文献速递糖尿病肥胖与代谢综合征

替尔泊肽与度拉糖肽对2型糖尿病主要肾脏事件影响的比较:SURPASS-CVOT预设探索性分析

A comparison of the effects of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major kidney events in people with type 2 diabetes: pre-specified exploratory analyses of the SURPASS-CVOT trial.
PubMed 文献 · Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol · 2026-05-11

BACKGROUND: In the SURPASS-CVOT trial, tirzepatide, a dual incretin agonist that targets the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors, was shown to be non-inferior to dulaglutide for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome in people …

要点

  • 替尔泊肽较度拉糖肽降低主要肾脏复合事件风险23%,低中危与高危CKD人群均获益。
  • 低中危CKD获益主要来自减少新发持续性大量白蛋白尿,高危CKD获益主要来自减缓eGFR下降。
  • 替尔泊肽组恶心、呕吐和腹泻发生率高于度拉糖肽组。

核心结论

  • 在2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中,替尔泊肽相比度拉糖肽与主要肾脏事件风险降低相关。
  • 肾脏获益主要由低中危慢性肾脏病患者的持续性大量白蛋白尿新发减少和高危慢性肾脏病患者的肾功能下降减缓所驱动。

研究设计与样本

  • SURPASS-CVOT为随机、活性对照、双盲试验,在30个国家640个中心入组2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者。
  • 主要复合肾脏结局为持续性大量白蛋白尿、eGFR持续下降≥50%、终末期肾病或肾脏疾病死亡首次发生的时间。

主要发现

  • 替尔泊肽组恶心、呕吐和腹泻均较度拉糖肽组更常见。

临床怎么用

  • 对于2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病且伴慢性肾脏病的患者,替尔泊肽可考虑作为优先选择的GLP-1/GIP双受体激动剂以降低肾脏事件风险。
  • 低中危慢性肾脏病患者应监测UACR以评估替尔泊肽减少新发大量白蛋白尿的获益。
  • 高危慢性肾脏病患者应监测eGFR以评估替尔泊肽减缓肾功能下降的获益,同时注意胃肠道不良反应。

局限性

  • 该分析为预设探索性分析,非主要终点,结论需谨慎解读。
  • 研究仅纳入2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者,结果不能外推至其他人群。
  • 慢性肾脏病风险分层基于基线eGFR和UACR,随访期间未动态重新分层。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: In the SURPASS-CVOT trial, tirzepatide, a dual incretin agonist that targets the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors, was shown to be non-inferior to dulaglutide for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome in people with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Here, we report the results of a pre-specified exploratory analysis of SURPASS-CVOT that aimed to assess major kidney events in the overall population, low-to-moderate-risk chronic kidney disease population, and high-risk chronic kidney disease population. METHODS: SURPASS-CVOT was a randomised, active comparator-controlled, double-blind trial that enrolled people with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at 640 sites in 30 countries. Participants aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, HbA1c between 7% and 10·5%, and a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or greater were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-weekly blinded subcutaneous injection of either tirzepatide up to 15 mg or dulaglutide 1·5 mg. Annual visits included assessment of serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). High-risk chronic kidney disease was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or greater and UACR greater than 300 mg/g; eGFR 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2 to less than 60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 and UACR greater than 30 mg/g; or eGFR less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, with eGFR calculated with the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration serum creatinine-cystatin C equation. The primary composite kidney outcome was time to first occurrence of persistent macroalbuminuria, persistent reduction in eGFR of 50% or greater, end-stage kidney disease (eGFR <15 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or initiation of chronic kidney replacement therapy), or death from kidney disease. FINDINGS: Between May 29, 2020, and June 27, 2022, 16 979 participants were screened and 13 299 (2948 with high-risk chronic kidney disease) were randomly assigned. After excluding 134 participants randomly assigned in error, 6586 were assigned to tirzepatide and 6579 were assigned to dulaglutide. At baseline, 4142 (32·0%) of 12 954 participants had microalbuminuria and 1491 (11·5%) of 12 954 had macroalbuminuria, and 2928 (22·5%) of 13 004 had an eGFR less than 60 mL/min per 1·73 m2. After a median follow-up of 4·0 (IQR 3·7-4·4) years, the risk of the primary composite kidney outcome in the overall population was 23% lower with tirzepatide than with dulaglutide (396 [6·0%] vs 498 [7·6%] events, hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·68 to 0·88], p=0·0002) and was similarly reduced in those with low-to-moderate-risk chronic kidney disease (195 [4·0%] vs 283 [5·6%], 0·70 [0·58 to 0·84], p=0·0001) and those with high-risk chronic kidney disease (185 [12·2%] vs 203 [14·5%], 0·79 [95% CI 0·64 to 0·96], p=0·018). This was primarily driven by a lower rate of new-onset persistent macroalbuminuria in those with low-to-moderate-risk chronic kidney disease and a lower rate of eGFR decline in those with high-risk chronic kidney disease. Observations were consistent in all other subgroups examined. The annual rate of decline in eGFR was lower with tirzepatide than with dulaglutide in the overall population (between-group difference 0·29 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [95% CI 0·17 to 0·41]; p<0·0001) and in those with high-risk chronic kidney disease (0·93 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·65 to 1·22], p<0·0001). Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea were all more common in those receiving tirzepatide than in those receiving dulaglutide. INTERPRETATION: Among people with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, tirzepatide was associated with a reduced risk of major kidney events compared with dulaglutide, primarily driven by a reduction in new-onset macroalbuminuria in people with low-to-moderate-risk chronic kidney disease, and slowed decline in kidney function in people with high-risk chronic kidney disease. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

来源:Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Zoungas S, D'Alessio D, Pavo I, et al. A comparison of the effects of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major kidney events in people with type 2 diabetes: pre-specified exploratory analyses of the SURPASS-CVOT trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2026. PMID: 42114520. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00032-X

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。