文献速递脑血管病

前循环大脑前动脉闭塞血管内取栓与标准药物治疗对比:ORIENTAL-MeVO注册研究

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Standard Medical Management in Acute Anterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The ORIENTAL-MeVO Registry Study.
PubMed 文献 · Stroke · 2026-04-22

该多中心回顾性研究比较了急性大脑前动脉闭塞(ACAo)患者血管内取栓(EVT)与标准药物治疗(SMM)的临床结局。在343例入选患者中,经倾向评分匹配和逆概率加权调整混杂因素后,EVT组90天改良Rankin量表评分分布、良好功能结局和功能独立均显著优于SMM组,且症状性颅内出血和死亡率无显著差异。

要点

  • EVT与ACAo患者90天功能结局改善显著相关,调整后OR为2.14(95%CI 1.59-2.89)。
  • EVT组良好功能结局和功能独立的风险比分别为1.77和2.35,均显著优于SMM。
  • 症状性颅内出血和90天死亡率在两组间无显著差异。

核心结论

  • EVT治疗ACAo与更好的临床结局相关,尤其在中重度卒中患者中,且不增加症状性颅内出血或90天死亡风险。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性多中心注册研究,纳入2019年9月至2024年9月中国25家中心发病24小时内的急性ACAo(A1/A2/A3段)患者343例,接受EVT或SMM。

主要发现

  • 逆概率加权调整后,EVT组90天mRS评分分布显著优于SMM组(调整OR 2.14,95%CI 1.59-2.89,P<0.001)。
  • EVT组良好功能结局率显著更高(调整RR 1.77,95%CI 1.27-2.48,P<0.001)。
  • EVT组功能独立率显著更高(调整RR 2.35,95%CI 1.63-3.39,P<0.001)。
  • 症状性颅内出血和90天死亡率两组无显著差异。
  • 基线NIHSS≥6患者亚组中EVT的次要结局改善更明显。

关键数值与推荐

  • 主要结局为90天mRS评分分布;安全结局包括24小时症状性颅内出血和90天死亡率。
  • 纳入标准:CTA/MRA/DSA证实的ACAo,病前mRS≤2,仅接受EVT或SMM。
  • 排除标准:血栓从近端大动脉迁移至大脑前动脉、多血管 Territory 闭塞、缺少90天mRS数据。

临床怎么用

  • 对于前循环大脑前动脉闭塞的急性缺血性卒中患者,EVT可能改善功能结局,尤其适用于基线NIHSS≥6的中重度卒中患者。

局限性

  • 回顾性研究设计可能存在选择偏倚和未测量混杂因素。
  • 样本量有限(343例),亚组分析结果需进一步验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with stroke with proximal large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation has been confirmed by several randomized controlled trials. However, evidence regarding EVT for anterior cerebral artery occlusion (ACAo) remains limited. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between EVT and standard medical management (SMM) in patients with ACAo. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study examined data from patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by ACAo (A1/A2/A3 segments) within 24 hours of symptom onset across 25 Chinese centers between September 2019 and September 2024. Eligible patients had ACAo verified by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography, a prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2, and received either EVT or SMM exclusively. Patients were excluded due to clot migration from proximal major arteries to the anterior cerebral artery, multiterritory occlusion, or absence of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score data. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score distribution. Safety outcomes encompassed 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality rates. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were conducted to equilibrate baseline confounders between the EVT and SMM groups. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients with ACAo met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled across all participating centers. Following adjustment for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting, the EVT group had statistically significant improvement in 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (adjusted odds ratio, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.59-2.89]; P<0.001), excellent functional outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; P<0.001) and functional independence (adjusted risk ratio, 2.35 [95% CI, 1.63-3.39]; P<0.001) compared with the SMM group. Safety outcomes, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality, showed no significant differences between groups. Subgroup analysis revealed improved secondary outcomes in patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥6. CONCLUSIONS: EVT for ACAo is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with SMM, particularly in patients with moderate to severe stroke, without increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2500096954.

来源:Stroke,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Zhang K, Jing X, Abdalkader M, et al. Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Standard Medical Management in Acute Anterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The ORIENTAL-MeVO Registry Study. Stroke. 2026. PMID: 42017224. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.054127

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。