文献速递甲状腺疾病

TSH刺激方法在摄碘转移性分化型甲状腺癌中与可比结局相关:单中心回顾性观察研究

TSH Stimulation Methods are Associated with Comparable Outcomes in Radioiodine-Avid Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Single Center Retrospective Observational Study.
PubMed 文献 · Thyroid · 2026-05-14

该单中心回顾性队列纳入2005至2015年起始RAIT的189例摄碘远处转移DTC患者,比较rhTSH与混合刺激(rhTSH/THW)亚组的结局。中位随访123个月,调整后TSH刺激方法与TTP和OS无独立关联,转移负荷和诊断年龄是最强独立预测因素。临床选择应基于合并症、物流和患者偏好而非假定疗效差异。

要点

  • 调整后rhTSH与混合刺激亚组的TTP和OS无显著差异。
  • 转移负荷(大转移)和DTC诊断年龄是TTP和OS最强独立预测因素。
  • rhTSH与THW选择应个体化,基于合并症、物流和患者偏好。

核心结论

  • 在摄碘转移性DTC中,rhTSH或rhTSH/THW混合准备与调整后可比结局相关。
  • 预后主要由转移负荷和诊断年龄驱动。

研究设计与样本

  • 单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2005至2015年起始RAIT的189例连续符合条件的摄碘远处转移DTC患者。
  • 患者分为仅rhTSH组(n=81)和混合刺激组(n=108),仅THW组(n=5)因数量少被排除。
  • 采用Kaplan-Meier法估计TTP和OS,log-rank检验比较未调整差异,多变量Cox模型评估独立关联,并进行倾向评分匹配。

主要发现

  • 中位随访123个月(范围3-182个月)。
  • 最佳放射学反应以稳定疾病为主(49%),完全缓解23%,部分缓解18%,进展10%,TSH刺激亚组间无显著差异。
  • 未调整分析中混合亚组TTP(141 vs. 42个月;p<0.05)和OS(116 vs. 68个月;p<0.01)更优。
  • 调整后TSH刺激方法与TTP和OS无独立关联;转移负荷(大转移)和DTC诊断年龄是最强独立预测因素。
  • 倾向评分匹配队列中刺激组间TTP或OS无显著差异。

临床怎么用

  • 在摄碘转移性DTC中,rhTSH与THW选择应基于合并症、物流和患者偏好个体化,而非假定肿瘤学疗效差异。

局限性

  • 单中心回顾性观察设计。
  • 仅THW组样本量小(n=5)被排除。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: To enhance sodium-iodide symporter expression and, thereby, radiopharmaceutical uptake/retention in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) metastases, radioiodine therapy (RAIT) can be stimulated by recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) or thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW). We investigated the association of thyrotropin (TSH) stimulation methodology with treatment outcomes in patients with radioiodine-avid distantly metastatic DTC. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study involving 189 consecutive eligible patients initiating RAIT from 2005 to 2015, a period allowing sufficient follow-up to adequately assess long-term outcomes. Patients were dichotomized into "rhTSH only" or "mixed stimulation" subgroups (respectively, all RAIT activities prepared by rhTSH or ≥1 activity prepared using THW; n = 81, n = 108). Patients given only THW (n = 5) were excluded due to low numbers for statistical analysis. Endpoints comprised radiological/biochemical response and time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Unadjusted inter-subgroup differences underwent log-rank testing; multivariable Cox modeling assessed independent associations with TTP and OS of disease/treatment characteristics, including stimulation methodology. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce baseline differences between the stimulation groups. RESULTS: Median (minimum-maximum) follow-up was 123 (3-182) months. The best radiologic response consisted predominantly of stable disease (49%), with complete and partial responses observed in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively, and progressive disease in 10%, without significant differences between the TSH stimulation subgroups. Unadjusted analyses favored the mixed subgroup regarding TTP (141 vs. 42 months; p < 0.05) and OS (116 vs. 68 months; p < 0.01). However, after adjustment, TSH stimulation method was not independently associated with these outcomes; metastatic burden (macrometastasis) and age at DTC diagnosis were the strongest independent predictors. Consistent results were observed in the propensity score-matched cohort, with no significant differences in TTP or OS between stimulation groups. CONCLUSIONS: In radioiodine-avid metastatic DTC, rhTSH or mixed rhTSH/THW preparation is associated with comparable adjusted outcomes. Prognosis appears to be chiefly driven by metastatic burden and age. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In patients with radioiodine-avid metastatic DTC, the choice between rhTSH and THW should be individualized based on comorbidities, logistics, and patient preference rather than an assumed difference in oncologic efficacy.

来源:Thyroid,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Ledwon A, Paliczka-Cieślik E, Kropińska A, et al. TSH Stimulation Methods are Associated with Comparable Outcomes in Radioiodine-Avid Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Single Center Retrospective Observational Study. Thyroid. 2026. PMID: 42132097. doi:10.1177/10507256261448724

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。