多族裔人群中2型糖尿病发病率不平等:族裔、移民与心理健康合并症影响的队列研究
本研究利用南伦敦初级保健中心约34万无基线2型糖尿病的成人数据(2012-2019年),采用Cox比例风险模型序贯调整年龄性别、移民状态及心理健康与躯体合并症,发现南亚、黑非和黑加勒比裔相比白人英裔2型糖尿病风险高2-3倍,仅部分由社会经济和临床因素解释;境外出生使风险增加29%,抑郁/焦虑和严重精神疾病与更高风险相关,未发现强交互作用。
要点
- 南亚、黑非和黑加勒比裔2型糖尿病风险比白人英裔高2-3倍,调整后差异持续存在。
- 境外出生使所有族裔的2型糖尿病风险增加29%。
- 抑郁/焦虑和严重精神疾病与2型糖尿病风险升高相关,且与族裔无强交互作用。
核心结论
- 族裔、移民状态和心理健康状况各自独立地与2型糖尿病风险相关。
- 调整社会经济和临床因素后,族裔间2型糖尿病风险差异仍然存在。
- 未发现移民状态或心理健康与族裔间存在强交互作用的统计证据。
研究设计与样本
- 纵向队列研究(2012-2019年),纳入南伦敦初级保健中心约340,000名基线无2型糖尿病的成人。
- 采用Cox比例风险模型,序贯调整年龄和性别、移民状态(出生国是否为英国)、心理健康状况(抑郁、焦虑、严重精神疾病)、躯体健康因素(BMI、高血压及其他大血管疾病)和区域剥夺程度。
主要发现
- 南亚、黑非和黑加勒比裔相比白人英裔的2型糖尿病风险高2-3倍,仅部分由社会经济和临床因素解释。
- 境外出生使所有族裔的2型糖尿病风险增加29%。
- 抑郁/焦虑和严重精神疾病与更高的2型糖尿病风险相关。
- 未获得这些因素之间存在强交互作用的统计证据。
关键数值与推荐
- 南亚、黑非和黑加勒比裔相比白人英裔的2型糖尿病风险高2-3倍。
- 境外出生使2型糖尿病风险增加29%。
- 抑郁/焦虑和严重精神疾病与2型糖尿病风险升高相关。
临床怎么用
- 对南亚、黑非和黑加勒比裔等高风险族裔应加强2型糖尿病筛查与预防。
- 关注移民人群的糖尿病风险,提供移民后支持。
- 对抑郁、焦虑和严重精神疾病患者应监测2型糖尿病风险。
- 减少糖尿病不平等需同时应对移民后挑战及更广泛的结构性和环境决定因素。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Ethnic disparities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus are well documented in multiethnic urban populations, but the contributions of migration status and mental health are less well understood. This study used a large dataset from primary care centres in South London that is unique in that it includes migration-related information together with information on mental and physical health comorbidities. We aimed to assess how migration status and mental health contribute to longitudinal associations of ethnicity and type 2 diabetes risk in a multiethnic urban population. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study (2012-2019) of approximately 340,000 adults without baseline type 2 diabetes. Cox proportional hazards models were applied with sequential adjustments: first for age and sex; second, adding migration status (country of birth being UK or not); and third, further adding mental health conditions (depression, anxiety, severe mental illness), physical health factors (BMI, hypertension and other macrovascular diseases) and area-level deprivation. This approach allowed us to examine whether ethnic differences in the incidence of type 2 diabetes persist after accounting for additional factors. RESULTS: South Asian, Black African and Black Caribbean groups had 2-3-fold higher type 2 diabetes risks compared with White British individuals, which were only partially explained by socioeconomic and clinical factors. Being born outside the UK increased type 2 diabetes risk by 29% across all ethnic groups. Depression/anxiety and severe mental illness were associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. No statistical evidence of strong interactions between these factors was obtained. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ethnicity, migration status and mental health conditions were each independently associated with type 2 diabetes risk, and ethnic disparities persisted after adjustment. The lack of evidence for interactions suggests that migration- and mental health-related mechanisms may operate similarly across ethnic groups rather than amplifying or mitigating existing disparities in type 2 diabetes rates. Efforts to reduce diabetes inequalities will require both support for post‑migration challenges and addressing of the broader structural and environmental determinants underlying persistent ethnic disparities.
引用
- Shamsutdinova D, Stahl D, Das-Munshi J, et al. Inequalities in type 2 diabetes incidence in a multiethnic population: a cohort study investigating the impact of ethnicity, migration and mental health comorbidities. Diabetologia. 2026. PMID: 42018145. doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06740-3
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。