公众号 / 文章创伤与烧伤

髋关节与骨盆影像参考线与测量弧线

Hip and pelvic lines and arcs
RSS 订阅 · LITFL
一句话结论骨盆X线片中的参考线、测量角度和弧线用于评估髋关节对位、髋臼发育、股骨头覆盖和近端股骨病变,需结合骨骼成熟度与具体病理联合判读,不能单一依赖某条线。

骨盆X线片包含多种参考线、弧线和角度测量,用于评估髋关节对位、髋臼发育与股骨近端病变。儿童发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)评估依赖Hilgenreiner线、Perkins线、Tönnis角和Reimers移位百分比等构建框架。青少年股骨头骺滑脱(SCFE)的诊断需联合Klein线、Capener三角、Steel征和S征等多种征象。成熟髋关节评估采用Wiberg中心边缘角和Sharp角量化髋臼覆盖与倾斜度。这些参考线的临床意义随骨骼成熟度和病理类型而变化,需综合解读,单一征象可能遗漏细微病变。

要点

  • 青少年SCFE在AP片上,Klein线可能与股骨头骺交集减少或完全不相交(正常应横切外侧骺部分),Steel征表现为骨干端旁新月形致密影,Capener三角缩小或消失;单一AP征可能漏诊细微滑脱。
  • SCFE的蛙式侧位片S征:正常时自小转子至股骨头中点形成平滑曲线,异常表现为轮廓中断、不对称或锐角转折;观察者研究显示S征优于Klein线且观察者间一致性更好,但轻度滑脱敏感性仍较低。
  • DDH评估基础框架:Hilgenreiner线(通过Y形软骨水平线)与Perkins线(过髋臼外缘垂直线)将髋关节分为象限定位股骨近端;Tönnis角(髋臼顶线与Hilgenreiner线夹角)测量髋臼倾斜度,角度越大表示髋臼越陡峭、发育不良。
  • Reimers移位百分比量化股骨头外移:股骨头在Perkins线外侧部分(a)除以股骨头总宽度(b)乘以100,是髋关节监测(特别是脑瘫儿童)的可重复定量指标。
  • Shenton线(颈-闭孔弧)可辅助评估DDH尤其在步行年龄儿童,并适用于青少年和成人髋关节病变,但新生儿因生理性髋位变化敏感性较低。

适用人群与场景

  • 发育性髋关节(儿童/新生儿)评估:Hilgenreiner线、Perkins线、Tönnis角、Reimers移位百分比、Andrén-von Rosen投照
  • 青少年股骨头骺滑脱(SCFE)诊断:Klein线、Capener三角、Steel征(AP片)、S征(蛙式侧位片)
  • 成熟髋关节(骨骼成熟后)评估髋臼覆盖与倾斜:Wiberg中心边缘角、Sharp角、Köhler线与泪滴
  • Shenton线跨年龄段适用,但新生儿敏感性低,步行年龄儿童及青少年成人更可靠

诊断标准与关键阈值

  • Tönnis角:髋臼顶线与Hilgenreiner线之间夹角,角度越大表示髋臼越陡峭、越不发育,支持髋臼发育不良诊断
  • Reimers移位百分比:股骨头在Perkins线外侧部分/股骨头总横向宽度×100,量化髋关节外移程度
  • Klein线:延长股骨颈上缘皮质至近端,正常横切股骨头骺外侧部分;SCFE早期交集减少,重度滑脱完全不相交
  • Capener三角:AP片上股骨颈/干骺端内下与髋臼后壁重叠形成致密三角,SCFE时三角缩小或消失
  • S征(蛙式侧位):自小转子沿股骨颈后下皮质、跨骺板至股骨头中点形成平滑曲线,SCFE时轮廓中断、不对称或锐角转折
  • Wiberg中心边缘角:股骨头中心处垂直参考线与至髋臼外缘顶线夹角,测量外侧覆盖,数值越小覆盖越少
  • Sharp角:通过泪滴下缘水平线与泪滴至髋臼外缘顶线夹角,测量髋臼总体倾斜度,数值越大髋臼越陡峭
  • Andrén-von Rosen投照:股骨外展至少45°并内旋,正常时股骨干轴线指向髋臼边缘,脱位时指向髂前上棘

处置流程与药物剂量

  • 原文未提及

红旗征与不能漏的情况

  • 青少年SCFE单一AP征象可能漏诊细微滑脱,需联合Klein线、Capener三角、Steel征,可疑时需加做侧位片
  • Steel征(骨干端旁新月形致密影)可能在Klein线明显异常前即已出现,提示骺向后方移位,需侧位片确认
  • 新生儿Shenton线敏感性较低,生理性髋位变化可影响弧线可靠性,需结合其他DDH评估线
  • 单条参考线不可孤立解读,需结合骨骼成熟度与具体病理类型综合判断

