胎儿镜激光凝固术中静脉-静脉吻合顺序对双胎输血综合征结局的影响
本研究为Sequential试验的事后分析,比较双胎输血综合征激光凝固术中静脉-静脉吻合先凝固与后凝固的生存差异。64例有静脉-静脉吻合者中,先凝固组供血儿生存82.1%,后凝固组69.4%,无浅表吻合组90.3%。调整后后凝固组供血儿生存几率显著降低(aOR 0.24)。
要点
- 静脉-静脉吻合后凝固与供血儿和受血儿生存率降低相关。
- 静脉-静脉吻合先凝固组供血儿生存率高于后凝固组。
- 该分析为事后探索性,需进一步研究验证。
核心结论
- 在双胎输血综合征胎儿镜激光凝固术中,手术结束时处理静脉-静脉吻合与供血儿和受血儿生存率降低相关。
研究设计与样本
- Sequential试验的事后分析,该试验为比较顺序与选择性激光凝固技术的随机对照试验,共642例患者,其中64例(10%)有至少一个静脉-静脉吻合。
主要发现
- 无浅表吻合组供血儿活产率为421/466(90.3%),静脉-静脉吻合组为48/64(75.0%)(P=.001)。
- 静脉-静脉吻合组中,28例(43.8%)随机分配至先凝固,36例(56.3%)分配至后凝固。
- 无浅表吻合组、先凝固组、后凝固组的供血儿生存率分别为90.3%、82.1%、69.4%(P<.001);受血儿生存率分别为94.2%、96.4%、86.1%(P=.128)。
- 调整模型中,后凝固组供血儿生存的调整比值比为0.24(0.10-0.58;P=.002),受血儿为0.30(0.10-0.92;P=.035),均以无浅表吻合组为参照。
临床怎么用
- 对于存在静脉-静脉吻合的双胎输血综合征病例,可考虑优先凝固静脉-静脉吻合以改善供血儿生存。
局限性
- 本研究为事后探索性分析,样本量有限,结果需进一步验证。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the sequence of laser occlusion of vein-to-vein placental anastomoses is associated with fetal survival after laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis used data from the Sequential Trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing sequential vs selective laser photocoagulation techniques. Within this trial, a nested randomization assigned patients with superficial anastomoses (ie, artery-to-artery or vein-to-vein) to ablation of these anastomoses either at the beginning or at the end of surgery. For this analysis, we compared survival in patients with vein-to-vein anastomoses with a reference group lacking superficial anastomoses. Variables associated with survival were included in multiple logistic regression models, including the nested assignment to "Ablated First" vs "Ablated Last." RESULTS: Of 642 trial patients, 64 (10%) had at least one vein-to-vein anastomosis (range, 1-3). Donor live birth was 421/466 (90.3%) in the No Superficial Anastomoses group and 48/64 (75.0%) in the vein-to-vein group (P=.001). Among the 64 patients with vein-to-vein anastomoses, 28 (43.8%) were randomized to Ablated First and 36 (56.3%) to Ablated Last. Donor survival in the No Superficial Anastomoses, Ablated First, and Ablated Last groups was 90.3%, 82.1%, and 69.4%, respectively (P<.001). Recipient survival was 94.2%, 96.4%, and 86.1% (P=.128). In adjusted models, the Ablated Last group had lower odds of donor survival (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 [0.10-0.58]; P=.002) and recipient survival (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30 [0.10-0.92]; P=.035) compared with the No Superficial Anastomoses group. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, end-of-procedure treatment of vein-to-vein anastomoses for twin-twin transfusion syndrome was associated with lower donor and recipient survival.
引用
- Chmait RH, Korst LM, Llanes AS, et al. Does the order of ablation of vein-to-vein placental connections during fetoscopic laser photocoagulation affect outcomes in twin-twin transfusion syndrome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026. PMID: 42178085. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.05.011
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。