指南与共识心力衰竭与心肌病

LAQUA-HF随机试验:指南导向药物治疗策略对心衰患者健康状态结局的影响

Comprehensive guideline-directed medical therapy strategies on health status outcomes in patients with heart failure: the LAQUA-HF randomised clinical trial.
指南 / 共识 · Heart · 2026-05-14

LAQUA-HF为多中心、开放标签、2×2析因随机试验,纳入231例有症状心衰患者(中位年龄73岁,中位LVEF 36%),比较沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净、托拉塞米与呋塞米对6个月KCCQ-OSS变化的影响。结果显示两种药物比较策略在健康状态和分层临床结局上均无显著差异,但样本量限制不能排除 modest 差异。

要点

  • 沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净对6个月KCCQ-OSS变化无显著差异(校正均差2.53分,95%CI -1.81至6.88,p=0.25)。
  • 托拉塞米与呋塞米对6个月KCCQ-OSS变化无显著差异(0.25分,95%CI -4.10至4.59,p=0.91)。
  • 分层复合结局分析同样未显示沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净或托拉塞米与呋塞米之间存在显著差异。

核心结论

  • 在6个月健康状态结局上,未发现沙库巴曲/缬沙坦优于达格列净或托拉塞米优于呋塞米的证据。
  • 鉴于样本量和预设把握度,不能排除治疗间存在 modest 差异。

研究设计与样本

  • 多中心、开放标签、随机、2×2析因设计试验,于2022年1月至2024年2月进行。
  • 纳入231例门诊有症状心衰患者,利钠肽水平升高且LVEF<50%,尽管已接受常规治疗(如RAAS抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂)。
  • 患者被分配接受沙库巴曲/缬沙坦或达格列净,以及托拉塞米或呋塞米。

主要发现

  • 中位年龄73岁,中位LVEF 36%,84.0%为NYHA II级。
  • 沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净比较:KCCQ-OSS校正均差2.53分(95%CI -1.81至6.88;p=0.25)。
  • 托拉塞米与呋塞米比较:KCCQ-OSS校正均差0.25分(95%CI -4.10至4.59;p=0.91)。
  • 分层复合结局:沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净win ratio 1.15(95%CI 0.71至1.88);托拉塞米与呋塞米win ratio 1.15(95%CI 0.70至1.85)。

临床怎么用

  • 对于LVEF<50%的有症状心衰患者,沙库巴曲/缬沙坦与达格列净在6个月健康状态改善上未见显著差异,临床选择可综合考虑耐受性、费用及患者偏好。
  • 托拉塞米与呋塞米在6个月健康状态上未见显著差异,袢利尿剂选择可依据临床实际情况。

局限性

  • 样本量有限(231例),预设把握度下不能排除治疗间 modest 差异。
  • 开放标签设计可能引入偏倚。
  • 研究人群以NYHA II级为主,结论外推需谨慎。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: Introduction of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has transformed the care of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, establishing four foundational drug classes. Yet, in clinical practice, many patients cannot initiate or maintain all four, and clinicians must pragmatically prioritise agents such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, whose comparative impacts are still explored. Moreover, the optimal loop diuretic to pair with modern GDMT, which enhances natriuresis, remains uncertain. METHODS: Between January 2022 and February 2024, we conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised, 2×2 factorial design trial for ambulatory patients with symptomatic HF, elevated natriuretic peptide levels and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, despite conventional therapies (eg, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers). The patients were assigned to receive either sacubitril/valsartan or dapagliflozin, and torsemide or furosemide. The primary endpoint was the change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS) over 6 months; a prespecified secondary endpoint was a hierarchical clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of 231 randomised patients (median age 73 years; median LVEF 36%; 84.0% New York Heart Association class II), changes in KCCQ-OSS did not differ between sacubitril/valsartan and dapagliflozin (adjusted mean difference 2.53 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.81 to 6.88; p=0.25) or between torsemide and furosemide (0.25 points; 95% CI -4.10 to 4.59; p=0.91). Hierarchical composite outcome analyses also showed no significant differences between sacubitril/valsartan and dapagliflozin (win ratio, 1.15; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.88), or between torsemide and furosemide (win ratio, 1.15; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.85). CONCLUSIONS: This trial found no evidence of benefit of one treatment over another for health status over 6 months. Given the sample size and predefined power, modest differences between treatments cannot be excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000045229.

来源:Heart,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Shiraishi, Ikemura, Ueda, et al. Comprehensive guideline-directed medical therapy strategies on health status outcomes in patients with heart failure: the LAQUA-HF randomised clinical trial. Heart. 2026. PMID: 42009572. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327642

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。