文献速递妇产影像泌尿生殖技术与安全US

基于大语言模型的超声叙述性报告自动O-RADS风险分层

Automated O-RADS Risk Stratification Using a Large Language Model Analysis of Narrative Ultrasound Reports.
PubMed 文献 · Ultrasound Med Biol · 2026-04-11

本研究开发两阶段流程,先用医学大语言模型Lingshu从卵巢病变自由文本描述中提取特征,再用逻辑回归等机器学习算法预测O-RADS评分1-5分。在513例数据五折交叉验证中,Lingshu嵌入联合逻辑回归达到最高准确率0.803、加权F1 0.819、宏平均AUROC 0.948,优于MedGemma流程,可提高工作流效率并减少诊断差异。

要点

  • Lingshu特征嵌入联合逻辑回归自动预测O-RADS评分的准确率为0.803,宏平均AUROC为0.948。
  • 该流程性能优于MedGemma流程,后者准确率0.760、宏平均AUROC 0.941。
  • 方法可辅助放射科医生更一致、及时地评估卵巢病变风险,减少观察者间差异。

核心结论

  • 使用大语言模型提取超声报告特征并结合传统机器学习可自动、准确地完成O-RADS风险分层,有潜力提高临床工作流效率并减少诊断变异性。

研究设计与样本

  • 研究为方法学开发与评估,采用两阶段流程:先由医学大语言模型Lingshu从自由文本中提取特征,再训练逻辑回归、支持向量机和随机森林预测O-RADS评分1-5分。
  • 评估数据集包含513例,采用五折交叉验证,并与MedGemma模型流程进行比较。

诊断标准与关键数值

  • Lingshu嵌入联合逻辑回归的准确率为0.803(95%CI 0.753-0.853),加权平均F1为0.819(95%CI 0.777-0.861),宏平均AUROC为0.948(95%CI 0.937-0.959)。
  • MedGemma流程的准确率为0.760(95%CI 0.700-0.820),F1为0.787(95%CI 0.739-0.835),AUROC为0.941(95%CI 0.911-0.971)。

临床应用与阅片要点

  • 该自动化方法可基于超声叙述性报告辅助生成O-RADS评分,有望减少手动评分耗时和观察者间差异。
  • 临床使用时需注意模型输出为辅助建议,最终O-RADS评分仍应由放射科医生结合图像确认。

局限性

  • 研究采用五折交叉验证评估,原文未报告外部独立验证集,泛化能力有待进一步确认。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

BACKGROUND: The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is essential for standardizing the risk stratification of ovarian lesions detected on ultrasound. However, manual assignment of O-RADS scores is time-consuming and can vary between observers. This study investigates an automated method for O-RADS scoring using a large language model (LLM) to analyze narrative ultrasound reports.

METHODS: A two-stage pipeline was developed for automated O-RADS classification. Initially, the Lingshu LLM, specialized in medical language, extracted and embedded features from free-text descriptions of ovarian lesions. It identified key diagnostic features mentioned by sonologists. Subsequently, these features were used to train and evaluate several machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machines and random forests, to predict O-RADS scores (1-5).

RESULTS: The proposed method was evaluated on a dataset of 513 cases using fivefold cross-validation. The pipeline using Lingshu model embeddings with LR achieved the highest accuracy of 0.803 [95% CI: 0.753, 0.853], a weighted-average F1-score of 0.819 [95% CI: 0.777, 0.861] and a macro-averaged AUROC of 0.948 [95% CI: 0.937, 0.959]. This outperformed the MedGemma model's pipeline, which had an accuracy of 0.760 [95% CI: 0.700, 0.820], F1-score of 0.787 [95% CI: 0.739, 0.835] and AUROC of 0.941 [95% CI: 0.911, 0.971].

CONCLUSION: This study introduces a novel approach to automate O-RADS scoring using LLMs for feature extraction and traditional machine learning for classification. The results indicate that this method can accurately stratify ovarian cancer risk, potentially improving clinical workflow efficiency and reducing diagnostic variability. This approach may support radiologists in making more consistent and timely assessments.

来源:Ultrasound Med Biol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Guo Y, Gong J, Jiang R, et al. Automated O-RADS Risk Stratification Using a Large Language Model Analysis of Narrative Ultrasound Reports. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2026. PMID: 41966937. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.03.009

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。