P3OPPY试点试验:社区健康工作者与数字健康干预在孕期中的可接受性与可行性
结果显示招募与随机化可行,参与者对两种干预满意度高,支持开展以临床结局为主要终点的大型随机对照试验。
要点
- 社区健康工作者组18/21推荐该干预,数字健康干预组18/20推荐该干预。
- 社区健康工作者组参与者满意度均为10/10(n=18),数字健康干预组中位满意度8/10(IQR 7-10,n=18)。
- 参与者中位产前检查11次,中位分娩孕周37周,5例(13%)妊娠丢失,25%新生儿入住NICU。
核心结论
- 在围产期干预试验中成功招募并随机化参与者,参与者对数字健康干预和社区健康工作者干预报告了高满意度,支持开展以关键临床结局为主要终点的大型随机对照试验。
研究设计与样本
- 单中心、平行随机对照试点试验,采用2×2析因设计,参与者随机分配至数字健康干预 vs 常规护理和社区健康工作者 vs 常规护理,实施者设盲。
- 纳入标准为非西班牙裔黑人、年龄16至49岁、孕8⁰至22⁶周、居住在阿拉巴马州资源匮乏社区(区域剥夺指数60至100)。
主要发现
- 中位年龄29岁,入组时中位孕周14周,中位区域剥夺指数90;78%经产,18%已婚,60%高中及以下学历,80%公共保险。
- 随机至社区健康工作者组的参与者中18/21推荐该干预;随机至数字健康干预组的参与者中18/20推荐该干预。
- 社区健康工作者组参与者满意度均为10/10(100%应答,n=18);数字健康干预组中位满意度评分8/10(IQR 7-10,n=18)。
- 参与者中位产前检查11次,中位分娩孕周37周;5例(13%)发生妊娠丢失,25%新生儿入住新生儿重症监护室。
临床怎么用
- 社区健康工作者和数字健康干预在资源匮乏社区的高风险孕妇中具有可接受性和可行性,可考虑作为围产期支持手段。
- 试点试验的招募与随机化流程可行,为后续大型随机对照试验的设计提供了依据。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
BACKGROUND: Persistent racial inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black pregnant women in the United States, particularly those living in socioeconomically deprived communities. Community health worker (CHW) programs and digital health interventions (DHI) show promise for improving perinatal outcomes, yet few randomized trials have evaluated their acceptability or feasibility in high-risk perinatal populations. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of randomizing participants in a perinatal intervention trial and ascertain whether participants found the interventions acceptable. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, parallel RCT including non-Hispanic Black participants, between 16 and 49 years, 8⁰ and 22⁶ weeks gestational age (GA), and residing in resource-poor communities in Alabama, defined as Area Deprivation Index (ADI) 60 to 100. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, participants were randomly assigned to DHI vs usual care and to CHW vs usual care; providers were blinded. The primary outcome for this pilot was acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included recruitment feasibility, participant's intervention satisfaction (1-10 scale, 10 highest satisfaction), number of prenatal care (PNC) visits, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Forty participants were successfully recruited and randomized from July to October 2023. Median age, GA at enrollment, and ADI were 29 years, 14 weeks, and 90; 78% were parous, 18% were married, 60% had ≤ a high school diploma, and 80% were publicly insured. Of those randomized to CHW, 18/21 recommended CHW care; of those randomized to DHI, 18/20 recommended DHI care. Participants randomized to CHW were highly satisfied (100% responded 10/10; n=18); DHI participants were also highly satisfied (median satisfaction score 8/10, IQR 7-10, n=18). Participants attended a median 11 PNC visits and delivered at a median GA of 37 weeks; 5 (13%) experienced pregnancy loss and 25% of neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Participants were successfully recruited and randomized in a perinatal intervention trial and reported high rates of satisfaction with DHI and CHW interventions, lending support for a large RCT powered for key clinical outcomes.
引用
- Sinkey R, Leach JM, Shukla VV, et al. Providing an optimized and emPowered pregnancy for you (P3OPPY) acceptability and feasibility pilot trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2026. PMID: 42107527. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101986
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。