文献速递神经MR

整合ConvNeXt Tiny与影像组学的列线图鉴别胶质瘤真性进展与假性进展

Integrating ConvNeXt tiny and radiomics in a nomogram to differentiate true progression from pseudoprogression in glioma.
PubMed 文献 · Neuroradiology · 2026-05-09

这项多中心回顾性研究纳入293例胶质瘤患者(真性进展208例、假性进展85例),基于基线多参数MRI提取传统影像组学特征和ConvNeXt Tiny深度学习特征构建深度学习影像组学列线图。该列线图在测试集AUC达0.908,显著优于任何单一特征及两位高年资放射科医生的独立评估,并能提升放射科医生的诊断性能。

要点

  • 列线图测试集AUC为0.908,优于单一影像特征和放射科医生独立评估。
  • 列线图作为决策支持工具可显著提升放射科医生鉴别真性/假性进展的能力。
  • 传统影像组学联合深度学习特征及临床因素可提高TP/PsP鉴别效能。

核心结论

  • 深度学习影像组学列线图在鉴别胶质瘤真性进展与假性进展方面表现优异,优于传统方法和放射科医生,可有效辅助临床决策。

研究设计与样本

  • 多中心回顾性研究,纳入293例胶质瘤患者,其中真性进展208例、假性进展85例。
  • 分析基线多参数MRI,提取传统影像组学特征和预训练ConvNeXt Tiny网络深度学习特征。
  • 通过可重复性、冗余性和LASSO分析筛选特征构建影像标签,结合临床因素开发深度学习影像组学列线图。
  • 采用ROC分析、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评估模型性能,并与放射科医生评估比较。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • 列线图在测试集AUC为0.908。
  • 列线图性能显著优于任何单一影像标签(DeLong检验,P < 0.001)。
  • 列线图性能显著优于两位高年资放射科医生的独立评估。
  • 列线图作为决策支持工具时,训练集和测试集净重分类改善均大于1.1(均P < 0.01)。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 可将列线图作为决策支持工具,辅助放射科医生鉴别胶质瘤真性进展与假性进展。
  • 使用时应结合基线多参数MRI,注意模型基于传统影像组学与深度学习特征联合临床因素构建。

局限性

  • 本研究为回顾性设计。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

PURPOSE: Differentiating true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in glioma is challenging due to overlapping enhancement patterns on conventional MRI. Therefore, a reliable noninvasive approach integrating imaging heterogeneity is needed to improve TP/PsP discrimination.

METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 293 patients with true progression (TP, n = 208) or pseudoprogression (PsP, n = 85). Baseline multiparametric MRI was analyzed. Traditional radiomics and deep learning features extracted using a pre-trained ConvNeXt Tiny network were selected through reproducibility, redundancy, and LASSO analyses to construct imaging signatures, which were combined with clinical factors to develop a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN). Model performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, and compared with radiologists' assessments.

RESULTS: The DLRN demonstrated excellent predictive efficacy, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 in the test set. Its performance significantly surpassed that of any individual signature (DeLong test, P < 0.001) and the independent assessments of two senior radiologists. The model exhibited good calibration, and decision curve analysis confirmed its superior clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. When used as a decision-support tool, the nomogram significantly and consistently improved both radiologists' diagnostic performance, yielding a net reclassification improvement greater than 1.1 in both the training and test sets (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The deep learning imaging biomarker nomogram demonstrated excellent performance in differentiating TP from PsP in gliomas, outperforming traditional methods and radiologists, and effectively assisting clinical decision-making.

来源:Neuroradiology,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Zheng T, Yang L, Zhang D, et al. Integrating ConvNeXt tiny and radiomics in a nomogram to differentiate true progression from pseudoprogression in glioma. Neuroradiology. 2026. PMID: 42105112. doi:10.1007/s00234-026-04024-6

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。