文献速递重症综合管理与镇静镇痛复苏、休克与脓毒症

Admission-day SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality discrimination: external validation in a large multicenter ICU database.

PubMed 文献 · Crit Care · 2026-04-12

BACKGROUND: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score was developed to better reflect contemporary critical care practice by incorporating modern organ support modalities and updated thresholds based on recent data.…

英文原文(摘要)· 点击展开

BACKGROUND: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score was developed to better reflect contemporary critical care practice by incorporating modern organ support modalities and updated thresholds based on recent data. However, the generalizability of this framework to intensive care unit (ICU) populations beyond the development cohort, particularly across organ support subgroups and major disease categories, remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the external validity of SOFA-2 using the OneICU database, a large Japanese critical care database with comprehensive domain-level data. METHODS: Adult ICU stays between February 2013 and August 2025 were included and classified into two cohorts: those with complete SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 component data on the day of ICU admission, and those with complete SOFA-2 data on that day. Discriminatory performance for ICU mortality was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared between SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 using the DeLong test. Subgroup analyses were performed by major organ support device use and across disease categories. RESULTS: Among 152,883 eligible ICU stays, 67,116 had complete SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 data, and 121,443 had complete SOFA-2 data. SOFA-2 showed a slightly higher AUROC for ICU mortality than SOFA-1 (0.859 vs. 0.853; p < 0.001), although the absolute difference was small. Across subgroups defined by mechanical circulatory support use, SOFA-2 showed higher discrimination than SOFA-1. Discrimination was similar in other device-defined subgroups and in patients readmitted to the ICU. SOFA-2 also demonstrated good discrimination across major diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: SOFA-2 showed similar discrimination for ICU mortality compared with SOFA-1 and maintained broadly comparable performance across clinically relevant subgroups, supporting its applicability for early severity assessment in heterogeneous ICU populations.

来源:Crit Care,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

参考来源

  1. Iwasaki Y, Kinoshita T, Yoshimura J, et al. Admission-day SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality discrimination: external validation in a large multicenter ICU database. Crit Care. 2026. PMID: 41968305. doi:10.1186/s13054-026-06020-x

供执业医师抢救与诊疗参考,不替代临床判断;剂量请结合体重、肝肾功能和本院药品规格复核,以指南原文为准。