研究设计与关键结果

  • 原文为影像学教学综述,汇总髋关节与骨盆X线参考线、弧线和测量角度的解剖构建、历史演变与临床应用
  • S征观察者研究(Rebich 2018)显示S征在SCFE诊断中表现优于Klein线,观察者间一致性更好,但轻度滑脱敏感性仍较低
  • Hilgenreiner线(1925)、Perkins线(1928,早期Ombrédanne 1923已有类似描述)、Tönnis角(1968)构成DDH评估基础框架
  • Klein线(1952)用于SCFE评估,Trethowan征最早归因于Crabbe 1968,描述股骨颈上缘与骺外缘角度异常
  • Capener三角由Capener 1956描述解剖基础、Durbin 1960描述机制、Jacobs 1962图示、Scham 1968正式命名
  • Wiberg中心边缘角(1939)测量外侧髋臼覆盖,Sharp角(1961)测量髋臼倾斜度,Tönnis后追溯至Ullmann 1938
  • Köhler线与泪滴(1905)由Köhler首次描述,泪滴为多层髋臼与骨盆皮质叠影形成U形影,外观随投照角度变化

证据类型、等级与局限

  • 综述类型:影像学教学文章,汇总历史文献与解剖构建方法,引用原始描述发表年份与作者
  • S征证据来自单项观察者研究(Rebich 2018),显示优于Klein线但轻度滑脱敏感性仍有限
  • 其他参考线为历史上多位临床医师描述的解剖投影构建,部分命名存在后追溯或多重命名现象
  • 原文强调不同传统对同一影像现象可能使用不同命名(如Ombrédanne-Perkins线),原始描述与后期归因存在时间差异

对床旁实践的改变

  • 急诊遇疑似青少年SCFE时,AP片需联合Klein线、Capener三角、Steel征评估,单一征象阴性不排除诊断,应加做蛙式侧位片评估S征
  • 脑瘫儿童髋关节监测中,Reimers移位百分比提供可重复定量指标,便于追踪随访外移进展
  • 新生儿DDH评估时,Shenton线敏感性低,需依赖Hilgenreiner-Perkins象限系统与Tönnis角综合判断,必要时加做Andrén-von Rosen投照
  • 成熟髋关节评估髋臼覆盖与倾斜时,Wiberg中心边缘角与Sharp角提供定量测量,较主观描述更客观
  • 原文不提供治疗方案或急诊处置流程,仅为影像学诊断参考线解读,不改变急诊处置决策本身

指南或共识出处

  • 影像学教学综述,引用文献包括:Hilgenreiner 1925、Perkins 1928、Ombrédanne 1923、Tönnis 1968、Reimers 1980、Andrén & von Rosen 1958、Shenton 1902、Klein 1952、Crabbe 1968、Capener 1956、Scham 1974、Steel 1986、Rebich 2018、Wiberg 1939、Sharp 1961、Köh
全文中译33 节 · 点击展开
本译文由 AI 依据开放获取原文逐段翻译,供学习参考,可能存在误差,请以原文为准。原文 © Eimear Kyle and Mike Cadogan(LITFL · Life in the Fast Lane),按 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可使用,本译文为翻译改编,并按相同许可提供。出处:Eimear Kyle and Mike Cadogan,「Hip and pelvic lines and arcs」,LITFL · Life in the Fast Lane

骨盆X线片包含一系列参考线、弧线、角度和投影轮廓构成的网络。它们可用于评估髋关节对线、髋臼发育、股骨头覆盖以及股骨近端病理。有些是简单的解剖结构,而另一些则保留了描述、改良或推广它们的临床医生的名字。

不应孤立地解读任何单一参考线。它们的相关性随骨骼成熟度和所研究的病理而变化。

青春期股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)

成熟髋关节的髋臼覆盖和骨盆对线。

Reimers移位百分比,Andrén-von Rosen位

青少年/SCFE Klein线,Trethowan征,Capener三角,Shenton线

发育中/儿科髋关节

发育中髋关节的评估依赖于由骨盆标志构建的参考线。Hilgenreiner线和Perkins线为股骨头定位提供基本框架。髋臼倾斜角评估髋臼发育。Reimers量化外侧移位,von Rosen提供额外的投影对线测试。

Hilgenreiner线

在儿科骨盆前后位片上通过Y形软骨绘制的水平参考线。它为发育性髋关节发育不良的评估提供基线,并支撑后续的构建。

Heinrich Hilgenreiner(1870-1953),德国-波希米亚外科医生

Hilgenreiner H. Zur Frühdiagnose und Frühbehandlung der angeborenen Hüftgelenkverrenkung. Medizinische Klinik 1925; 21: 1385-1388, 1425-1429

