脊髓顺应性作为疑似脑脊液漏且脊髓造影无定位患者经验性硬膜外血贴疗效的候选生理标志物
本研究回顾性分析44例临床疑似自发性颅内低压但脊髓造影无定位的患者,评估脊髓顺应性与经验性硬膜外血贴持续临床获益的关系。结论提示较高脊髓顺应性与经验性血贴后持续获益可能性相关。
要点
- 对于脊髓造影无定位的疑似脑脊液漏患者,脊髓顺应性较高者经验性血贴后持续获益可能性更大。
- 顺应性单独分析未达统计学显著性(P=0.17),联合性别模型AUC=0.71(95%CI 0.56-0.86)。
- 开放压力提供补充信息(AUC=0.67,95%CI 0.52-0.82),可与顺应性联合解读。
英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with clinically suspected spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) but non-localizing myelography frequently undergo empiric epidural blood patching, yet objective physiologic markers to help guide treatment remain limited. Spinal compliance, measured during myelographic pressure-volume augmentation, reflects dynamic pressure-volume behavior of the thecal sac and may capture clinically relevant physiology not evident on static imaging or opening pressure alone. We evaluated whether spinal compliance is associated with clinical response to empiric epidural blood patching in this diagnostically challenging subgroup.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single-center CSF leak program. Patients were included if they had calculable spinal compliance from a non-localizing myelogram, underwent empiric epidural blood patching, and had documented clinical follow-up. Patients with confirmed CSF leaks were excluded. Treatment response was dichotomized as any sustained clinical benefit versus no sustained benefit. Logistic regression was used to assess associations with response, including a clinically informed model incorporating sex as a covariate based on prior literature.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen (32%) reported sustained clinical benefit from empiric blood patching and 30 (68%) did not. Responders demonstrated higher spinal compliance than non-responders (1.48 ± 1.23 vs 1.00 ± 0.44 mL/cmH2O; Cohen's d = 0.52), with a stepwise increase in response rate across compliance tertiles (19%, 38%, 42%). Although compliance alone did not reach significance on univariable analysis (Mann-Whitney p = 0.17; likelihood ratio p = 0.06), a multivariable model incorporating compliance and sex was associated with treatment response (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86; likelihood ratio p = 0.02). Opening pressure also showed complementary signal (AUC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.82; likelihood ratio p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected spinal CSF leak and non-localizing myelography, higher spinal compliance was associated with greater likelihood of sustained benefit after empiric epidural blood patching. The strongest signal emerged when compliance was interpreted within a clinically informed multivariable framework, with opening pressure contributing additional complementary information. These findings support spinal compliance as a promising candidate physiologic marker for prospective study in a subgroup where objective treatment guidance remains limited.
引用
- Callen AL, Jenkins K, Bhaumik D, et al. Spinal Compliance as a Candidate Physiologic Marker of Response to Empiric Epidural Blood Patching in Patients with Suspected CSF Leak and Non-Localizing Myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2026. PMID: 42209147. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A9432
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。