文献速递产科母胎医学

预测胎盘介导胎儿生长受限的最佳脐动脉多普勒参考图

Optimal umbilical artery Doppler chart for predicting placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction.
PubMed 文献 · Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol · 2026-04-20

本研究为单中心回顾性队列,纳入2012至2022年单胎妊娠且≥20周行脐动脉多普勒检查者,比较10种脐动脉搏动指数参考图对胎盘介导胎儿生长受限相关结局的预测准确性,发现各图差异显著,Rahimi、Drukker和Flatley图整体表现最佳。

要点

  • 不同脐动脉搏动指数参考图对SGA胎儿判为FGR的比例差异大(2.2%至25.7%)
  • Rahimi、Drukker和Flatley图对胎盘介导FGR结局整体预测准确性最佳
  • 在<32周亚组中,上述三图仍保持最佳预测性能

核心结论

  • 10种脐动脉搏动指数参考图在判读SGA胎儿为FGR的比例及预测胎盘介导FGR结局的准确性上存在显著差异。
  • Rahimi、Drukker和Flatley三种参考图对全部三个研究结局的整体预测性能最佳。

研究设计与样本

  • 单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2012年1月至2022年12月单胎妊娠且≥20周行脐动脉多普勒检查者。
  • 主要结局为晚期脐动脉多普勒异常(舒张末期血流缺失或反向)和胎盘病理母体血管灌注不良(MVM)。
  • 次要结局为复合不良围产结局(死产、5分钟Apgar<7、脐动脉pH<7.1、需新生儿复苏和/或NICU入住)。

主要发现

  • 基于异常脐动脉搏动指数判为FGR的SGA胎儿比例随参考图不同,范围为2.2%至25.7%。
  • 预测晚期脐动脉多普勒异常:敏感度20.7%至76.3%,特异度75.2%至98.0%。
  • 预测胎盘病理MVM:敏感度6.8%至42.0%,特异度77.5%至98.6%。
  • 多数参考图在整体队列与孕龄亚组间的敏感度和特异度相当。
  • 按Youden指数排序,Rahimi、Drukker和Flatley图对两个主要结局整体预测准确性最佳,且在<32周亚组中保持前三。

关键数值与推荐

  • 脐动脉搏动指数异常定义为>95百分位。
  • 晚期脐动脉多普勒异常定义为舒张末期血流缺失或反向。
  • 复合不良围产结局定义:死产、5分钟Apgar<7、脐动脉pH<7.1、需新生儿复苏和/或NICU入住中至少一项。
  • 采用广义估计方程计算预测准确性,并考虑同一患者重复测量。

临床怎么用

  • 临床选择脐动脉搏动指数参考图时需注意不同图对FGR判读比例和预测准确性影响显著。
  • 若需预测胎盘介导FGR,可优先考虑Rahimi、Drukker和Flatley参考图。
  • 上述发现支持推动FGR诊断标准化,但需外部队列验证。

局限性

  • 本研究为单中心回顾性队列,结果外推需谨慎。
  • 结论基于特定人群和常规脐动脉多普勒检查实践,其他机构需验证。

以上解读依据论文摘要(全文未开放获取或许可不允许翻译转载)。

原文

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive accuracy of selected umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) reference charts for outcomes associated with placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with a singleton pregnancy who underwent UA Doppler assessment ≥ 20 weeks' gestation between January 2012 and December 2022 at a single tertiary referral center, at which UA Doppler is measured routinely regardless of fetal size. Using 10 different UA-PI reference charts, we compared the predictive accuracy of an abnormal UA-PI (> 95th percentile) for two primary outcomes that are considered specific and gestational-age-independent indicators of placenta-mediated FGR: (1) late-stage UA Doppler abnormalities (defined as absent or reversed end-diastolic flow); and (2) maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) on placental pathology. We also investigated the ability of these 10 charts to predict the secondary outcome of composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as the presence of at least one of the following: stillbirth, 5-min Apgar score < 7, UA pH < 7.1, need for neonatal resuscitation and/or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate the predictive accuracy of the UA-PI reference charts, accounting for repeated measurements within the same patient. To identify the best-performing reference chart, we ranked each chart based on its Youden index at the 95th percentile cut-off for UA-PI for the two primary outcomes. Given the distinct phenotypes of early- and late-onset FGR, we also performed an analysis stratified by gestational age at ultrasound examination (< 32 vs ≥ 32 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 15 841 patients, with 38 398 ultrasound examinations, were included in the analysis. The proportion of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses classified as FGR based on an abnormal UA-PI varied widely depending on which reference chart was applied, ranging from 2.2% to 25.7%. Similarly, the predictive accuracy of the 10 different reference charts for placenta-mediated FGR outcomes differed considerably. The predictive performance for late-stage UA Doppler abnormalities varied substantially across charts, with sensitivity ranging from 20.7% to 76.3% and specificity from 75.2% to 98.0%. Likewise, for the prediction of MVM on placental pathology, the sensitivity of the charts ranged from 6.8% to 42.0% and specificity from 77.5% to 98.6%. For most of the charts, sensitivity and specificity remained comparable between the overall cohort and gestational-age subgroups. When ranked according to overall predictive performance for the two primary outcomes using the Youden index, the UA-PI reference charts of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flatley et al. demonstrated the best overall predictive accuracy. These same three charts retained the top performance ranking for the prediction of primary study outcomes in the subgroup of cases examined < 32 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We observed substantial variation among 10 UA-PI reference charts in both the proportion of SGA fetuses classified as growth restricted and the predictive accuracy of each chart for outcomes considered specific to placenta-mediated FGR. Among the charts evaluated, those of Rahimi et al., Drukker et al. and Flately et al. demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting all three study outcomes. If confirmed in external cohorts, these findings would support the ongoing efforts to standardize the diagnosis of FGR, which is crucial for both clinical and research purposes. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

来源:Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,查看原文。版权归原作者所有。

引用

  1. Vayenas A, Kingdom J, Kongkham N, et al. Optimal umbilical artery Doppler chart for predicting placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2026. PMID: 42008820. doi:10.1002/uog.70222

供执业医师工作参考,不替代临床判断;数值与分级以指南原文为准。