Perkins线

通过髋臼外侧缘绘制的垂直参考线,常规上垂直于Hilgenreiner线。这两条线一起将发育中的髋关节分为四个象限,并有助于在DDH中定位股骨近端。

尽管现在以George Perkins的名字命名,但与髋臼外侧顶部相切的等效垂直线已由Louis Ombrédanne在1923年描述,比Perkins 1928年的发表早五年。后来的文献也将Ombrédanne线、Putti线和Martin V线用于密切相关的髋臼垂直参考线。

George Perkins(1892-1979),英国骨科外科医生

Perkins G. Signs by which to diagnose congenital dislocation of the hip. Lancet 1928: 648-650

Tönnis角

在Hilgenreiner线和髋臼顶之间测量的髋臼顶角。较大的角度表示髋臼更陡峭、发育较差,支持髋臼发育不良的诊断。Tönnis在早期评估髋臼倾斜的方法基础上,标准化并推广了这一测量。

Dietrich Tönnis(1927-2010)

Tönnis D, Brunken D. Eine Abgrenzung normaler und pathologischer Hüftpfannendachwinkel zur Diagnose der Hüftdysplasie. Auswertungen von 2294 Pfannendachwinkeln kindlicher Hüftgelenke. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1968;64(3):197-228.

Reimers移位百分比

在前后位骨盆片上,可见股骨头位于Perkins线外侧部分的定量测量。将髋关节移位转换为可重复的百分比。在髋关节监测中很重要,特别是在脑瘫儿童中。

Jørgen Reimers(1931-2008),丹麦小儿骨科外科医生

Reimers J. The stability of the hip in children. A radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1980;184:1-100.

发育中的髋关节:关键骨盆线和测量。Hilgenreiner线(H)(红色)沿三联软骨水平绘制。Perkins线(P)(蓝色)通过髋臼外侧缘垂直于Hilgenreiner线绘制。Tönnis角(T)(黄色)测量Hilgenreiner线与髋臼顶之间的髋臼倾斜角。Reimers移位百分比(MP)(紫色)以a/b × 100量化股骨头相对于Perkins线的外侧移位,其中a是位于Perkins线外侧的骨化股骨头部分,b是股骨头的总横向宽度。

Andrén–von Rosen位/von Rosen线

一种特殊的新生儿/儿科髋关节前后位投照,股骨外展至少45°并内旋。复位髋关节中延长的股骨干轴线指向髋臼缘,脱位时指向髂前上棘。

Erik Sophus von Rosen (1898-1996),瑞典骨科外科医生

Andrén L, Von Rosen S. The diagnosis of dislocation of the hip in newborns and the primary results of immediate treatment. Acta Radiol (Stockh). 1958 Feb;49(2):89-95.

Andrén–von Rosen位:正常和脱位髋关节。特殊前后位投照,股骨外展至少45°并内旋。正常/复位髋关节(右侧髋关节)中,延长的股骨干轴线指向髋臼缘。脱位髋关节(左侧)中,延长的股骨干轴线指向髂前上棘(ASIS)。该位置为髋关节发育性移位提供了额外的投照检查。

Shenton线:跨年龄对线征象

一条评估骨盆与股骨近端关系的平滑颈-闭孔弧线。中断提示移位但无特异性。它可以支持发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)的评估,特别是在学步期儿童中,并且在青少年和成人髋关节病变中仍然有用。其在新生儿中的敏感性较低,因为生理性髋关节位置使该弧线可靠性降低。

Edward Warren Hine Shenton (1872–1955),英国放射科医生

Shenton EWH. A diagnostic line about the hip joint. Journal of Physical Therapeutics 1902;3:110-12.

青少年髋关节和股骨头骨骺滑脱

股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)的影像学征象反映了股骨头骨骺相对于股骨颈移位的不同后果。

在前后位上,Klein线评估股骨颈上方-骨骺关系,Capener三角反映髋臼-干骺端重叠,干骺端变白征反映移位骨骺与干骺端重叠。S征评估蛙式侧位投照上的轮廓连续性。

这些表现是互补的,轻微滑脱可能无法从单一前后位征象中显现。

Klein线——骨骺相对于股骨颈上方的位置在哪里?

Capener征——正常干骺端-髋臼重叠是否消失?

Steel征——后方移位是否造成了干骺端重叠?

S征——侧位头颈轮廓是否失去了正常连续性?

