文献速递认知障碍与痴呆

三级记忆门诊中符合LATE临床标准个体的特征分析

Characterizing Individuals Fulfilling Clinical Criteria for Limbic-Predominant Age-Related TDP-43 Encephalopathy in a Tertiary Memory Clinic.
PubMed 文献 · Neurology · 2026-04-16

该研究在阿姆斯特丹阿尔茨海默中心纵向记忆门诊队列中,回顾性纳入3,606例年龄>50岁的轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆患者,基于基线认知、萎缩、淀粉样蛋白和tau状态将其分为可能LATE、疑似LATE、LATE合并AD及单纯AD组。结果显示,8.2%的MCI或痴呆患者被归为可能LATE、疑似LATE或LATE-AD;可能LATE的疾病进展较AD更慢,而LATE-AD进展更快。

要点

  • 8.2%的MCI或痴呆患者符合LATE相关临床分类。
  • 可能LATE的认知和功能进展较单纯AD更慢。
  • LATE-AD进展较单纯AD更快,提示预后更差。

核心结论

  • 在三级记忆门诊中,基于临床标准可将部分MCI或痴呆患者分类为可能LATE、疑似LATE或LATE-AD,且这些亚组的临床轨迹与单纯AD不同。
  • 可能LATE的疾病进展较AD更慢,而LATE-AD的疾病进展较AD更快,支持使用该临床标准提高诊断和预后准确性。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性分析阿姆斯特丹阿尔茨海默中心纵向记忆门诊队列,纳入年龄>50岁的MCI和痴呆患者。
  • 共3,606例可分类个体,基线平均年龄66岁(SD 6),女性占49.2%。
  • 基于基线认知、萎缩、淀粉样蛋白状态和tau状态进行分类。

主要发现

  • 56例(1.6%)为可能LATE,115例(3.2%)为疑似LATE,127例(3.5%)为LATE-AD,1,675例(46.5%)为AD。
  • 可能LATE在MMSE、记忆、注意力、执行功能和视空间功能上的进展均较AD更慢。
  • LATE-AD在MMSE、注意力和执行功能上的进展较AD更快。
  • 与AD相比,可能LATE和疑似LATE的颞下回与海马体积比值更高,且可能LATE、疑似LATE和LATE-AD的杏仁核体积均更小。

关键数值与推荐

  • 可能LATE定义为符合LATE临床标准且无AD病理证据的临床分类。
  • 疑似LATE定义为符合LATE临床标准但AD病理状态不明确的临床分类。
  • LATE-AD定义为同时符合LATE临床标准和AD病理的临床分类。
  • AD组为符合AD临床和生物标志物标准且无LATE特征的临床分类。

临床怎么用

  • 在记忆门诊中可依据认知、萎缩、淀粉样蛋白和tau状态对MCI或痴呆患者进行LATE相关临床分类。
  • 可能LATE患者预后相对较好,LATE-AD患者预后较差,分类有助于预后沟通和随访管理。

局限性

  • 本研究为单中心回顾性分析,结果外推需谨慎。
  • LATE分类基于临床标准操作化定义,可能受生物标志物可及性限制。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) is characterized by an amnestic- and limbic-predominant phenotype, which can mimic Alzheimer disease (AD). In a memory clinic cohort, we tested whether clinical criteria for LATE can detect a clinical profile of LATE that is distinct from AD. METHODS: In this retrospective examination of a longitudinal memory clinic cohort from the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, we included individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (aged >50 years). We classified individuals based on baseline data on cognition, atrophy, amyloid-status, and tau-status into Probable- and Possible-LATE, co-occurring LATE and AD (LATE-AD), and AD (without LATE). Next, we compared these groups on demographics, clinical features, cognition, and atrophy. RESULTS: Of 3,606 individuals (mean age at baseline 66 [SD 6], 49.2% female) available for classification, we classified 56 (1.6%) as Probable-LATE, 115 (3.2%) as Possible-LATE, 127 (3.5%) as LATE-AD, and 1,675 (46.5%) as AD. Individuals with Probable-LATE progressed slower than AD on mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (sβ [SE] = 0.12 [0.05], p = 0.02), memory (sβ [SE] = 0.11 [0.5], p = 0.01), attention (sβ [SE] = 0.12 [0.16], p = 0.05), executive functioning (sβ [SE] = 0.09 [0.04], p = 0.03), and visuospatial functioning (sβ [SE] = 0.10 [0.05], p = 0.05). Individuals with LATE-AD progressed faster than AD on MMSE (sβ [SE] = -0.12 [0.05], p = 0.01), attention (sβ [SE] = -0.13 [0.06], p = 0.04), and executive functioning (sβ [SE] = -0.10 [0.05], p = 0.03). Mortality risk, compared to AD, was lower in individuals with Probable-LATE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70 [0.49-0.99], p = 0.04) and higher in Possible LATE-AD (HR 1.25 [1.01-1.53], p = 0.04). Compared to AD, at baseline, individuals with Probable-LATE and Possible-LATE had higher inferior temporal-to-hippocampus ratios (indicating limbic-predominant atrophy; sβ [SE] = 0.59 [0.16], p < 0.01; sβ [SE] = 0.40 [0.13], p < 0.01), and Probable-LATE, Possible-LATE, and LATE-AD all showed smaller amygdalar volumes at baseline than AD (sβ [SE] = -0.55 [0.15], p < 0.01; sβ [SE] = -0.43 [0.12], p < 0.01; sβ [SE] = -0.62 [0.11], p < 0.01). Individuals with LATE-AD had thinner cortex at baseline in an "AD-signature" composite region compared to AD (sβ [SE] = -0.73 [0.11], p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Using an operationalization of clinical criteria for LATE, 8.2% of participants with MCI or dementia from our tertiary memory clinic were classified as Possible-LATE, Probable-LATE, or LATE-AD. Probable-LATE was characterized by a milder disease course than AD, whereas LATE-AD was characterized by a more aggressive disease course. This underscores the value of the proposed clinical criteria in identifying individuals with suspected LATE, who have distinct clinical trajectories from AD. Our findings, therefore, support the use of these criteria to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in the memory clinic.

来源:Neurology,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Groot C, Calandri IL, Bader I, et al. Characterizing Individuals Fulfilling Clinical Criteria for Limbic-Predominant Age-Related TDP-43 Encephalopathy in a Tertiary Memory Clinic. Neurology. 2026. PMID: 41990307. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000214810

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。