📏 Relative Fat Mass (RFM)
UseWhen to use: adiposity counseling when BMI alone misclassifies.
StrataHigher RFM approximates higher DXA %fat; sex-specific teaching bands apply.
LimitsWhen not to use: pregnancy / tense ascites distorting waist. · Pitfall: mixed units. · Not a sole anti-obesity Rx order.
SourceRelative Fat Mass (Woolcott & Bergman) anthropometric equation
This-shift next steps
After scoring: open the scene pack, peer scores, and the matching pathway. Local reference — no HIS write.
Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.
Methodology · worked example, guidelines & full notes
Height/waist ratio.
When to use
When to use: adiposity counseling when BMI alone misclassifies.
How it works
RFM = 64 − 20×(height/waist) + 12×sex (female=1).
Key points
- Height/waist ratio.
- Sex offset +12.
- Next: metabolic labs / waist protocol.
References
- Relative Fat Mass (Woolcott & Bergman) anthropometric equation
Worked calculation
The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.
| Sex | Male (0) |
|---|---|
| Height | 170 cm |
| Waist circumference | 90 cm |
→RFM26.2%
- Height/waist:1.889
- Cue:Men: RFM ≥26 — higher adiposity teaching band
| Sex | Female (+12) |
|---|---|
| Height | 170 cm |
| Waist circumference | 90 cm |
→RFM38.2%
- Height/waist:1.889
- Cue:Women: RFM ≥35 — higher adiposity teaching band
Verification & sources · governance
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
- Does Relative Fat Mass (RFM) upload patient data? Where is it calculated?
- Calculation runs locally in the browser; inputs and results are not uploaded. For licensed clinicians only; interpret with history, investigations and local protocols — not a diagnosis or prescription.
- How is Relative Fat Mass (RFM) calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
- Inputs: Sex Male (0), Height 170 cm, Waist circumference 90 cm → Result: RFM 26.2 %(Height/waist: 1.889, Cue: Men: RFM ≥26 — higher adiposity teaching band) Inputs: Sex Female (+12), Height 170 cm, Waist circumference 90 cm → Result: RFM 38.2 %(Height/waist: 1.889, Cue: Women: RFM ≥35 — higher adiposity teaching band)