Klein线/Trethowan征

Klein线是在前后位片上延长股骨颈上方直线皮质缘而形成的。在正常发育中的髋关节,它横切股骨头外侧骨骺的一部分。早期SCFE时它可能较预期横切骨骺更少,而移位更大时可能完全不能横切骨骺。

Trethowan征现在常用于描述Klein线所显示的股骨颈-骨骺异常上移关系。尚未找到William Henry Trethowan的原始描述。已确认的最早归属是W. A. Crabbe在1968年提出的,他描述了股骨颈上缘与骨骺外侧边缘之间正常角度的丢失。

William Henry Trethowan (1882–1934),英国骨科外科医生

Klein A, Joplin RJ, Reidy JA, Hanelin J. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis; early diagnosis and treatment facilitated by normal roentgenograms. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952 Jan;34-A(1):233-9

Crabbe WA. Trethowan's sign In: Orthopaedics for the Undergraduate 1968

Capener三角

Capener三角(Capener征;三角征;Scham征)是在前后位X线片上股骨颈/干骺端内下方与髋臼后壁正常致密三角形重叠。在股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)时,移位减少了这种髋臼-干骺端重叠,因此三角形变小或消失。这是一个辅助征象而非独立的诊断发现。

Capener并未描述三角形。他在1956年描述了该征象的发育解剖学基础。Durbin (1960)描述了其机制,而Jacobs (1962)对三角形重叠进行了图解和临床评估。Scham在1968年描述了"致密三角",并在1974年正式提出"三角征"。

Norman Leslie Capener (1898-1975),英国骨科外科医生

Capener NL. Reconstructive Surgery of the Hip Joint. In: Platt H, ed. Modern Trends in Orthopaedics, 2nd series. 1956: 4-5

Scham SM. The triangular sign in the early diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;(103):16-7

干骺端苍白征 / Steel征

干骺端苍白征(Steel征)是在前后位X线片上邻近骨骺板的股骨近端干骺端上方呈新月形的密度增高区。这是由股骨头骨骺向后移位至股骨颈干骺端后方产生的投影重叠。该征象可能在明显的内侧移位使Klein线异常之前就已出现。当该发现引起对SCFE的怀疑时,需要拍摄侧位X线片。

Howard Haldeman Steel (1921–2018),美国骨科外科医生

Steel HH. The metaphyseal blanch sign of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(6):920–922

左侧SCFE的前后位骨盆片。拖动标记以显示标签。受累髋关节的异常Klein线 / Trethowan征(红色),干骺端苍白 / Steel征(白色箭头)和被破坏的Shenton线(绿色)。对侧髋关节显示正常的Capener三角(蓝色),说明滑脱侧相应的丢失。

S征

S征是在蛙式侧位X线片上描述的曲线征。该线沿着股骨近端的后下方皮质从股骨小转子开始,沿股骨颈延续并跨过骨骺板,然后弯曲指向股骨头中点。在正常髋关节中该轮廓是光滑的;连续性中断、不对称或急剧转折是异常的,可能提示SCFE。

在原始观察者研究中,S征表现优于Klein线并显示出更好的观察者间一致性,尽管在轻度滑脱中敏感性仍较低。

Rebich EJ, Lee SS, Schlechter JA. The S Sign: A New Radiographic Tool to Aid in the Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(6):835–843.

蛙式侧位片上的S征。正常的S征形成一条平滑的曲线轮廓,从小转子沿股骨颈后下方,穿过骨骺并环绕股骨头。在股骨头骨骺滑脱症(SCFE)中,该轮廓变得不连续、不对称或呈锐角。改编自Rebich, Lee and Schlechter (2018)

髋臼形态/成熟髋关节

在骨骼成熟的髋关节中,骨盆参考线有助于评估髋臼覆盖、方向、骨盆柱完整性和髋关节适配性。定量测量包括Wiberg中心边缘角和Sharp角。投影解剖轮廓包括髂坐线和髂耻线、髋臼壁和泪滴。

大多数成熟髋关节标志是解剖性的而非人名命名的。髂耻线勾勒出骨盆前柱/骨盆缘,而髋臼前壁和后壁轮廓有助于评估髋臼方向和覆盖。它们与髂坐线、泪滴和Shenton弧一起构成骨盆前后位X线影像的一部分。

Wiberg中心边缘角

Wiberg中心边缘角测量髋臼对股骨头的外侧覆盖。该角度在股骨头中心形成,位于垂直参考线和指向髋臼外侧顶部的连线之间。较小的数值表示覆盖减少。Wiberg于1939年引入该测量方法,尽管参考轴和髋臼外侧端点此后都有所演变。

Gunnar Wiberg(1902–1988),瑞典骨科外科医生

Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip. Acta chirurgica Scandinavica 1939;83(58):5-135.

Sharp角/Ullmann–Sharp角

Sharp角测量髋臼的整体倾斜度,独立于股骨头位置。它形成于通过骨盆泪滴下缘的水平线与从泪滴到髋臼外侧顶部的连线之间。数值增大表示髋臼更陡峭。Sharp于1961年描述并评估了该测量方法,尽管Tönnis后来将等效的构建归因于Karl Ullmann在1938年的工作。

Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B(2):268–272.

