文献速递生殖医学

改良自然周期冻胚移植中的黄体期孕酮支持:系统综述与荟萃分析

Luteal phase progesterone support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PubMed 文献 · Reprod Biomed Online · 2026-04-22

该系统综述与荟萃分析评估改良自然周期冻胚移植(mNC-FET)中孕酮黄体期支持(LPS)对活产率的影响,纳入7项研究共3896个周期。结果显示孕酮LPS与无LPS相比活产率无差异(OR 1.15,95%CI 0.98-1.36;aOR 1.07,95%CI 0.64-1.79),临床妊娠率仅在粗分析中升高,妊娠丢失率相似。结果不支持mNC-FET中常规使用孕酮LPS。

要点

  • 孕酮LPS未显著提高mNC-FET的活产率(OR 1.15,95%CI 0.98-1.36)。
  • 临床妊娠率仅在粗分析中升高(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.04-1.40),校正后无差异。
  • 妊娠丢失率在LPS与无LPS间相似(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.70-1.38)。

核心结论

  • 现有证据不支持mNC-FET中常规使用孕酮黄体期支持以改善活产率。
  • 特定亚组是否需要个体化黄体期支持尚待确定。

研究设计与样本

  • 系统综述与荟萃分析,检索纳入8项符合条件的研究。
  • 荟萃分析纳入7项研究(3项随机对照试验和4项回顾性队列研究),共3896个周期。

主要发现

  • 5项研究(包括3项RCT)未发现孕酮LPS在mNC-FET中有获益。
  • 活产率:LPS与无LPS比较,OR 1.15(95%CI 0.98-1.36),aOR 1.07(95%CI 0.64-1.79)。
  • 临床妊娠率:粗分析OR 1.21(95%CI 1.04-1.40),校正分析aOR 1.15(95%CI 0.87-1.51)。
  • 妊娠丢失率:LPS与无LPS相似,OR 0.98(95%CI 0.70-1.38)。

临床怎么用

  • 对于采用HCG扳机的mNC-FET,不应常规添加孕酮黄体期支持。
  • 临床决策需结合患者个体情况,亚组获益人群尚不明确。

局限性

  • 纳入研究包含回顾性队列设计,可能存在混杂偏倚。
  • 亚组人群是否需要个体化LPS尚无法确定。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

Modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (mNC-FET) using an exogenous human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) trigger is a widely used endometrial preparation protocol. The need for luteal phase support (LPS) in mNC-FET remains uncertain. The primary outcome of this systematic review and meta-analysis was the impact of progesterone LPS on the live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and pregnancy loss rate (PLR). A systematic literature search identified eight eligible studies, of which seven [three randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four retrospective cohort studies] were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3896 cycles. Five studies, including the three RCT, found no benefit of progesterone LPS in mNC-FET. Using study-reported OR and adjusted OR (aOR), the meta-analysis showed no difference in LBR between progesterone LPS and no LPS (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.36; aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.64-1.79). CPR increased with LPS in the crude analysis (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.40), but not in the adjusted analysis (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.51). PLR was similar between LPS and no LPS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.70-1.38). These results do not support a general benefit of progesterone LPS in mNC-FET. It remains to be determined whether certain subgroups require an individualized approach.

来源:Reprod Biomed Online,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Engesgaard FM, Johansen AS, Saupstad M, et al. Luteal phase progesterone support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2026. PMID: 42160980. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105731

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。