SGLT2抑制剂使用与2型糖尿病全因死亡率的种族差异:新西兰多族裔人群研究
本研究基于新西兰奥克兰/怀卡托地区59,505例18-75岁2型糖尿病患者的初级保健数据,链接2021-2024年全国药物配发与死亡记录。经倾向性匹配后比较使用与未使用恩格列净者的死亡率,发现SGLT2i使用与死亡率降低相关,且毛利人和太平洋族裔的获益幅度大于欧洲裔。
要点
- SGLT2i使用与全因死亡率降低相关,毛利人HR 0.475、太平洋族裔HR 0.507、欧洲裔HR 0.667。
- 有心血管/肾脏疾病或风险者年化粗死亡率:未用药35.2 vs 用药13.1/1000人年。
- 无心血管/肾脏疾病或风险者年化粗死亡率:未用药7.7 vs 用药3.6/1000人年。
核心结论
- SGLT2i使用对死亡率的保护作用因族裔而异,在新西兰毛利人和太平洋族裔2型糖尿病患者中获益更大。
- 在原住民和少数族裔人群中推广SGLT2i可能有助于改善健康公平。
研究设计与样本
- 基于新西兰奥克兰/怀卡托地区初级保健记录的人群研究,纳入18-75岁2型糖尿病患者59,505例,时间范围为2021年2月至2023年12月。
- 数据通过国家健康标识号链接至2021-2024年全国药物配发和死亡记录。
- 采用倾向性匹配和Cox模型,按族裔、年龄、性别、用药、基线HbA1c及心血管和/或肾脏疾病/风险状态(是/否)进行调整。
- 研究遵循CONSIDER声明报告,由新西兰健康研究委员会资助。
主要发现
- 匹配后形成两组各12,792人。
- 有心血管和/或肾脏疾病/风险者年化粗死亡率:未配发SGLT2i组35.2/1000人年 vs 配发组13.1/1000人年。
- 无心血管和/或肾脏疾病/风险者年化粗死亡率:未配发SGLT2i组7.7/1000人年 vs 配发组3.6/1000人年。
- 校正后SGLT2i使用与死亡率的关联:毛利人HR 0.475(95%CI 0.336, 0.672;p<0.001)。
- 校正后SGLT2i使用与死亡率的关联:太平洋族裔HR 0.507(95%CI 0.395, 0.651;p<0.001);欧洲裔HR 0.667(95%CI 0.545, 0.816;p<0.001)。
临床怎么用
- 在2型糖尿病合并心血管和/或肾脏疾病/风险的患者中,SGLT2i使用与较低的全因死亡率相关。
- 对原住民和少数族裔2型糖尿病患者,SGLT2i使用可能带来更大幅度的死亡率下降,支持在该人群中积极考虑SGLT2i治疗以促进健康公平。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are known to reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes, but there are limited data regarding mortality outcomes in different ethnic groups (including Indigenous peoples). This study reports on mortality outcomes in a population in Aotearoa New Zealand (hereafter New Zealand) with type 2 diabetes, following the funded availability of the SGLT2i empagliflozin with prioritised access for Māori and Pacific people. METHODS: Data were collected from primary care records for those aged 18-75 years with type 2 diabetes (Auckland/Waikato regions of New Zealand; February 2021 to December 2023; n=59,505). These data were linked to national medication-dispensing and mortality records for 2021-2024 via national health identifier numbers. Following propensity matching and Cox modelling for ethnicity, age, gender, medication use, baseline HbA1c and cardiovascular and/or renal disease/risk (CVRD) status (yes/no), mortality rates were compared by ethnicity in those with and without CVRD and who did/did not initiate empagliflozin. This study was reported in accordance with the CONSIDER statement, used to strengthen the reporting of research involving Indigenous peoples. The study was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand. RESULTS: Following matching, two groups of 12,792 individuals were identified. Annualised crude mortality (deaths per 1000 individuals per year) was higher in those not dispensed with SGLT2i than in those receiving SGLT2i (35.2 vs 13.1 in those with CVRD and 7.7 vs 3.6 in those without CVRD, respectively). After adjustment, the greatest difference in mortality with SGLT2i use was seen in Māori (HR 0.475; 95% CI 0.336, 0.672; p<0.001), followed by Pacific people (HR 0.507; 95% CI 0.395, 0.651; p<0.001) and European people (HR 0.667; 95% CI 0.545, 0.816; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The protective effect of SGLT2i use on mortality appears to differ by ethnicity and is greater in Indigenous Māori and Pacific populations in New Zealand with type 2 diabetes. SGLT2i use in Indigenous and minority populations may support improved health equity.
引用
- Chepulis L, Gan H, Simmons D, et al. SGLT2 inhibitor use and disparities in all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: insights from a multi-ethnic population. Diabetologia. 2026. PMID: 42036458. doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06733-2
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。