Köhler线

Köhler线(髂坐线)是从髂骨延伸至坐骨内侧的投影骨盆内侧轮廓。它为髋臼内侧深度提供参考。髋臼壁越过该线内侧表明髋臼深,而股骨头本身向内侧投影则定义为影像学髋臼前突。

Alban Köhler(1874–1947),德国放射学家

Köhler A. Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillem; 1905

Köhler泪滴

Köhler泪滴(骨盆泪滴;U形影)是骨盆前后位片上髋臼内侧的U形或泪滴形重叠阴影。它由几个髋臼和骨盆皮质表面的切线投影产生。泪滴用作评估髋臼形态、深度、内侧移位和对称性的标志。Köhler最初将其称为Tränenfigur("泪影"),并证明其外观随投影方式而变化。

Alban Köhler(1874–1947),德国放射学家

Köhler A. Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillem; 1905

成熟髋关节:关键的以人名命名的骨盆线、角度和标志点。拖动标记以显示标签。Köhler线(KL)沿髂坐骨轮廓走行,为髋臼内侧深度和内陷提供参考。Sharp角(SA)由泪滴间水平参考线与从泪滴下缘至髋臼外侧顶部的连线之间形成,测量髋臼倾斜度。Köhler泪滴(TD)是髋臼内侧特征性的U形重叠影。Wiberg中心边缘角在股骨头中心(C)处由垂直参考线(CB)与延伸至髋臼外侧顶部的连线(CE)之间形成,测量股骨头外侧覆盖。

人名命名学

骨盆影像学人名命名法表面上的简单性掩盖了一段复杂的历史。几个熟悉的名字是追溯性地附加到其所谓的创始人自己并未命名的观察结果上的。其他一些则描述了对早期线条的修改或重新解释,而且不同的传统有时会将不同的名字附加到本质上相同的影像学现象上。

Perkins和Ombrédanne在发育不良髋关节评估中的Ombrédanne-Perkins线提供了平行术语的一个例子。Ombrédanne的1923年教科书早于Perkins的1928年论文,包含了本文所找到的关于用于评估股骨头外侧移位的髋臼外侧顶部垂直切线的最早证实描述。Perkins随后描述了一个独立的水平-垂直构造,该构造与Hilgenreiner线结合成为熟悉的现代象限系统。后来的文献将Ombrédanne、Perkins、Putti和Martin术语合并为表面上的同义词,模糊了原始描述的年代顺序。

Klein线和Trethowan征说明了后来的人名替换。Capener-Scham的故事提供了逐步发展的最清晰例子。Capener描述了潜在的解剖结构,Durbin描述了机制,Jacobs描绘了三角形重叠,Scham正式确立了"三角征"。

相反,后来的构造如S征表明有用的影像学线条根本不需要获得人名命名。

原文篇幅较长或含参考文献等附属内容,只翻译了正文部分,其余请阅读原文。

原文图文 · 图 1 张

Hip and pelvic lines and arcs

Eimear Kyle and Mike Cadogan

Sep 17, 2026

Home Medical Specialty Radiology

Pelvic radiographs contain a network of reference lines, arcs, angles and projected contours. They can be used to assess hip alignment, acetabular development, femoral-head coverage and proximal femoral pathology. Some are simple anatomical constructions whilst others retain the names of the clinicians who described, adapted or popularised them.

No single line should be interpreted in isolation. Their relevance changes with skeletal maturity and the pathology being investigated.

Developmental dysplasia in the infant and growing hip

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) during adolescence

Acetabular coverage and pelvic alignment in the mature hip.

Clinical settingPrincipal lines / signs / measurements

Developing HipHilgenreiner, Perkins, Tönnis angle

Reimers migration percentage, Andrén–von Rosen view

Adolescent / SCFEKlein line, Trethowan sign, Capener triangle, Shenton line

Steel metaphyseal blanch sign, S-sign

Mature HipWiberg angle, Sharp angle

Köhler line, Köhler teardrop

Developing / paediatric hip

Assessment of the developing hip depends on reference lines constructed from pelvic landmarks. Hilgenreiner and Perkins provide the basic framework for localisation of the femoral head. Acetabular inclination assesses acetabular development. Reimers quantifies lateral migration and von Rosen provides an additional projectional alignment test.

Hilgenreiner line

A horizontal reference line drawn through the triradiate cartilages on the AP paediatric pelvis. It provides the baseline for assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip and underpins later constructions.

Heinrich Hilgenreiner (1870–1953), German-Bohemian surgeon

Hilgenreiner H. Zur Frühdiagnose und Frühbehandlung der angeborenen Hüftgelenkverrenkung. Medizinische Klinik 1925; 21: 1385-1388, 1425-1429

Perkins line

A vertical reference drawn through the lateral acetabular margin, conventionally perpendicular to Hilgenreiner line. Together the two lines divide the developing hip into quadrants and help localise the proximal femur in DDH.

