文献速递2 型糖尿病长期管理

司美格鲁肽治疗成人后肌力变化的系统综述与握力荟萃分析

Changes in Muscle Strength Following Semaglutide Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis of Handgrip Strength
RSS 订阅 · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · 2026-10-20

本系统综述纳入成人司美格鲁肽治疗研究,主要对司美格鲁肽单药组从基线到最长随访的握力组内变化进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果显示握力合并变化为-0.16 kgf(95%CI:-1.98至1.65),未达统计学显著,异质性高,证据确定性极低。现有证据不足以判断司美格鲁肽与握力变化的关系。

要点

  • 司美格鲁肽治疗后握力合并变化无统计学显著差异。
  • 证据确定性极低且异质性高,不能据此判断肌力保留或因果关系。
  • 临床解读握力变化需结合对照研究和标准化评估。

核心结论

  • 现有证据不足以确定司美格鲁肽是否与握力变化相关,主要合并分析未显示统计学显著变化。

研究设计与样本

  • 本研究为PRISMA 2020系统综述与荟萃分析,已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251185935)。
  • 检索MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、LILACS和Google Scholar,截止2026年8月20日,无语言限制。
  • 纳入报告骨骼肌力量指标的成人司美格鲁肽治疗研究,包括随机、非随机及无对照前后研究。

主要发现

  • 16篇报告代表11项研究,均评估握力,1项小型随机试验还评估了伸膝力量。
  • 异质性I²=90.8%,95%预测区间为-5.96至5.63 kgf;按疗程分层及敏感性分析均未显示统计学显著。

关键数值与推荐

  • 主要荟萃分析仅合并司美格鲁肽单药组从基线到最长随访的组内握力变化。
  • 伸膝力量仅作描述性总结,未进行定量合并。

临床怎么用

  • 临床中不应依据当前证据推断司美格鲁肽会保留或损害肌力。
  • 如需评估肌力变化,应优先采用有对照、标准化力量评估且随访更长的研究设计。

局限性

  • 主要合并基于无对照的组内变化,不能建立因果关系。
  • 证据确定性极低,研究间异质性显著。
  • 个体研究结果不一致,力量评估方法和随访时长缺乏标准化。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

ABSTRACT Aims To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize within-group changes in skeletal muscle strength following semaglutide treatment in adults. Materials and Methods This PRISMA 2020 systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251185935). MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS and Google Scholar were searched through 20 August 2026, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included adults treated with semaglutide reporting quantitative skeletal muscle strength outcomes, including handgrip and knee extension strength. Randomized, non-randomized and uncontrolled before-after studies were included. The primary meta-analysis pooled within-group changes in handgrip strength from baseline to the longest available follow-up of semaglutide-only arms using a random-effects model. Knee extension strength was summarized descriptively. Results Sixteen reports represented eleven studies, all assessing handgrip strength; one small randomized trial also assessed knee extension strength. Ten studies (660 semaglutide-treated participants) contributed to the primary meta-analysis of uncontrolled within-group changes, showing a nonsignificant pooled handgrip strength change (−0.16 kgf; 95% confidence interval: −1.98 to 1.65), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 90.8%) and a 95% prediction interval from −5.96 to 5.63 kgf. Duration-stratified and sensitivity analyses were also nonsignificant. Individual study findings were heterogeneous. Certainty was very low. Conclusions Available evidence is insufficient to determine whether semaglutide is associated with changes in handgrip strength because the principal synthesis was based on uncontrolled within-group changes, with very low certainty and significant heterogeneity. These findings do not establish strength preservation or a causal treatment effect. More robust comparative studies with standardized strength assessment and longer follow-up are needed.

来源:Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism:Changes in Muscle Strength Following Semaglutide Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis of Handgrip Strength

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。