分化型甲状腺癌卓越缓解后随访降级至基层医疗的前瞻性评估
本研究对154例分化型甲状腺癌患者进行纵向队列研究,患者在完成≥5年专科随访并达到卓越缓解后转至基层医疗,并在转诊后≥5年进行标准化再评估。结果显示卓越缓解状态稳定,转诊后平均70.3个月随访期间无生化或结构复发,支持将卓越缓解患者安全降级至基层医疗随访。
要点
- 卓越缓解患者转至基层医疗后平均70.3个月无复发。
- 基层随访为低强度,仅7.1%患者检测甲状腺球蛋白。
- 42.9%患者仍高度恐惧复发,91.6%偏好专科随访。
核心结论
- 完成≥5年专科随访且达到卓越缓解的分化型甲状腺癌患者可安全转至基层医疗。
- 卓越缓解是稳定临床状态,即使大幅减少生化和影像监测,临床意义复发风险也极低。
研究设计与样本
- 纵向队列研究,纳入154例接受全甲状腺切除术(伴或不伴放射性碘消融)的分化型甲状腺癌患者。
- 患者完成≥5年专科随访并在达到卓越缓解后转至基层医疗,其中9例临床稳定但持续不确定缓解者基于临床判断也转诊。
- 转诊至基层医疗≥5年后进行标准化再评估,并在三个预设时间点评估动态风险分层。
主要发现
- 卓越缓解比例从初始治疗后6个月的118/154(76.6%)升至转诊前145/154(94.2%)和转诊后再评估时148/154(96.1%)(p < 0.001)。
- 转诊后平均随访70.3 ± 10.6个月期间,未观察到生化或结构复发。
- 再评估时所有非卓越缓解发现仅见于转诊时已分类为不确定缓解的患者,无卓越缓解患者出现恶化。
- 专科随访期间8/154(5.2%)需要额外干预。
- 基层监测为低强度:11/154(7.1%)进行甲状腺球蛋白检测,无常规颈部超声,左甲状腺素剂量稳定。
关键数值与推荐
- 基线美国甲状腺协会2025年复发风险:低危78/154(50.6%),中低危44/154(28.6%),中高危23/154(14.9%),高危9/154(5.8%)。
- 转诊前最后访视时9/154(5.8%)为不确定缓解,转诊后再评估时降至6/154(3.9%)。
- 过早再转诊至专科发生13/154(8.4%),无复发证据。
- 66/154(42.9%)报告高度恐惧复发,141/154(91.6%)偏好专科随访。
临床怎么用
- 对完成≥5年专科随访且达到卓越缓解的分化型甲状腺癌患者,可考虑转至基层医疗进行长期随访。
- 基层随访可聚焦于甲状腺激素替代和TSH监测,大幅减少甲状腺球蛋白检测和颈部超声。
- 需关注患者复发恐惧心理,尽管预后良好,多数患者仍偏好专科随访。
局限性
- 研究样本量有限,仅154例,其中9例为不确定缓解者基于临床判断转诊。
- 需要进一步研究确认这些发现。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
BACKGROUND: Dynamic risk stratification (DRS) enables response-adapted follow-up in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). However, prospective data supporting surveillance de-escalation and discharge to primary care (PC) after an excellent response (ER) is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study with a prospectively conducted postdischarge reassessment, including 154 patients with DTC treated with total thyroidectomy, with or without radioiodine ablation, who completed ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and were discharged to PC after achieving ER. A small subset (n = 9) of clinically stable patients was also discharged despite a persistent indeterminate response (IR), based on clinical judgment. Patients underwent a standardized reassessment ≥5 years after discharge to PC. DRS was assessed at three predefined time points 6 months after initial therapy, final predischarge specialist visit, and postdischarge reassessment. Outcomes included recurrence, additional interventions, real-world PC follow-up practices, referrals back to specialist care, and patient-reported outcomes collected at reassessment using a study-specific 5-point Likert-type questionnaire. RESULTS: Baseline American Thyroid Association-2025 recurrence risk was low 78/154 (50.6%), intermediate-low 44/154 (28.6%), intermediate-high 23/154 (14.9%), and high 9/154 (5.8%). ER increased from 118/154 (76.6%) at 6 months to 145/154 (94.2%) at predischarge and to 148/154 (96.1%) at postdischarge reassessment (p < 0.001). At last predischarge visit, 9/154 (5.8%) had an IR, decreasing to 6/154 (3.9%) at postdischarge reassessment. No biochemical or structural recurrences were observed over a mean postdischarge follow-up of 70.3 ± 10.6 months. All non-ER findings at reassessment occurred exclusively in patients already classified as IR at discharge, with no deterioration from ER. During specialist follow-up, 8/154 (5.2%) required additional interventions. PC surveillance was characterized by low-intensity follow-up, with thyroglobulin testing in 11/154 (7.1%), no routine neck ultrasound, and stable levothyroxine dosing. Premature re-referral to specialist care occurred in 13/154 (8.4%) without evidence of recurrence. Despite favorable outcomes, 66/154 (42.9%) reported high fear of recurrence and 141/154 (91.6%) preferred specialist follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients with DTC who complete ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and achieve ER may be safely transitioned to PC. ER represents a stable clinical state, with minimal risk of clinically meaningful recurrence even with markedly reduced biochemical and imaging surveillance. These findings support a response-adapted long-term care model centered in PC, focused on thyroid hormone replacement and TSH monitoring. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
引用
- Fernández Velasco P, Torres B, Estévez Asensio L, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Follow-Up De-Escalation to Primary Care in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Excellent Response to Therapy. Thyroid. 2026. PMID: 42184216. doi:10.1177/10507256261454209
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。