Although now eponymously associated with George Perkins, an equivalent vertical tangent to the lateral acetabular roof had been described by Louis Ombrédanne in 1923, five years before Perkins’ 1928 publication. Later literature also used the terms Ombrédanne line, Putti line and Martin V-line for closely related vertical acetabular references.

Louis Ombrédanne (1871-1956), French paediatric surgeon

George Perkins (1892–1979), English orthopaedic surgeon

Perkins G. Signs by which to diagnose congenital dislocation of the hip. Lancet 1928: 648-650

Tönnis angle

The acetabular roof angle measured between Hilgenreiner line and the acetabular roof. A larger angle indicates a steeper, less developed acetabulum and supports the diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia. Tönnis standardised and popularised the measurement, building on earlier methods of assessing acetabular inclination.

Dietrich Tönnis (1927-2010)

Tönnis D, Brunken D. Eine Abgrenzung normaler und pathologischer Hüftpfannendachwinkel zur Diagnose der Hüftdysplasie. Auswertungen von 2294 Pfannendachwinkeln kindlicher Hüftgelenke. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1968;64(3):197-228.

Reimers migration percentage

A quantitative measure of how much of the visible femoral head lies lateral to Perkins line on the AP pelvis. Converts hip displacement into a reproducible percentage. Important in hip surveillance, particularly in children with cerebral palsy.

Jørgen Reimers (1931-2008), Danish paediatric orthopaedic surgeon

Reimers J. The stability of the hip in children. A radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1980;184:1-100.

Developing hip: key pelvic lines and measurements. Hilgenreiner line (H)(red) drawn horizontally through the triradiate cartilages. Perkins line (P)(blue) drawn perpendicular to Hilgenreiner line through the lateral acetabular margin. The Tönnis angle (T)(yellow) measures acetabular inclination between Hilgenreiner line and the acetabular roof. Reimers migration percentage (MP)(purple) quantifies lateral femoral-head displacement relative to Perkins line as a/b × 100, where a is the portion of the ossified femoral head lateral to Perkins line and b is the total transverse width of the femoral head.

Andrén–von Rosen view / von Rosen line

A specialised AP projection of the neonatal / paediatric hip obtained with the femora abducted at least 45° and internally rotated. The extended femoral shaft axis points towards the acetabular margin in the reduced hip and towards the ASIS in dislocation.

Erik Sophus von Rosen (1898-1996), Swedish orthopaedic surgeon

Andrén L, Von Rosen S. The diagnosis of dislocation of the hip in newborns and the primary results of immediate treatment. Acta Radiol (Stockh). 1958 Feb;49(2):89-95.

Andrén–von Rosen view: normal and dislocated hips. Specialised AP projection with the femora abducted at least 45° and internally rotated. In the normal / reduced hip (right hip), the extended femoral shaft axis points towards the acetabular margin. In the dislocated hip (left), the extended femoral shaft axis points towards the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The view provides an additional projectional test for developmental displacement of the hip.

Shenton line: cross-age alignment sign

A smooth cervico-obturator arc assessing the relationship between the pelvis and proximal femur. Disruption suggests displacement but is non-specific. It can support assessment of DDH, particularly in walking-age children, and remains useful in adolescent and adult hip pathology. Its sensitivity is lower in neonates, where physiological hip positioning makes the arc less reliable.

Edward Warren Hine Shenton (1872–1955), English radiologist

Shenton EWH. A diagnostic line about the hip joint. Journal of Physical Therapeutics 1902;3:110-12.

Adolescent hip and slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Radiographic signs of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) reflect different consequences of displacement of the capital epiphysis relative to the femoral neck.

On the AP view, Klein line assesses the superior neck–epiphyseal relationship, the Capener triangle reflects acetabular–metaphyseal overlap, and the metaphyseal blanch sign reflects superimposition of the displaced epiphysis and metaphysis. The S-sign assesses contour continuity on the frog-leg lateral projection.

These findings are complementary, and subtle slips may not be apparent from a single AP sign.

Klein – where is the epiphysis relative to the superior neck?

Capener – has normal metaphyseal–acetabular overlap been lost?

Steel – has posterior displacement created metaphyseal superimposition?

S-sign – has the lateral head-neck contour lost its normal continuity?

Klein line / Trethowan sign

The Klein line is formed by extending the straight superior cortical margin of the femoral neck proximally on the AP radiograph. In the normal growing hip it transects a portion of the lateral capital femoral epiphysis. With early SCFE it may intersect less of the epiphysis than expected, while with greater displacement it may fail to intersect the epiphysis completely.

The Trethowan sign is now commonly used for the abnormal superior femoral neck–epiphyseal relationship demonstrated by Klein line. No primary description by William Henry Trethowan has been located. The earliest attribution identified is W. A. Crabbe in 1968, who described loss of the normal angle between the upper femoral-neck border and lateral edge of the epiphysis.

