BRCA1/2致病性变异女性携带者风险降低干预措施的使用:不列颠哥伦比亚省基于人群的研究
该研究基于加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省1996至2019年检测为BRCA1/2致病性变异阳性的1920名女性,利用行政健康数据追踪至2023年底。结果显示,无乳腺癌史者中20.8%接受双侧乳房切除术且近年使用率下降;符合NCCN推荐RRBSO年龄范围者中71.8%接受RRBSO,约5%接受风险降低性输卵管切除术;仅25.4%无卵巢癌史者在推荐年龄内接受手术风险降低。BRCA披露延迟是主要原因,化学预防使用率低。
要点
- BRCA披露年龄晚于推荐RRBSO年龄,延迟了风险降低干预的 uptake。
- 无乳腺癌史者双侧乳房切除术使用率近年下降,而RRBSO使用率仍高。
- 仅25.4%无卵巢癌史者在推荐年龄内接受手术风险降低,导致24例可能可预防的卵巢癌。
核心结论
- 乳房切除术使用率似在下降,而RRBSO用于卵巢癌预防的使用率仍高。
- 大多数BRCA致病性变异的披露发生在推荐RRBSO年龄之后,延迟了风险降低干预的 uptake,并导致24例可能可预防的卵巢癌。
研究设计与样本
- 基于人群的回顾性研究,纳入1996至2019年在不列颠哥伦比亚省检测为BRCA1/2致病性变异阳性的所有女性,最终队列1920名BRCA1/2 PV携带者。
- 利用基于人群的行政数据分析与医疗系统的交互,确定截至2023年12月31日的风险降低干预使用情况。
主要发现
- 无乳腺癌史者(n=1021)中20.8%接受双侧乳房切除术,近年使用率下降。
- 处于或高于NCCN推荐RRBSO年龄范围者(n=1342)中71.8%接受RRBSO,约5%接受风险降低性输卵管切除术。
- 无卵巢癌史者中仅25.4%(n=318/1251)在推荐年龄范围内接受手术风险降低。
- 化学预防使用率低。
- BRCA披露后诊断27例卵巢癌和89例乳腺癌。
关键数值与推荐
- NCCN推荐RRBSO年龄范围:原文未报告具体阈值。
- 无乳腺癌史者双侧乳房切除术使用率:20.8%(n=1021)。
- 符合RRBSO年龄范围者RRBSO使用率:71.8%(n=1342)。
- 无卵巢癌史者在推荐年龄内手术风险降低比例:25.4%(n=318/1251)。
临床怎么用
- 应关注BRCA披露时机,尽早识别携带者以在推荐年龄内启动风险降低干预。
- 临床需向BRCA1/2携带者充分说明RRBSO、乳房切除术及化学预防的获益与局限,并监测干预使用趋势。
局限性
- 原文未报告局限性。
以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。
原文
OBJECTIVE: Being a female with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV) elevates risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer, and guidelines recommend preventive interventions and increased screening. This study assesses the use of risk-reducing interventions. METHODS: This population-based retrospective study included all females who tested positive for a BRCA1/2 PV in British Columbia between 1996 and 2019. Using population-based administrative data, we analyzed their interactions with the health care system to ascertain use of risk-reducing interventions until December 31st, 2023. RESULTS: The final cohort included 1920 BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Of those without a prior breast cancer (n = 1021), 20.8% underwent bilateral mastectomy, with declining uptake in recent years. Of those who were within or above the NCCN-recommended age range for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) (n = 1342), 71.8% underwent RRBSO, and ∼ 5% underwent risk-reducing salpingectomy. Notably, only 25.4% of patients without a prior ovarian cancer diagnosis underwent surgical risk-reduction within the recommended age range (n = 318/1251). Delays were primarily due to late age at BRCA disclosure. Uptake of chemoprevention was low. After BRCA disclosure, 27 ovarian and 89 breast cancers were diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of mastectomy appears to be decreasing, while uptake of RRBSO for ovarian cancer remains high. However, disclosure of most BRCA PV's occurred after the age of recommended RRBSO, delaying their uptake of risk-reducing interventions and resulting in 24 possibly preventable ovarian cancers.
引用
- Lloyd-Ellis S, Kaur P, Kwon JS, et al. Uptake of risk-reducing medical interventions among female BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: A population-based study in British Columbia. Gynecol Oncol. 2026. PMID: 42166900. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.05.018
供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。