辅助生殖妊娠中无创产前检测作为筛查试验的诊断准确性系统评价与荟萃分析
该系统评价与荟萃分析纳入13项研究,评估辅助生殖技术(ART)妊娠中无创产前检测(NIPT)对常见染色体异常的筛查准确性。结果显示,在ART单胎和双胎妊娠中,NIPT对常见染色体异常合并的汇总灵敏度约为88.2%,特异度高于99.6%;对21三体的灵敏度约为87%,特异度高于99.7%。结论指出,尽管特异度高,但ART妊娠中NIPT对常见胎儿染色体非整倍体(尤其21三体)的灵敏度显著低于自然妊娠。
要点
- ART单胎妊娠中NIPT对常见染色体异常合并的汇总灵敏度88.2%、特异度99.6%。
- ART双胎妊娠中NIPT对常见染色体异常合并的汇总灵敏度88.2%、特异度99.8%。
- ART妊娠中NIPT对21三体的灵敏度约87%,显著低于自然妊娠。
核心结论
- 在ART妊娠中,NIPT对常见胎儿染色体非整倍体的特异度高,但灵敏度(尤其对21三体)显著低于自然妊娠。
研究设计与样本
- 系统评价与荟萃分析,纳入13项横断面或队列研究,对象为ART受孕后选择NIPT产前检测的孕妇。
主要发现
- 单胎ART妊娠中,NIPT对常见染色体异常合并的汇总灵敏度为88.2%(95%CI 61.0%-97.3%),特异度为99.6%(95%CI 98.4%-99.9%)。
- 双胎ART妊娠中,NIPT对常见染色体异常合并的汇总灵敏度为88.2%(95%CI 66.4%-96.6%),特异度为99.8%(95%CI 99.6%-99.9%)。
- 单胎ART妊娠中,NIPT对21三体的汇总灵敏度为87.2%(95%CI 59.0%-97.0%),特异度为99.7%(95%CI 98.8%-99.9%)。
- 双胎ART妊娠中,NIPT对21三体的汇总灵敏度为86.9%(95%CI 63.4%-96.2%),特异度为99.8%(95%CI 99.6%-99.9%)。
临床怎么用
- 在ART妊娠中采用NIPT筛查时,应告知患者其灵敏度低于自然妊娠,尤其对21三体的检测。
- 临床咨询需结合ART妊娠中NIPT较高的特异度与相对较低的灵敏度,个体化解读结果。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
IMPORTANCE: The accuracy of the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common trisomies remains unclear in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology (ART), and the adoption of NIPT as a prenatal screening test in ART pregnancies has been cautious because of the absence of clear recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of NIPT for screening for common chromosomal abnormalities compared with conventional karyotype or microarray testing in ART pregnancies. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of the following: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, and cross-sectional and cohort studies of antenatal women who conceived following ART and opted for prenatal testing with NIPT were included. MAIN OUTCOMES: Pooled sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for common chromosomal abnormalities (trisomy 21, 18, and 13). RESULTS: We identified a total of 548 records through electronic searches and finally included 13 studies for quantitative synthesis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for combined abnormalities in singleton ART pregnancies were 88.2% (95% confidence interval, [CI] 61.0%-97.3%) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.4%-99.9%), respectively. Similarly, for twin ART pregnancies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for combined abnormalities were 88.2% (95% CI 66.4%-96.6%) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 in singleton ART pregnancies were 87.2% (95% CI 59.0%-97.0%) and 99.7% (95% CI 98.8%-99.9%), respectively, whereas in ART twin pregnancies, the pooled sensitivity was 86.9% (95% CI 63.4%-96.2%) and the specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Although the specificity of NIPT is high in ART-conceived pregnancies, its sensitivity in the detection of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy, in particular trisomy 21, is substantially lower than in naturally conceived pregnancies.
引用
- Kamath V, Sivakumar MB, Callado GY, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing as a prenatal screening test in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2026. PMID: 42069112. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.04.017
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。