究阶段。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone rapid transformation over the past decade, significantly expanding treatment options and improving survival for patients with advanced disease. Guided by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, systemic therapy is primarily indicated for advanced-stage HCC and select intermediate-stage cases with preserved liver function. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination regimens have redefined first-line therapy, demonstrating substantial improvements in overall survival and response rates. As systemic and locoregional treatments increasingly converge, radiologists are encountering more complex imaging scenarios requiring nuanced interpretation. Assessment of treatment response in HCC relies on integration of imaging findings, biomarkers, and clinical parameters. Although Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 remains the primary response assessment method in clinical trials, its size-based criteria may not fully capture biologic response in HCC, where therapy can induce necrosis or decreased vascularity without substantial tumor shrinkage. Modified RECIST (mRECIST), which evaluates viable enhancing tumor, may better reflect treatment effect in certain contexts; however, higher response rates by mRECIST have not consistently translated into improved overall survival. Atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression may further complicate evaluation in the immunotherapy era but remain uncommon in HCC. Emerging evidence suggests that combining systemic therapy with locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiation therapy may improve disease control and survival in selected patients, further increasing imaging complexity. In routine clinical practice, radiology reports should emphasize global disease burden assessment, "the forest, not the trees," while clearly describing mixed responses, tumor-in-vein, and extrahepatic disease. In cases of temporally overlapping systemic and locoregional therapies, a compartmentalized approach integrating RECIST or mRECIST principles with LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for recently treated lesions, "the forest and the trees," is recommended to support multidisciplinary decision-making. Advanced imaging techniques including perfusion imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence-based modeling offer promising tools for earlier and more precise response assessment but remain largely investigational. As therapeutic paradigms continue to evolve, radiologists play a central role in guiding management decisions. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach that integrates imaging interpretation with clinical context and treatment history is essential to accurately assess response and optimize care in patients with HCC receiving systemic therapy.

来源:Abdom Radiol (NY),查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Zand KA, Kim TH, Mukherji R, et al. Review of systemic therapy in HCC with an approach to response assessment in clinical practice. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2026. PMID: 42207294. doi:10.1007/s00261-026-05571-5

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。