Home › Clinical Tools › BI-RADS mammo structured

🎀 Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read

UseStructured assistance in assigning a mammography BI-RADS category from descriptors.

Loading calculator…

SourceDestounis SV, Friedewald SM, Grimm LJ, Poplack SP, Sung JS. Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® v2025 Man…

Runs locally in your browser (no PHI uploaded). For licensed clinicians — not a substitute for clinical judgement.
Stored on this device for revisit reminders

This-shift next steps

After scoring: open the scene pack, peer scores, and the matching pathway. Local reference — no HIS write.

Score + version; reference only — not a substitute for care · no HIS write

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

Methodology · worked example, guidelines & full notes
Clinical takeaway

BI-RADS has no official scoring — the category is set by the most suspicious feature.

When to use

Structured assistance in assigning a mammography BI-RADS category from descriptors.

How it works

Most suspicious feature drives the level: spiculated mass or fine-linear branching calcifications (segmental/linear) or suspicious feature + retraction → 4C–5; → 4; circumscribed mass / focal asymmetry → 3; benign calcifications / fat-containing mass → 2.

Key points

  • BI-RADS has no official scoring — the category is set by the most suspicious feature.
  • Associated features (skin/nipple retraction) can upgrade a suspicious finding to 5.
  • v2025 splits category 0 into 'needs additional imaging' and 'needs prior comparison'.
  • The final category must integrate bilateral comparison, prior films and clinical context.

References

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

Mass marginObscured
Mass shape/densityOval or round, not high density
Calcification morphologyCoarse heterogeneous
Calcification distributionRegional
AsymmetryGlobal asymmetry
Architectural distortionNone
Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy)None

→Suggested categoryBI-RADS 4 (4A–4B)

  • Suggested category:BI-RADS 4 (4A–4B): Suspicious (malignancy ~ 2–50%)
  • Deciding feature:most suspicious feature → coarse heterogeneous calcifications (also: obscured mass margin, oval/round, not high-density mass)
  • Management:Biopsy (image-guided); require imaging-pathology concordance — only then is it benign
Mass marginNo mass
Mass shape/densityNot applicable (no mass)
Calcification morphologyNo calcifications
Calcification distributionNot applicable (no calcifications)
AsymmetryNone
Architectural distortionNone
Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy)None

→Suggested categoryBI-RADS 1

  • Suggested category:BI-RADS 1: Negative
  • Deciding feature:No abnormal feature entered (negative)
  • Management:No abnormal finding: routine screening
Verification & sources · governance
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What are the limits and cautions when using Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read?
For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.
Does Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read upload patient data? Where is it calculated?
Calculation runs locally in the browser; inputs and results are not uploaded. For licensed clinicians only; interpret with history, investigations and local protocols — not a diagnosis or prescription.
How is Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
Inputs: Mass margin Obscured, Mass shape/density Oval or round, not high density, Calcification morphology Coarse heterogeneous, Calcification distribution Regional, Asymmetry Global asymmetry, Architectural distortion None, Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy) None → Result: Suggested category BI-RADS 4 (4A–4B)(Suggested category: BI-RADS 4 (4A–4B): Suspicious (malignancy ~ 2–50%), Deciding feature: most suspicious feature → coarse heterogeneous calcifications (also: obscured mass margin, oval/round, not high-density mass), Management: Biopsy (image-guided); require imaging-pathology concordance — only then is it benign) Inputs: Mass margin No mass, Mass shape/density Not applicable (no mass), Calcification morphology No calcifications, Calcification distribution Not applicable (no calcifications), Asymmetry None, Architectural distortion None, Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy) None → Result: Suggested category BI-RADS 1(Suggested category: BI-RADS 1: Negative, Deciding feature: No abnormal feature entered (negative), Management: No abnormal finding: routine screening)
Related tools