TEMPO-2亚组：80岁以上轻微卒中替奈普酶溶栓结局更差

原文

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are few high-quality data on thrombolysis outcomes in the oldest patients, especially for minor stroke. We examined safety and efficacy outcomes of thrombolysis in patients older than 80 years, compared with those ≤80 years, in the Tenecteplase Versus Standard of care for Minor Ischaemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2) trial. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the TEMPO-2 randomized controlled trial, we compared outcomes and adverse events in patients with minor stroke and symptomatic intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion lesion within 12 hours of symptom onset, assigned to tenecteplase vs nonthrombolytic standard of care, in those >80 years and ≤80 years. The primary outcome was responder analysis of the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (responder was mRS = 0-1 if premorbid mRS = 0-1, 0-2 if premorbid mRS = 2). Secondary outcomes included neurologic recovery according to the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 5 days/discharge, vessel recanalization, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and adverse events. We used mixed-effects Poisson, ordinal logistic, and quantile regression as appropriate, adjusted for sex, baseline NIHSS, and treatment assignment as fixed-effects and enrolling site as random effects. RESULTS: Among 884 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis (208 [23.5%] >80 years, 365 [41.6%] female). Significant interactions between age and treatment were observed for mRS responder, mRS 0-1, return to baseline function, EQ-5D index, and vessel recanalization. Patients >80 years generally fared worse with tenecteplase for mRS outcomes (mRS 0-1 in 49 [46.2%] vs 61 [59.8%] with control, adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97), while among patients ≤80 years, there was no significant difference (249 [76.4%] vs 260 [74.7%], aRR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03). However, in both age groups, patients were more likely to achieve recanalization of visible occlusions (aRR ≤80 years 2.06, 95% CI 1.60-2.65, >80 years 2.77, 95% CI 2.21-3.47) and NIHSS = 0 at 5 days/discharge when assigned to tenecteplase (aRR ≤80 years 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, >80 years 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.33). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were more frequent with tenecteplase among patients >80 years (risk ratio 2.29, 95% CI 1.27-4.13), particularly hemorrhages and stroke progression/recurrence (any extra/intracranial hemorrhage in 5 [4.7%] vs 0 with standard of care, p = 0.026). DISCUSSION: Older patients (>80 years) with minor stroke and visible occlusion or perfusion lesion assigned to tenecteplase were more likely to achieve recanalization of occlusions and short-term neurologic recovery, as were younger patients, but they experienced worse 90-day outcomes with more frequent hemorrhagic and stroke progression/recurrence-related SAEs. Overall, these results, while post hoc, do not support thrombolysis for minor strokes in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02398656. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that in patients >80 years with minor stroke and visible occlusion or perfusion lesion, IV thrombolysis with tenecteplase is associated with worse functional outcomes at 90 days compared with nonthrombolytic standard of care therapies.