Home › Clinical Tools › Cervical FIGO

🎗️ Cervical cancer FIGO 2018 staging

UseStaging and first-line management direction for cervical cancer using the FIGO 2018 system (which incorporate…

Loading calculator…

SourceBhatla N, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019

Runs locally in your browser (no PHI uploaded). For licensed clinicians — not a substitute for clinical judgement.
Stored on this device for revisit reminders

This-shift next steps

After scoring: open the scene pack, peer scores, and the matching pathway. Local reference — no HIS write.

Score + version; reference only — not a substitute for care · no HIS write

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

Methodology · worked example, guidelines & full notes
Clinical takeaway

A key 2018 change: any nodal metastasis (any size, imaging r or pathology p) upstages to IIIC, recorded with an r/p notation.

When to use

Staging and first-line management direction for cervical cancer using the FIGO 2018 system (which incorporates imaging and pathology).

How it works

Highest level of involvement defines the stage: IA microscopic (≤ 3 / > 3–5 mm) → IB by size (≤ 2 / 2–4 / > 4 cm); II beyond uterus (IIA vagina / IIB parametria); III lower vagina (IIIA), pelvic wall/hydronephrosis (IIIB), pelvic nodes (IIIC1) / para-aortic (IIIC2); IVA mucosa/beyond pelvis, IVB distant.

Key points

  • A key 2018 change: any nodal metastasis (any size, imaging r or pathology p) upstages to IIIC, recorded with an r/p notation.
  • IB is subdivided by size (≤ 2 / > 2–4 / > 4 cm) into IB1/IB2/IB3 — a 2018 refinement over the older IB1/IB2 split.
  • Fertility-sparing options exist for selected IA–IB1 disease.

References

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

Local tumor extentIB3 — > 4 cm
Nodal metastasis (imaging r or pathology p)Pelvic nodes (→ IIIC1)
Bladder/rectal mucosa or beyond true pelvisNo
Distant metastasesNo

→FIGO stageIIIC1

  • FIGO 2018:IIIC1 (pelvic nodes positive)
  • Management direction:Management follows current guidelines and local protocols; this page gives no management recommendation.
  • Note:FIGO 2018 incorporates imaging (r) and pathology (p); any positive node → IIIC; stage IA requires microscopic assessment of the entire lesion
Local tumor extentIA1 — stromal invasion ≤ 3 mm (microscopic)
Nodal metastasis (imaging r or pathology p)None
Bladder/rectal mucosa or beyond true pelvisNo
Distant metastasesNo

→FIGO stageIA1

  • FIGO 2018:IA1 (stromal invasion ≤ 3 mm)
  • Management direction:Conization or extrafascial hysterectomy; fertility preservation possible if LVSI-negative and margins clear; LVSI+ → consider pelvic nodal assessment
  • Note:FIGO 2018 incorporates imaging (r) and pathology (p); any positive node → IIIC; stage IA requires microscopic assessment of the entire lesion
Verification & sources · governance
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What are the limits and cautions when using Cervical cancer FIGO 2018 staging?
For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.
Does Cervical cancer FIGO 2018 staging upload patient data? Where is it calculated?
Calculation runs locally in the browser; inputs and results are not uploaded. For licensed clinicians only; interpret with history, investigations and local protocols — not a diagnosis or prescription.
How is Cervical cancer FIGO 2018 staging calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
Inputs: Local tumor extent IB3 — > 4 cm, Nodal metastasis (imaging r or pathology p) Pelvic nodes (→ IIIC1), Bladder/rectal mucosa or beyond true pelvis No, Distant metastases No → Result: FIGO stage IIIC1(FIGO 2018: IIIC1 (pelvic nodes positive), Management direction: Management follows current guidelines and local protocols; this page gives no management recommendation., Note: FIGO 2018 incorporates imaging (r) and pathology (p); any positive node → IIIC; stage IA requires microscopic assessment of the entire lesion) Inputs: Local tumor extent IA1 — stromal invasion ≤ 3 mm (microscopic), Nodal metastasis (imaging r or pathology p) None, Bladder/rectal mucosa or beyond true pelvis No, Distant metastases No → Result: FIGO stage IA1(FIGO 2018: IA1 (stromal invasion ≤ 3 mm), Management direction: Conization or extrafascial hysterectomy; fertility preservation possible if LVSI-negative and margins clear; LVSI+ → consider pelvic nodal assessment, Note: FIGO 2018 incorporates imaging (r) and pathology (p); any positive node → IIIC; stage IA requires microscopic assessment of the entire lesion)
Related tools