文献速递冠心病

额面T波轴偏移与冠状动脉综合征患者心脏性猝死风险

Frontal T-wave axis deviation and risk of sudden cardiac death in coronary syndromes.
PubMed 文献 · Heart · 2026-05-12

该回顾性队列分析18 828例冠状动脉造影患者,发现额面T波轴(TA)偏移程度与心脏性猝死(SCD)风险呈梯度相关,在择期(慢性冠脉综合征)和急性冠脉综合征后恢复期患者中尤为显著,且独立于左心室射血分数(LVEF)。

要点

  • 严重异常TA(<-75°或>165°)在择期患者中SCD风险HR 4.06,急性患者HR 2.01。
  • TA偏移的预测价值在急性造影后30-365天的心电图中仍显著(HR 2.69)。
  • QRSTA亦与SCD相关但较弱,TA可作为超越LVEF的额外风险分层工具。

核心结论

  • 额面T波轴偏移程度是冠状动脉造影患者SCD风险的稳健梯度标志物,在择期和急性后恢复期设置中最强,QRSTA支持但较弱。

研究设计与样本

  • 芬兰坦佩雷大学医院2007-2018年回顾性连续队列,纳入18 828例冠状动脉造影患者(择期10 303例,急性8 525例),中位随访9.0年和7.8年。

主要发现

  • 择期队列中,严重异常TA(<-75°或>165°)的SCD风险HR 4.06(95%CI 2.94-5.61),严重异常QRSTA(≥151°)HR 3.16(2.35-4.24)。
  • 急性队列中,严重异常TA的HR 2.01(1.42-2.86),QRSTA的HR 1.73(1.24-2.39),效应较小且非单调。
  • 急性造影后30-365天心电图敏感性队列(n=5529)中,严重异常TA的HR 2.69(1.70-4.24),QRSTA不显著。
  • 排除LVEF≤35%患者后,TA/QRSTA与SCD的关联持续存在。

临床怎么用

  • 自动测量的额面T波轴偏移可低成本地辅助SCD风险分层,尤其在择期和急性后恢复期患者中,可能补充LVEF的不足。

局限性

  • 回顾性单中心设计,需外部验证和临床效用测试。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: Frontal T-wave axis (TA) and QRS-T angle (QRSTA) are automated ECG measures that reflect depolarisation-repolarisation abnormalities-and have been linked to mortality. We tested whether increasing deviation in TA/QRSTA predicts adjudicated sudden cardiac death (SCD) events in patients undergoing coronary angiography-elective (chronic coronary syndrome) and acute (acute coronary syndrome)-and whether signals differ when ECGs are recorded post-acute. METHODS: Retrospective consecutive cohort at Tampere University Hospital, 2007-2018. Exposures were automatically measured frontal TA and QRSTA (Marquette 12SL). Primary endpoint was SCD event (true SCD, resuscitated SCA or implantable cardioverter defibrillator-terminated VF/very fast ventricular tachycardia) adjudicated to guideline definitions, with Fine-Gray competing-risk models adjusted for clinical covariates. Follow-up through 31 December 2022. RESULTS: We analysed 18 828 patients (elective n=10 303; acute n=8525; median follow-up 9.0 and 7.8 years). In the elective cohort, SCD hazard increased monotonically with TA/QRSTA deviation; severely abnormal TA (<-75° or >165°) HR 4.06 (95% CI 2.94 to 5.61) and severely abnormal QRSTA (≥151°) HR 3.16 (2.35-4.24). Associations persisted after excluding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In the acute cohort, effects were smaller and non-monotonic (severely abnormal TA HR 2.01 (1.42-2.86); QRSTA HR 1.73 (1.24-2.39)). In a sensitivity cohort with ECGs 30-365 days postangiography (acute 30, n=5529), the TA-SCD association resembled the elective setting (severely abnormal TA HR 2.69 (1.70-4.24)); QRSTA was not significant. CONCLUSION: Severity of frontal TA deviation is a robust, graded marker of SCD risk in angiography patients, strongest in elective and postacute settings; QRSTA is supportive but weaker. These automated, low-cost metrics could augment SCD risk stratification beyond LVEF, warranting external validation and clinical utility testing.

来源:Heart,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Kivimäki, Rankinen, Lyytikäinen, et al. Frontal T-wave axis deviation and risk of sudden cardiac death in coronary syndromes. Heart. 2026. PMID: 41218927. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325879

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。