文献速递胸部技术与安全PETCT

整合生境放射组学与2.5D深度特征的非小细胞肺癌PD-L1 TPS≥50%无创预测

Integration of habitat radiomics and 2.5D deep features from 18F-FDG PET/CT for noninvasive prediction of PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% in non-small cell lung cancer.
PubMed 文献 · Eur J Radiol · 2026-05-26

该回顾性双中心研究纳入224例经病理确诊的非小细胞肺癌患者,基于治疗前18F-FDG PET/CT提取生境放射组学特征与2.5D深度特征,构建模型预测PD-L1 TPS≥50%。2.5D深度特征模型在外部验证集AUC达0.918,联合模型在测试集AUC为0.894,显示基于PET/CT的无创影像框架有望作为预测PD-L1表达状态的候选影像生物标志物。

要点

  • 2.5D深度特征模型外部验证AUC最高(0.918),F1评分0.783。
  • 生境放射组学外部验证AUC 0.840,优于传统放射组学0.794。
  • 反映肿瘤内异质性的深度与生境特征为主要预测贡献因素。

核心结论

  • 基于18F-FDG PET/CT整合生境放射组学与2.5D深度特征的框架在无创评估NSCLC PD-L1表达状态方面表现出良好性能。
  • 联合模型在测试集与外部验证集间表现出均衡的预测性能,可作为候选影像生物标志物。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性双中心研究,共纳入224例经病理确诊的NSCLC患者,均行治疗前18F-FDG PET/CT及PD-L1免疫组化。
  • 医院1患者随机分为训练集138例和测试集42例,医院2患者44例作为独立外部验证集。
  • PD-L1表达二分类为低表达(TPS<50%)与高表达(TPS≥50%)。
  • 从PET和CT图像提取放射组学特征,采用K-means聚类生成生境亚区。
  • 2.5D深度特征采用基于ResNet-50的特征提取策略结合最大强度投影提取。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • 生境放射组学外部验证AUC为0.840,传统放射组学外部验证AUC为0.794。
  • 2.5D深度特征模型外部验证AUC为0.918,F1评分为0.783。
  • 联合模型测试集AUC为0.894,外部验证敏感度为0.769,外部验证AUC和F1评分略低于2.5D深度特征模型。
  • SHAP分析显示深度特征与反映肿瘤内异质性的生境放射组学特征为主要预测贡献因素,传统代谢参数影响有限。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 阅片时可关注PET/CT图像中反映肿瘤内异质性的生境亚区分布及深度特征,这些是模型预测PD-L1高表达的主要贡献因素。
  • 传统代谢参数对PD-L1表达状态的预测贡献有限,不应作为主要依据。
  • 联合模型在测试集与外部验证集间性能均衡,但外部验证AUC与F1略低于2.5D深度特征模型,选择模型时需结合场景权衡。

局限性

  • 回顾性研究设计。
  • 样本量有限(共224例),需更大规模多中心研究进一步验证。
  • 临床应用前尚需纳入免疫治疗反应与生存结局的前瞻性验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a noninvasive imaging framework based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for estimating programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by integrating habitat radiomics and 2.5D deep features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective two-center study included 224 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. Patients from Hospital 1 were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 138) and a test cohort (n = 42), while patients from Hospital 2 served as an independent external validation cohort (n = 44). PD-L1 expression was dichotomized as low (TPS < 50%) or high (TPS ≥ 50%). Radiomics features were extracted from PET and CT images, and habitat subregions were generated using K-means clustering. 2.5D deep features were extracted using a ResNet-50-based feature-extraction strategy with maximum-intensity projections. Prediction models were constructed using support vector machine, XGBoost, logistic regression, random forest, and artificial neural network classifiers, and were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence intervals, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, and balanced accuracy. SHAP was applied to enhance the visualization and interpretability of the models.

RESULTS: Habitat radiomics demonstrated superior discriminative performance compared with conventional radiomics across cohorts, particularly in the external validation cohort (AUC = 0.840 vs 0.794). The 2.5D deep-feature model achieved the highest discriminative ability in external validation (AUC = 0.918), indicating favorable generalizability. The 2.5D deep-feature model achieved the highest external-validation AUC and F1 score among the representative models (AUC = 0.918; F1 score = 0.783). The combined model achieved the highest AUC in the test cohort (AUC = 0.894) and showed favorable sensitivity in external validation (0.769), although its external-validation AUC and F1 score were slightly lower than those of the 2.5D deep-feature model. SHAP analysis revealed that deep features and habitat radiomics features reflecting intratumoral heterogeneity were the primary contributors to model predictions, whereas conventional metabolic parameters showed limited impact.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the proposed 18F-FDG PET/CT-based framework integrating habitat radiomics and 2.5D deep features showed promising performance for noninvasive estimation of PD-L1 expression status in NSCLC. The combined model demonstrated balanced predictive performance across the test and external validation cohorts, suggesting its potential as a candidate imaging biomarker. Further validation in larger multicenter studies is warranted. However, further prospective validation incorporating immunotherapy-response and survival outcomes is required before clinical application.

来源:Eur J Radiol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Yang F, Wang D, Wang D, et al. Integration of habitat radiomics and 2.5D deep features from 18F-FDG PET/CT for noninvasive prediction of PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2026. PMID: 42214904. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112949

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。