Home › Clinical Tools › Silverman

👶 Silverman-Andersen Score (Neonatal Distress)

UseTrend work of breathing and response to support in newborns.

Loading calculator…

SourceSilverman WA, Andersen DH. Pediatrics 1956

Runs locally in your browser (no PHI uploaded). For licensed clinicians — not a substitute for clinical judgement.
Stored on this device for revisit reminders

This-shift next steps

After scoring: open the scene pack, peer scores, and the matching pathway. Local reference — no HIS write.

Score + version; reference only — not a substitute for care · no HIS write

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

Methodology · worked example, guidelines & full notes
Clinical takeaway

Higher score is worse (opposite of Apgar).

When to use

Trend work of breathing and response to support in newborns.

How it works

Upper chest, lower chest, xiphoid retraction, nares dilatation, expiratory grunt — each 0–2. 0–10 (0 = no distress).

Key points

  • Higher score is worse (opposite of Apgar).
  • Useful for monitoring response to respiratory support.
  • Complements oxygen saturation and blood gas.

References

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

Upper chest movementLag on inspiration (1)
Lower chest retractionJust visible (1)
Xiphoid retractionJust visible (1)
Nares dilatationMinimal (1)
Expiratory gruntAudible by stethoscope (1)

→Silverman-Andersen5/10

  • Interpretation:Moderate distress
  • Note:Unlike Apgar, a higher Silverman score is worse; 0 indicates no respiratory distress.
Upper chest movementSynchronised (0)
Lower chest retractionNone (0)
Xiphoid retractionNone (0)
Nares dilatationNone (0)
Expiratory gruntNone (0)

→Silverman-Andersen0/10

  • Interpretation:No distress
  • Note:Unlike Apgar, a higher Silverman score is worse; 0 indicates no respiratory distress.
Verification & sources · governance
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What are the limits and cautions when using Silverman-Andersen Score (Neonatal Distress)?
For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.
Does Silverman-Andersen Score (Neonatal Distress) upload patient data? Where is it calculated?
Calculation runs locally in the browser; inputs and results are not uploaded. For licensed clinicians only; interpret with history, investigations and local protocols — not a diagnosis or prescription.
How is Silverman-Andersen Score (Neonatal Distress) calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
Inputs: Upper chest movement Lag on inspiration (1), Lower chest retraction Just visible (1), Xiphoid retraction Just visible (1), Nares dilatation Minimal (1), Expiratory grunt Audible by stethoscope (1) → Result: Silverman-Andersen 5 /10(Interpretation: Moderate distress, Note: Unlike Apgar, a higher Silverman score is worse; 0 indicates no respiratory distress.) Inputs: Upper chest movement Synchronised (0), Lower chest retraction None (0), Xiphoid retraction None (0), Nares dilatation None (0), Expiratory grunt None (0) → Result: Silverman-Andersen 0 /10(Interpretation: No distress, Note: Unlike Apgar, a higher Silverman score is worse; 0 indicates no respiratory distress.)
Related tools