Telemedicine interventions after colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
完整摘要 · 中文译文
目的:术后远程医疗随访日益受到关注。本研究旨在综合有关结直肠手术后远程医疗与常规护理相比对30天再入院率和急诊就诊率影响的文献。 方法:检索相关数据库至2025年9月12日。两位作者独立筛选试验、提取数据、评估偏倚风险(ROB 2.0和ROBINS-I)及证据确定性(GRADE)。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)和对照观察性研究。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。主要结局为30天再入院和30天急诊就诊。次要结局包括患者满意度和对远程医疗干预的依从性。 结果:共纳入13项研究(5项RCT,8项队列研究)。与常规护理相比,远程医疗在30天再入院(比值比[OR];0.96;95% CI:0.69,1.35,11项研究,7102例患者,低确定性)和30天急诊就诊(OR;1.02;95% CI:0.67,1.57,8项研究,6694例患者,低确定性)方面无差异。证据确定性受严重不精确性和中至高度偏倚风险的限制。各项研究中患者对干预的依从性范围为48.6%至95.3%。与常规护理相比,远程医疗的患者满意度更高(标准化均数差;0.88;95% CI:0.31,1.45,3项研究,217例患者)。 结论:远程医疗干预可能对再入院或急诊 结直肠手术后就诊于急诊科。与常规护理相比,远程医疗可能提高患者满意度。证据确定性较低,表明需要更大规模的随机试验和高质量观察性研究,并采用适当的设计和分析以尽量减少混杂。
完整摘要 · 英文原文
AIM: There has been increasing interest in telemedicine follow-up after surgery. This study aims to synthesize the literature regarding the effect of postoperative telemedicine after colorectal surgery on 30-day readmission and emergency department visit rates compared with usual care. METHOD: Relevant databases were searched until September 12, 2025. Two authors independently identified trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I), and evidence certainty (GRADE). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmissions and 30-day emergency department visits. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and compliance with the telemedicine intervention. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (five RCTs, eight cohort studies) were included. Compared to usual care, telemedicine resulted in no difference in 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR]; 0.96; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.35, 11 studies, 7102 patients, low certainty) and 30-day emergency department visits (OR; 1.02; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.57, 8 studies, 6694 patients, low certainty). Evidence certainty was limited by serious imprecision and moderate to high risk of bias. Patient compliance with interventions ranged from 48.6% to 95.3% across studies. Patient satisfaction was higher for telemedicine compared to usual care (standardized mean difference; 0.88; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.45, 3 studies, 217 patients). CONCLUSION: Telemedicine interventions may lead to little difference in readmissions or emergency department visits after colorectal surgery. Telemedicine may improve patient satisfaction versus usual care. Evidence was of low certainty, indicating a need for larger randomized trials and high-quality observational studies with appropriate design and analysis to minimize confounding.
摘要 待译
AIM: There has been increasing interest in telemedicine follow-up after surgery. This study aims to synthesize the literature regarding the effect of postoperative telemedicine after colorectal surgery on 30-day readmission and emergency department visit rates compared with usual care. METHOD: Relevant databases were searched until September 12, 2025. Two authors independently identified trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I), and evidence certainty (GRADE). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies were included.…