文献速递甲状腺疾病

仑伐替尼与索拉非尼治疗甲状腺癌的真实世界疗效与安全性:倾向评分匹配回顾性研究

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score-Matched Study.
PubMed 文献 · Thyroid · 2026-04-13

本研究利用TriNetX真实世界数据,回顾性比较仑伐替尼与索拉非尼治疗放射性碘难治性甲状腺癌的疗效与安全性。倾向评分匹配后每组214例,仑伐替尼组1年OS为78.5% vs 64.5%(HR 0.538),3年OS为62.1% vs 45.8%(HR 0.590),全因住院和急诊率相当。结论支持仑伐替尼作为首选一线mTKI。

要点

  • 仑伐替尼较索拉非尼显著改善1年和3年总生存。
  • 两组全因住院和急诊使用率相当,安全性总体可比。
  • 高肿瘤负荷患者中仑伐替尼生存获益更明显。

核心结论

  • 在甲状腺癌患者中,仑伐替尼较索拉非尼与改善的总生存相关,安全性总体可比。

研究设计与样本

  • 回顾性队列研究,利用TriNetX国际电子病历网络数据,纳入启动仑伐替尼或索拉非尼的成人甲状腺癌患者,经倾向评分匹配后每组214例。

主要发现

  • 全因住院和急诊就诊率两组相当。
  • 血液学不良事件索拉非尼更常见,肾脏和心血管事件仑伐替尼有更高趋势。
  • 亚组分析中仑伐替尼生存获益一致,高肿瘤负荷患者尤为明显。

临床怎么用

  • 真实世界数据支持仑伐替尼作为放射性碘难治性甲状腺癌的首选一线mTKI,与当前治疗范式一致。

局限性

  • 回顾性真实世界研究设计,可能存在未测量混杂。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib and sorafenib are multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (TC). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we leveraged real-world TriNetX data to compare their effectiveness and tolerability in progressive TC. TriNetX is a federated international electronic medical record research network that aggregates anonymized data from multiple health care organizations. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with TC initiating lenvatinib or sorafenib. Patients with other malignancies treated with these agents or exposure to the alternative mTKI were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic characteristics, tumor burden, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, emergency care utilization, and selected treatment-emergent adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed across demographic, disease-related, and comorbidity strata. RESULTS: With matched cohorts of 214 patients in each arm, lenvatinib was associated with significantly improved OS compared with sorafenib at both 1 year (78.5% vs. 64.5%; hazard ratio [HR] with confidence interval [CI] 0.538 [0.373-0.775]) and 3 years ([62.1% vs. 45.8%; HR with CI 0.590 [0.444-0.784]). All-cause hospitalization and emergency care admission rates were comparable. Hematological adverse events occurred more frequently with sorafenib, while renal and cardiovascular events trended higher with lenvatinib. Survival benefits with lenvatinib were consistent across subgroups and appeared especially pronounced in patients with high tumor burden. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib was associated with improved OS compared with sorafenib in patients with TC, with broadly comparable safety profiles. These findings, based on retrospective real-world data, support the use of lenvatinib as a preferred first-line mTKI in line with current treatment paradigms.

来源:Thyroid,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Kappenstein M, Koehler VF, Ninosu N, et al. Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score-Matched Study. Thyroid. 2026. PMID: 41973661. doi:10.1177/10507256261442836

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。