低剂量CT筛查后确诊肺癌患者的生存分析
单中心回顾性研究纳入2015至2020年低剂量CT筛查后确诊肺癌的141例患者,平均年龄68.5岁,78.7%为筛查检出,I期占49.6%。
要点
- 筛查检出肺癌占多数但5年生存率仅53.4%,低于NLST试验
- 非筛查检出肺癌的死亡风险约为筛查检出的3倍
- 分期>1期与更高死亡率显著相关
核心结论
- 筛查检出肺癌与更低死亡率相关,但本中心筛查患者的死亡率高于国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST),提示临床试验结果与单中心临床实践可能存在差异。
研究设计与样本
- 单中心学术医疗中心回顾性研究,纳入2015年1月1日至2020年6月30日接受肺癌筛查并于2021年6月30日前确诊肺癌的141例患者,随访至2024年5月30日。
诊断标准与关键数值
- 估计5年生存率(95%CI)为53.4%(45.4-62.9%)。
- 中位随访3.1年和5.2年时死亡率分别为337例/10万人年和317例/10万人年。
临床应用与阅片要点
- 阅片及报告时应重视筛查检出肺癌的随访与管理,认识到临床实践中筛查患者的生存可能低于试验数据。
- 报告需明确记录肺癌分期及是否为筛查检出,以辅助预后评估。
局限性
- 单中心回顾性研究,样本量有限(141例),结果外推需谨慎。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival and mortality in individuals diagnosed with lung cancer after lung cancer screening (LCS), and the association of mortality with patient and cancer characteristics.
METHODS: Retrospective study at an academic medical center including patients receiving LCS between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020, and diagnosed with lung cancer through June 30, 2021, were included. Patients with lung cancer were followed in the electronic health record through May 30, 2024, to determine vital status and patient and cancer characteristics. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Mortality rates were calculated as the number of deaths divided by total person-years. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate associations between mortality and patient and cancer characteristics.
RESULTS: In all, 141 individuals with lung cancer were included. Mean age (SD) at diagnosis was 68.5 (6.3) years. Most individuals (111 of 141, 78.7%) had screen-detected lung cancer. Stage I cancer was most common (70 of 141, 49.6%). Estimated 5-year survival (95% confidence interval) was 53.4% (45.4-62.9%). Mortality at median follow-up times of 3.1 and 5.2 years was 337 deaths and 317 deaths per 100,000 person-years, respectively. At multivariable analysis, higher cancer stage and non-screen-detected lung cancer status were associated with higher mortality (P < .001 for any stage >1; hazard ratio of screen-detected versus non-screen-detected cancer [95% confidence interval]: 3.16 [1.77-5.66]).
DISCUSSION: Though screen-detected cancers were associated with lower mortality, mortality in screened patients with lung cancer was higher than the National Lung Screening Trial, showing outcomes in our single-center clinical LCS may differ from prior LCS research trials.
引用
- Harowicz MR, Chai J, Thomas S, et al. Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Lung Cancer After Low-Dose CT Screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2026. PMID: 42107675. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2026.05.006
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。