文献速递产科母胎医学

慢性高血压孕妇胎儿生长受限是否增加子痫前期进展

In women with chronic hypertension, does fetal growth restriction increase progression to maternal preeclampsia?
PubMed 文献 · Am J Obstet Gynecol · 2026-04-15

本研究为前瞻性队列的二次分析,纳入1258例慢性高血压单胎孕妇,在孕35+0至36+6周行常规胎儿超声。比较估测胎儿体重<第10百分位(含或不含胎儿生长受限)与≥第10百分位对照组的子痫前期发生率。结果显示,伴胎儿生长受限者更常出现子痫前期及不良妊娠结局,应加强母胎监测。

要点

  • 孕35-36周超声示胎儿生长受限的慢性高血压孕妇更易进展为子痫前期。
  • 仅估测胎儿体重<第10百分位而无多普勒异常者,子痫前期风险未见增加。
  • 胎儿生长受限者分娩更早、新生儿入住病房更多,需加强母胎监测。

核心结论

  • 慢性高血压孕妇孕35-36周存在胎儿生长受限者,较对照组更常出现子痫前期,应加强母胎监测。
  • 仅估测胎儿体重<第10百分位(无胎儿生长受限)者,子痫前期发生未见增加。

研究设计与样本

  • 本研究为前瞻性队列的二次分析,纳入1258例慢性高血压单胎孕妇。
  • 所有孕妇在孕35+0至36+6周接受常规胎儿超声检查。
  • 研究采用倾向评分匹配,按1:2比例、卡钳值0.2个logit标准差进行最近邻无放回匹配。
  • 匹配协变量包括母体种族、受孕方式、吸烟、系统性红斑狼疮、产次、子痫前期史、低出生体重史、年龄、体质指数及孕期增重。

主要发现

  • 1258例中,167例(13.3%)为估测胎儿体重<第10百分位病例,其中64例(38.3%)为胎儿生长受限。
  • 1258例中,234例(18.6%)发展为子痫前期。
  • 胎儿生长受限组较匹配对照组更常发生子痫前期、引产、剖宫产,超声至分娩间隔缩短1.8周。
  • 胎儿生长受限组分娩提前1.7周,更多出现新生儿出生体重<第10百分位或入住新生儿病房。
  • 无胎儿生长受限但估测胎儿体重<第10百分位者,与对照组比较子痫前期无差异,但超声至分娩间隔缩短0.8周。

关键数值与推荐

  • 胎儿生长受限定义为估测胎儿体重<第10百分位且胎儿多普勒异常。
  • 胎儿多普勒异常包括子宫动脉搏动指数>第95百分位、脐动脉搏动指数>第95百分位或大脑中动脉搏动指数<第5百分位。
  • 子痫前期按母体标准定义,包括传统新发蛋白尿或2019年美国妇产科医师学会、2021年国际妊娠高血压研究学会附加母体标准。
  • 匹配后平衡采用标准化均数差评估,<0.1视为平衡充分。

临床怎么用

  • 慢性高血压孕妇在孕35-36周超声提示胎儿生长受限时,应考虑加强母胎监测。
  • 仅估测胎儿体重<第10百分位而无多普勒异常者,暂不需要因此改变子痫前期监测策略。

局限性

  • 研究结果尚需在更早孕周重复验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

BACKGROUND: Among women with chronic hypertension, it is unclear whether uteroplacental dysfunction should be classified as indicating superimposed preeclampsia or be considered a direct complication of chronic hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fetal growth concerns at a routine fetal ultrasound at 35+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation were related to progression to preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: We undertook a secondary analysis of a prospectively evaluated cohort of women with chronic hypertension and singleton pregnancies who underwent routine fetal ultrasound at 35+0-36+6 weeks' gestation. We compared the incidence of preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes between cases and propensity score-matched controls; cases had an estimated fetal weight <10th percentile, with and without fetal growth restriction, defined as abnormal fetal Dopplers (uterine artery pulsatility index >95th percentile, umbilical artery pulsatility index >95th percentile, or middle cerebral artery pulsatility index <5th percentile), and controls had estimated fetal weight ≥10th percentile. Superimposed preeclampsia was defined by maternal criteria, either traditionally by the development of new-onset proteinuria at ≥20 weeks or by additional maternal criteria according to the 2019 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists or 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy guidance. Covariates included in propensity score-matched were maternal race/ethnicity, mode of conception, smoking status, systemic lupus erythematosus, parity, history of preeclampsia, history of a baby with birthweight <10th percentile, maternal age, body mass index, and gestational weight gain in kilograms. Matching was conducted using a nearest-neighbor algorithm without replacement, a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls, and a caliper width of 0.2 standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score. Balance between groups after matching was assessed using standardized mean differences, with values <0.1 considered indicative of adequate balance. RESULTS: Of the 1258 included pregnancies with chronic hypertension, there were 167 (13.3%) cases (64, 38.3% of which were designated as fetal growth restriction cases with abnormal fetal Dopplers), and 1091 (86.7%) controls. Of 1258 women, 234 (18.6%) went on to develop preeclampsia. After propensity score matching analysis, there were no differences between the 167 cases and 334 propensity score-matched controls in baseline maternal or 35-36 weeks' characteristics. Cases with fetal growth restriction (vs propensity score-matched controls) more often developed preeclampsia (regardless of definition), underwent labor induction, had a cesarean delivery, and had a shorter ultrasound-to-birth interval by 1.8 weeks; they also delivered 1.7 weeks earlier and more often had babies with birthweight <10th percentile for gestational age or those admitted to the neonatal unit. There was no difference between groups in the composite neonatal outcome. Cases without fetal growth restriction (vs propensity score-matched controls) did not differ with regard to the development of preeclampsia, but they did have a shorter ultrasound-to-birth interval (by 0.8 weeks), delivered 0.7 weeks earlier, and more often had babies with birthweight <10th percentile. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that women with chronic hypertension who have evidence of fetal growth restriction at 35-36 weeks' gestation (but not those with only an estimated fetal weight <10th percentile) more frequently develop maternal manifestations of superimposed preeclampsia and should be considered for enhanced maternal and fetal surveillance. These findings should be replicated at earlier gestational ages.

来源:Am J Obstet Gynecol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Magee, Chatzakis, Syngelaki, et al. In women with chronic hypertension, does fetal growth restriction increase progression to maternal preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026. PMID: 41997519. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.04.014

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。