文献速递癫痫脑血管病

美国癫痫结局的城乡差异

Rural-Urban Disparities in Epilepsy Outcomes in the United States.
PubMed 文献 · Neurology · 2026-06-03

该回顾性队列研究利用美国全国住院患者样本(2016-2021)纳入841,445例癫痫住院患者,评估城乡居住地与癫痫结局的关联。调整协变量后,最农村县患者院内死亡、癫痫持续状态就诊和延长住院的比值显著更高,接受脑电图和非例行出院的比值更低;在私人保险患者中部分关联消失。

要点

  • 农村癫痫患者院内死亡比值约为最城市患者的1.93倍。
  • 农村患者更常以癫痫持续状态就诊且住院时间延长。
  • 私人保险亚组中城乡差异减弱,提示可干预的结构性障碍。

核心结论

  • 农村程度增加与癫痫结局显著恶化相关,包括院内死亡比值近乎翻倍。
  • 私人保险患者中差异减弱,提示可改变的结构性障碍而非地理本身驱动城乡差异。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性队列研究,使用美国全国住院患者样本(2016-2021)。
  • 纳入主要诊断为癫痫及复发性发作的患者,共841,445例住院,中位年龄56岁,47.2%为女性。
  • 暴露为基于国家卫生统计中心城乡分类方案的患者农村程度。

主要发现

  • 最农村县患者相对最城市县患者院内死亡OR 1.93(95%CI 1.56-2.39,p<0.001)。
  • 最农村县患者以癫痫持续状态就诊OR 1.32(95%CI 1.24-1.41,p<0.001)。
  • 最农村县患者延长住院OR 1.29(95%CI 1.19-1.41,p<0.001)。
  • 最农村县患者接受脑电图OR 0.88(95%CI 0.77-1.00,p=0.047),非例行出院OR 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96,p=0.001)。
  • 仅私人保险患者亚组中,农村程度与死亡、癫痫持续状态就诊及延长住院的关联不再观察到。

临床怎么用

  • 应关注农村癫痫患者的可及性障碍,因其与更高的院内死亡和癫痫持续状态风险相关。
  • 私人保险亚组差异减弱提示改善保险覆盖或转诊结构可能减少城乡结局差距。

局限性

  • 观察性研究存在残余混杂。
  • 临床数据粒度有限。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rural residence is linked to poor access to neurologists and specialized epilepsy centers, yet its impact on clinical epilepsy outcomes remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed the association between rurality and epilepsy outcomes in a nationally representative cohort in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), including patients with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy and recurrent seizures. The primary exposure was patient rurality, defined using the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Logistic regression models were used to study the effect of rurality on in-hospital mortality, presenting in status epilepticus, prolonged length of stay, nonroutine discharge, and receipt of EEG. Models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and hospital-related characteristics and Elixhauser comorbidities. Subanalyses examined patients presenting in status epilepticus, those with private insurance, and those admitted to urban teaching hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 841,445 epilepsy admissions were included (median age 56 years, 47.2% female). After adjusting for covariates, patients from the most rural counties experienced significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.93 [95% CI 1.56-2.39], p < 0.001), presenting in status epilepticus (OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.24-1.41], p < 0.001), and prolonged length of stay (OR 1.29 [95% CI 1.19-1.41], p < 0.001), relative to patients from the most urban counties. The most rural patients also experienced lower odds of receiving EEG (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.77-1.00], p = 0.047) and nonroutine discharge (OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.85-0.96], p = 0.001). When subanalyzing only patients with private insurance, the associations between rurality and mortality, presenting in status epilepticus, and prolonged length of stay were no longer observed. DISCUSSION: Increasing rurality was associated with markedly worse epilepsy outcomes, including nearly double the odds of in-hospital mortality. The attenuation of these disparities among privately insured patients suggests that modifiable structural barriers drive rural-urban disparities, rather than geography alone. Inherent to observational studies, residual confounding and limited clinical granularity remain important considerations. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted public health interventions to improve outcomes for rural epilepsy populations.

来源:Neurology,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Bader ER, Kemball-Cook WS, Benton JA, et al. Rural-Urban Disparities in Epilepsy Outcomes in the United States. Neurology. 2026. PMID: 42234954. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000218053

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。