产前MRI探索腹裂胎儿血流动力学改变:对胎儿生长受限的启示
本研究回顾性分析86例腹裂、27例脐膨出及27例健康对照的产前MRI,发现腹裂胎儿FGR发生率为66.3%,复杂腹裂为86.7%。腹壁缺损处脐静脉直径Z评分、胎盘厚度、胎盘分叶及复杂腹裂是FGR的独立危险因素,脐静脉狭窄与FGR及不良结局相关。
要点
- 腹裂胎儿FGR发生率66.3%,复杂腹裂达86.7%。
- 腹壁缺损处脐静脉直径Z评分是FGR独立危险因素,AUC 0.81。
- 胎盘厚度增加和胎盘分叶也是FGR的独立危险因素。
核心结论
- 腹壁缺损处脐静脉狭窄与腹裂胎儿发生FGR强相关。
- 脐静脉直径测量和胎盘评估可能成为预测腹裂胎儿FGR的重要影像生物标志物。
研究设计与样本
- 单中心回顾性研究,纳入86例腹裂胎儿、27例脐膨出胎儿和27例年龄匹配健康对照,分析产前MRI。
主要发现
- 腹裂胎儿FGR发生率为66.3%(57/86),复杂腹裂为86.7%(26/30),脐膨出为18.5%(5/27)。
- FGR独立危险因素包括:腹壁缺损处脐静脉直径Z评分(aOR 0.76,95%CI 0.65-0.89,P=0.001)、胎盘厚度(aOR 1.57,95%CI 1.13-2.05,P=0.015)、胎盘分叶(aOR 1.84,95%CI 1.45-2.32,P=0.026)及复杂腹裂(aOR 2.33,95%CI 1.85-2.96,P=0.003)。
- 脐静脉直径Z评分预测FGR的AUC为0.81(95%CI 0.73-0.84)。
- 合并FGR的腹裂胎儿较无FGR腹裂、脐膨出及健康对照,腹壁缺损处脐静脉直径更小、胎盘更厚、胎盘分叶更多、左右肝叶T2*信号强度差异更大。
- 网络分析显示脐静脉狭窄、FGR、胎盘FVM及不良结局之间存在相互依赖关系。
临床怎么用
- 产前MRI测量腹壁缺损处脐静脉直径和评估胎盘特征有助于预测腹裂胎儿FGR风险。
- 对于腹裂胎儿,尤其复杂腹裂,应警惕FGR并加强监测。
局限性
- 单中心回顾性设计可能限制结果外推。
- 未来需研究胎儿干预减轻严重脐静脉狭窄的潜在获益。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
OBJECTIVE: Despite the high incidence of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in gastroschisis (GS) associated with placental fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether umbilical vein (UV) stenosis at the abdominal wall defect impairs fetoplacental circulation, leading to FGR. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in fetuses with GS was performed. The presence of FGR and complex GS was recorded after birth. Systematic measurements of UV diameter were collected, as well as placental characteristics. Multivariable analysis identified in-utero risk factors for FGR. Area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUC) for the predictive performance of predictors of FGR was calculated. In addition, 1:1 age-matched omphalocele and healthy control cases were included for comparison with GS cases with and without FGR, examining UV diameter, placental features and T2* signal intensity (SI) differences between the left and right hepatic lobes. Co-occurrence network analysis integrated prenatal MRI findings with postnatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 86 GS cases, 27 omphalocele cases and 27 age-matched healthy control cases were included. The incidence of FGR was 66.3% (57/86) in all GS cases, 86.7% (26/30) in complex GS cases and 18.5% (5/27) in omphalocele cases. Multivariable analysis identified the following independent risk factors for FGR: Z-score of UV diameter at the defect (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.89); P = 0.001); placental thickness (aOR, 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13-2.05); P = 0.015); placental lobulation (aOR, 1.84 (95% CI, 1.45-2.32); P = 0.026); and the presence of complex GS (aOR, 2.33 (95% CI, 1.85-2.96); P = 0.003). The Z-score of the UV diameter at the abdominal wall defect had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.84) for the presence of FGR. Compared to the GS without FGR, omphalocele and healthy control groups, the GS with FGR group exhibited significantly reduced UV diameter at the abdominal wall defect, greater placental thickness, increased placental lobulation and larger T2* SI differences between the left and right hepatic lobes, reflecting hypoxia-driven circulatory redistribution. Network analysis demonstrated interdependencies among UV stenosis, FGR, placental FVM and adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is strong association between UV stenosis at the abdominal wall defect and the development of FGR in cases of GS. UV diameter measurements and placental assessment may constitute important imaging biomarkers for FGR prediction in cases of GS. Ultimately, future research is required to evaluate potential benefits of fetal intervention to reduce severe UV stenosis. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
- Shi H, Prayer D, Kienast P, et al. Exploring hemodynamic alterations in gastroschisis: insights into fetal growth restriction using prenatal MRI. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2026. PMID: 42139668. doi:10.1002/uog.70232
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。