Armin Klein (1892–1954), American orthopaedic surgeon

William Henry Trethowan (1882–1934), English orthopaedic surgeon

Klein A, Joplin RJ, Reidy JA, Hanelin J. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis; early diagnosis and treatment facilitated by normal roentgenograms. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952 Jan;34-A(1):233-9

Crabbe WA. Trethowan’s sign In: Orthopaedics for the Undergraduate 1968

Capener triangle

The Capener triangle (Capener sign; triangular sign; Scham sign) is the normal dense triangular overlap of the inferomedial femoral neck/metaphysis with the posterior acetabular wall on the AP radiograph. With SCFE, displacement reduces this acetabular–metaphyseal overlap, so the triangle becomes smaller or disappears. It is a supplementary sign rather than a stand-alone diagnostic finding.

Capener did not describe a triangle. He described the developmental anatomy underlying the finding in 1956. Durbin (1960) described the mechanism whilst Jacobs (1962) illustrated and clinically evaluated the triangular overlap. Scham described the “dense triangle” in 1968 and formalised the “triangular sign” in 1974.

Norman Leslie Capener (1898-1975), English orthopaedic surgeon

Capener NL. Reconstructive Surgery of the Hip Joint. In: Platt H, ed. Modern Trends in Orthopaedics, 2nd series. 1956: 4-5

Scham SM. The triangular sign in the early diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;(103):16-7

Metaphyseal blanch sign / Steel sign

Metaphyseal blanch sign (Steel sign) is a crescent-shaped area of increased density overlying the proximal femoral metaphysis adjacent to the physis on the AP radiograph. It is a projectional overlap produced by posterior displacement of the capital epiphysis behind the femoral-neck metaphysis. The sign may be present before obvious medial displacement makes Klein line abnormal. A lateral radiograph is required when the finding raises suspicion of SCFE.

Howard Haldeman Steel (1921–2018), American orthopaedic surgeon

Steel HH. The metaphyseal blanch sign of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(6):920–922

AP pelvis in left SCFE. Drag the marker to reveal labels. Abnormal Klein line / Trethowan sign on the affected hip (red), metaphyseal blanch / Steel sign (white arrow) and disrupted Shenton line (green). The normal Capener triangle is demonstrated on the contralateral hip (blue), illustrating its corresponding loss on the slipped side.

S-sign

S-sign is a curvilinear sign described on the frog-leg lateral radiograph. The line follows the posteroinferior cortex of the proximal femur from the lesser trochanter, continues along the femoral neck and across the physis, and curves around towards the midpoint of the femoral head. In the normal hip the contour is smooth; broken continuity, asymmetry or a sharp turn is abnormal and may indicate SCFE.

In the original observer study, the S-sign outperformed Klein line and showed better interobserver agreement, although sensitivity remained lower in mild slips.

Rebich EJ, Lee SS, Schlechter JA. The S Sign: A New Radiographic Tool to Aid in the Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(6):835–843.

S-sign on the frog-leg lateral projection. The normal S-sign forms a smooth curvilinear contour from the lesser trochanter along the posteroinferior femoral neck, across the physis and around the femoral head. In SCFE the contour becomes discontinuous, asymmetric or sharply angulated. Adapted from Rebich, Lee and Schlechter (2018)

Acetabular morphology / mature hip

In the skeletally mature hip, pelvic reference lines are useful for assessment of acetabular coverage, orientation, pelvic-column integrity and hip congruity. Quantitative measurements include the centre-edge angle of Wiberg and Sharp angle. Projected anatomical contours include the ilioischial and iliopectineal lines, acetabular walls and teardrop.

Most mature-hip landmarks are anatomical rather than eponymous. The iliopectineal line outlines the anterior pelvic column/pelvic brim, while the anterior and posterior acetabular wall contours help assess acetabular orientation and coverage. Together with the ilioischial line, teardrop and Shenton arc, they form part of the radiographic picture of the AP pelvis.

Centre-edge angle of Wiberg

Centre-edge angle of Wiberg measures lateral acetabular coverage of the femoral head. The angle is formed at the femoral-head centre between a vertical reference and a line to the lateral acetabular roof. Smaller values indicate reduced coverage. Wiberg introduced the measurement in 1939, although both the reference axis and lateral acetabular endpoint have since evolved.

Gunnar Wiberg (1902–1988), Swedish orthopaedic surgeon

Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip. Acta chirurgica Scandinavica 1939;83(58):5-135.

Sharp angle / Ullmann–Sharp angle

The Sharp angle measures overall acetabular inclination independently of femoral-head position. It is formed between a horizontal line through the inferior pelvic teardrops and a line from the teardrop to the lateral acetabular roof. Increasing values indicate a steeper acetabulum. Sharp described and evaluated the measurement in 1961, although Tönnis later attributed an equivalent construction to Karl Ullmann in 1938.

Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B(2):268–272.

Köhler line

Köhler line (ilioischial line) is the projected medial pelvic contour extending from the ilium towards the medial ischium. It provides a reference for medial acetabular depth. The acetabular wall crossing medial to the line indicates a deep acetabulum, while medial projection of the femoral head itself defines radiographic protrusio acetabuli.

Alban Köhler (1874–1947), German radiologist

Köhler A. Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillem; 1905

Köhler teardrop

Köhler teardrop (pelvic teardrop; U-figure) is a U- or teardrop-shaped summation shadow medial to the acetabulum on the AP pelvis. It results from tangential projection of several acetabular and pelvic cortical surfaces. The teardrop is used as a landmark in assessment of acetabular morphology, depth, medial migration and symmetry. Köhler originally called this the Tränenfigur (“tear figure”) and demonstrated that its appearance varied with projection.

Alban Köhler (1874–1947), German radiologist

Köhler A. Die normale und pathologische Anatomie des Hüftgelenks und Oberschenkels in röntgenographischer Darstellung. Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillem; 1905

Mature hip: key eponymous pelvic lines, angles and landmarks. Drag the marker to reveal labels. Köhler line (KL) follows the ilioischial contour and provides a reference for medial acetabular depth and protrusio. The Sharp angle (SA) is formed between the horizontal inter-teardrop reference and a line from the inferior teardrop to the lateral acetabular roof, measuring acetabular inclination. The Köhler teardrop (TD) is the characteristic U-shaped summation shadow medial to the acetabulum. The centre-edge angle of Wiberg is formed at the femoral-head centre (C) between the vertical reference (CB) and a line extending to the lateral acetabular roof (CE), measuring lateral femoral-head coverage.

Eponymythology

The apparent simplicity of pelvic radiographic eponyms conceals a complicated history. Several familiar names were attached retrospectively to observations that their supposed originators did not themselves name. Others describe modifications or reinterpretations of earlier lines, and different traditions have occasionally attached different names to essentially the same radiographic phenomenon.

Perkins and Ombrédanne provide an example of parallel terminology in assessment of the dysplastic hip with the Ombrédanne–Perkins line. Ombrédanne’s 1923 textbook predates Perkins’ 1928 paper and contains the earliest verified description located here of the vertical tangent to the lateral acetabular roof used to assess lateral femoral-head displacement. Perkins subsequently described an independent horizontal–vertical construction which became incorporated with Hilgenreiner line into the familiar modern quadrant system. Later sources collapsed Ombrédanne, Perkins, Putti and Martin terminology into apparent synonymy, obscuring the chronology of the original descriptions.

Klein line and Trethowan sign illustrate later eponymic substitution. The Capener–Scham story provides the clearest example of progressive development. Capener described the underlying anatomy, Durbin described the mechanism, Jacobs illustrated the triangular overlap, and Scham formalised the “triangular sign”.

Conversely, later constructs such as the S-sign show that useful radiographic lines need not acquire an eponym at all.

References

Campbell SE. Radiography of the hip: lines, signs, and patterns of disease. Semin Roentgenol. 2005 Jul;40(3):290-319.

Yeap PM, Budak MJ. The pelvic radiograph: lines, arcs and stripes. Singapore Med J. 2021 Jul;62(7):333-340.

Bi AS, Carter C, Price AE, Litrenta J, Karamitopoulos M, Castañeda PG. A history of eponym usage in hip and pelvis radiography part 1: the paediatric hip. Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):136-143.

Bi AS, Ryan MK, Castañeda PG, Youm T. A history of eponym usage in hip and pelvis radiography part 2: the adult hip. Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):144-151

eponymictionary

the names behind the name

more eponyms…

Eimear Kyle

MB BAO BCh Trinity College Dublin, MSc Clinical Data Analytics University of Galway. Junior doctor in Perth, doctoral researcher in MRI radiomics. Working towards radiology training.

Mike Cadogan

BA MA (Oxon) MBChB (Edin) FACEM FFSEM. Emergency physician, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital. Passion for rugby, medical history, medical education, and asynchronous learning #FOAMed evangelist. Editor-in-Chief and Webmaster of Life in the Fast lane, LITFL | On Call 4e| Eponyms | Books | Horology |

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

来源:LITFL,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

参考来源

  1. Life in the Fast Lane • LITFL:Hip and pelvic lines and arcs
  2. 全文:LITFL(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,署名:Eimear Kyle and Mike Cadogan)https://litfl.com/hip-and-pelvic-lines-arcs-and-eponyms/

供执业医师抢救与诊疗参考,不替代临床判断;剂量请结合体重、肝肾功能和本院药品规格复核,以指南原文为准。