文献速递复苏、休克与脓毒症

Multicenter Validation of Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes.

PubMed 文献 · JAMA Netw Open · 2026-06-01

IMPORTANCE: Four clinical phenotypes of sepsis based on data from electronic health records have been proposed. Although promising, the generalizability of these phenotypes remains uncertain, and multisite validation is needed.…

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

IMPORTANCE: Four clinical phenotypes of sepsis based on data from electronic health records have been proposed. Although promising, the generalizability of these phenotypes remains uncertain, and multisite validation is needed.

OBJECTIVE: To validate, using the same methods and inclusion criteria, the 4 clinical phenotypes derived from Sepsis Endotyping in Emergency Care (SENECA) data.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multisite retrospective cohort study uses data on adult patients admitted to the emergency departments in Stockholm, Sweden (January 1, 2011, to September 1, 2023); Oxford, England (February 4, 2014, to June 20, 2021); and Oslo, Norway (January 4, 2019, to October 9, 2023) university hospitals. Included encounters are those with body fluid cultures taken, documented antibiotic administration, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 2 or more, all within 6 hours of admission. Data analysis was conducted from November 2, 2023, to September 1, 2025.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Consensus clustering with k-means was used to derive 4 clinical phenotypes at each site, comparing them with the SENECA-derived phenotypes, as well as with one another.

RESULTS: There were 30 865 patient encounters in Stockholm (mean [SD] age, 68 [16] years; 18 165 men [59%]), 15 575 in Oxford (mean [SD] age, 71 [18] years; 9067 men [58%]), and 1806 in Oslo (mean [SD] age, 71 [17] years; 1068 men [59%]). There was little consistency between the SENECA clinical phenotypes and each site's own phenotypes, with a Cohen κ of 0.32 for Stockholm, 0.37 for Oslo, and 0.40 for Oxford; the Adjusted Rand Indices were 0.21 for Stockholm, 0.27 for Oslo, and 0.26 for Oxford. There was also little consistency between the phenotypes derived in Stockholm, Oxford, and Oslo.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the 4 clinical phenotypes of the SENECA data are not generalizable across 3 independent cohorts. This calls for further exploration of possible underlying sepsis subgroups using alternative approaches that mitigate the inherent stochasticity in many unsupervised and semisupervised clustering methods.

来源:JAMA Netw Open,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

参考来源

  1. Yoon CH, Sjöholm D, Wickstrøm KE, et al. Multicenter Validation of Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes. JAMA Netw Open. 2026. PMID: 42223936. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.16134

供执业医师抢救与诊疗参考,不替代临床判断;剂量请结合体重、肝肾功能和本院药品规格复核,以指南原文为准。