文献速递神经外周血管MR

多对比MRI深度学习影像组学特征自动识别症状性颈动脉斑块:多中心研究

Deep Learning Radiomics Signature from Multicontrast MRI for Automated Identification of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: A Multicenter Study.
PubMed 文献 · AJNR Am J Neuroradiol · 2026-05-04

该回顾性多中心研究纳入355例患者共409条颈动脉,基于多对比MRI自动分割斑块区域提取深度学习与影像组学特征,构建DLR特征并训练机器学习分类器识别症状性颈动脉斑块。DLR模型(逻辑回归)在训练、内部验证和外部验证队列的AUROC分别为0.975、0.933和0.881,显著优于临床模型、纯影像组学模型和纯深度学习模型,且在狭窄程度亚组中性能稳定。

要点

  • DLR模型外部验证AUROC达0.881,优于临床模型(0.711)和纯影像组学模型(0.789)。
  • DLR定义的症状组中复杂VI型斑块比例显著高于无症状组(内部50.0% vs 14.8%)。
  • DLR模型在重度及轻中度狭窄亚组中AUROC均保持在0.863以上。

核心结论

  • 基于多对比MRI的DLR特征可高精度、稳健地自动识别症状性颈动脉斑块,有潜力作为无创工具指导个性化卒中预防。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性多中心研究,纳入355例颈动脉粥样硬化患者的409条颈动脉(训练219条、内部验证95条、外部测试95条)。
  • 在多对比MRI上自动分割斑块区域,提取并融合深度学习与影像组学特征,经3阶段特征筛选优化DLR特征。
  • 采用多种机器学习分类器训练,以AUROC评估性能,并与临床模型、纯影像组学模型及纯深度学习模型比较。

关键影像表现/征象

  • DLR定义的症状组中复杂VI型斑块患病率显著高于无症状组(内部队列50.0% vs 14.8%,P<.001;外部队列48.7% vs 20.7%,P=.004)。
  • DLR定义的症状组中主要钙化VII型斑块患病率显著低于无症状组(外部队列8.1% vs 43.1%,P<.001)。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • DLR模型(逻辑回归)识别症状性斑块的AUROC在训练、内部验证和外部验证队列分别为0.975(95%CI 0.954-0.992)、0.933(95%CI 0.876-0.976)和0.881(95%CI 0.807-0.939)。
  • 临床模型AUROC分别为0.701、0.749、0.711,纯影像组学模型为0.877、0.839、0.789,纯深度学习模型为0.948、0.894、0.845。
  • DLR模型在重度狭窄亚组AUROC为0.895-0.982,在轻中度狭窄亚组为0.863-0.971。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 可基于多对比MRI自动分割斑块并提取DLR特征,辅助识别症状性颈动脉斑块,弥补仅依赖狭窄程度的不足。
  • DLR风险分组与AHA VI型复杂斑块及VII型钙化斑块相关,阅片时可关注斑块成分构成。
  • 模型在轻中度及重度狭窄亚组中性能稳定,对非重度狭窄患者的风险分层亦有参考价值。

局限性

  • 本研究为回顾性设计,可能存在选择偏倚。
  • 外部测试样本量有限(95条颈动脉),需更大规模前瞻性验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic stroke poses a significant global health burden. Accurately identifying symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques, beyond relying solely on stenosis degree, remains a critical challenge for precise stroke risk stratification. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning radiomics (DLR) signature based on multicontrast MRI to identify symptomatic carotid plaques accurately.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 409 carotid arteries from 355 patients with carotid atherosclerosis were enrolled (219 training, 95 internal validation, 95 external test). Deep learning (DL) and radiomics features were extracted and combined from automatically segmented plaque regions on multicontrast MRI. The optimized DLR signature derived from a 3-stage feature selection pipeline was leveraged to train diverse machine learning classifiers for robust identification of symptomatic carotid plaques. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared against clinical models, radiomics-only models, and DL-only models. Subgroup analysis across stenosis severities and comparison of MRI-based American Heart Association lesion types between DLR-defined risk groups were performed.

RESULTS: The DLR model with logistic regression demonstrated excellent performance in identifying symptomatic plaques, achieving AUROCs of 0.975 (95% CI, 0.954-0.992), 0.933 (95% CI, 0.876-0.976), and 0.881 (95% CI, 0.807-0.939) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. It significantly outperformed the clinical model (AUROCs of 0.701, 0.749, 0.711; P < .05), radiomics-only model (AUROCs of 0.877, 0.839, 0.789; P < .05), and DL-only model (AUROCs of 0.948, 0.894, 0.845; P < .05 in training/external). Performance remained consistently high across stenosis severity subgroups (AUROCs of 0.895-0.982 for severe, 0.863-0.971 for mild-moderate stenosis). DLR-defined symptomatic groups showed significantly higher prevalence of complex type VI lesions (internal: 50.0% versus 14.8%, P < .001; external: 48.7% versus 20.7%, P = .004) and lower prevalence of predominantly calcified type VII lesions (external: 8.1% versus 43.1%, P < .001) compared with asymptomatic groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The developed multicontrast MRI-based DLR signature provides a highly accurate and robust tool for the automated identification of symptomatic carotid plaques, underscoring its potential value as a noninvasive tool to guide personalized stroke prevention strategies.

来源:AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Gai Q, Zhou J, Zhang Y, et al. Deep Learning Radiomics Signature from Multicontrast MRI for Automated Identification of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: A Multicenter Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2026. PMID: 42082316. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A9175

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。