科研动态PubMed 摘要

不对称双相脉冲场消融治疗阵发性心房颤动:临床评估。

PubMed 白名单日捞 · 2026-10-16

完整摘要 · 中文译文

背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种用于心房颤动的非热、组织选择性治疗。在本研究中,我们评估了一种新型不对称双相PFA系统的安全性和有效性,该系统结合了独特的脉冲参数配置与专用的可调六分支导管。 方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、单臂研究在中国开展。药物难治性阵发性房颤患者使用具有新型参数配置的1,000 V不对称双相PFA系统接受肺静脉隔离(PVI)。主要有效性终点为空白期后12个月内无房性心律失常复发。主要安全性终点为预定义的严重不良事件。次要安全性终点为溶血和沉默性脑病灶(SCLs)。 结果:在120例入组患者中,105例接受了消融并完成了12个月随访,而15例患者在PFA操作前退出。所有420条目标静脉均成功实现急性PVI。在12个月时,无房性心律失常复发的Kaplan-Meier估计值为69.5%(95% CI,60.1-77.5%)。观察到的12个月有效性处于既往PFA技术研究报告的范围之内。在安全性方面,主要操作并发症——包括肺静脉狭窄、膈神经损伤、房食管瘘、卒中和急性肾损伤(AKI)——完全未发生。然而,一名患者(0.95%)出现了短暂性冠状动脉痉挛,并经冠状动脉内血管扩张剂成功缓解。此外, 在两名患者(1.9%)中检测到无症状脑病变(SCLs)。虽然实验室溶血是常见发现,但未导致肾功能损害。 结论:该不对称双相脉冲场消融(PFA)系统实现了完全的急性肺静脉隔离(PVI),12个月有效性处于既往PFA技术研究报道的范围内。其安全性特征良好,SCLs极少且无溶血相关急性肾损伤(AKI)。 临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134973,注册号ChiCTR2200062157。

完整摘要 · 英文原文

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal, tissue-selective therapy for atrial fibrillation. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel asymmetric biphasic PFA system, which combines a unique pulse-parameter configuration with a dedicated, adjustable six-spline catheter. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study was conducted in China. Patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a 1,000 V asymmetric biphasic PFA system with a novel parameter configuration. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence through 12 months post-blanking. The primary safety endpoint was predefined serious adverse events. The secondary safety endpoint was hemolysis and silent cerebral lesions (SCLs). RESULTS: Among 120 enrolled patients, 105 underwent ablation and completed the 12-month follow-up, while 15 patients withdrew before the PFA operation. Acute PVI was successfully achieved in all 420 targeted veins. At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 69.5% (95% CI, 60.1-77.5%). The observed 12-month effectiveness was within the range reported in previous studies of PFA technologies. Regarding safety, major procedural complications-including pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve injury, atrioesophageal fistula, stroke, and acute kidney injury (AKI)-were entirely absent. However, one patient (0.95%) experienced a transient coronary vasospasm that was successfully resolved with an intracoronary vasodilator. Additionally, SCLs were detected in two patients (1.9%). While laboratory hemolysis was a common finding, it did not lead to renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This asymmetric biphasic PFA system achieved complete acute PVI and 12-month effectiveness was within the range reported in previous studies of PFA technologies. It showed a favorable safety profile, with few SCLs and no hemolysis-related AKI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134973, identifier ChiCTR2200062157.

English
Asymmetric biphasic pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: clinical assessment.
内容仅供参考,不构成诊疗建议,不能替代执业医师的诊断。

← 返回元界